The ReWork-Stroke rehabilitation programme described by use of the TIDieR checklist

References

• Rosengren A, Giang KW, Lappas G, et al. Twenty-four-year trends in the incidence of ischemic stroke in Sweden from 1987 to 2010. Stroke. 2013;44:2388–2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfs A, Fazekas F, Grittner U, et al. Acute cerebrovascular disease in the young: the Stroke in Young Fabry Patients study. Stroke. 2013;44:340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X-J, Liu XF, Fong K. Outcomes of return-to-work after stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestling M, Ramel E, Iwarsson S. Thoughts and experiences from returning to work after stroke. Work. 2013;45:201–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riks-Stroke. 2015. 1-årsuppföljning 2015 – livssituation, tillgodosedda behov och resultat av vårdens och omsorgens insatser för de som insjuknade under 2014 [Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register: 1 year follow-up 2015 – lifesituation, fulfilled needs and results of health care services interventions for those suffering stroke during 2014]; [Internet] [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://www.riksstroke.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Riksstroke_1-%C3%A5rsuppf%C3%B6ljning_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Culler KH, Wang YC, Byers K, et al. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:325–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson GM, Johansson U, von Koch L. Returning to work after stroke. In: Wilson R, Raghavan P, editors. Stroke rehabilitation. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2019. p. 215–223.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:507–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Bergström A, Eriksson G, et al. Return to work after stroke: important aspects shared and contrasted by five stakeholder groups. Work. 2016;55:901–911.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donker-Cools BH, Daams JG, Wind H, et al. Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2016;30:113–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer för vård vid stroke 2018 [The National Board of Health and Welfare. National guidelines for stroke care. Support for governance and management]; 2018 [Internet] [cited 2019 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepointdokument/artikelkatalog/nationella-riktlinjer/2018-3-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz B, Claros-Salinas D, Streibelt M. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on facilitators and barriers of return to work after stroke. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:28–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannigan C, Galvin R, Walsh ME, et al. Barriers and facilitators associated with return to work after stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:211–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öst Nilsson A. ReWork-Stroke – content and experiences of a person-centred rehabilitation programme for return to work after stroke [dissertation]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Öst Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Johansson U, et al. Experiences of the return to work process after stroke while participating in a person-centred rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24:349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öst Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Asaba E, et al. Being a co-worker or a manager of a colleague returning to work after stroke: a challenge facilitated by cooperation and flexibility. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez G, Cerritelli F, Urrutia G. Using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) as a tool for improving the design and reporting of manual therapy interventions. Man Ther. 2016;24:85–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet P, Hunter SM, Donaldson C, et al. Using the TIDieR Checklist to standardize the description of a functional strength training intervention for the upper limb after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40:203–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy C. Long term efficacy of an integrated neurological and vocational rehabilitation programme for young adults with acquired brain injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:533–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntsiea MV, Van Aswegen H, Lord S, et al. The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:663–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trexler L, Parrott DR, Malec J. Replication of a prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation to improve return to work and school after brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RR. Kielhofner's model of human occupation: theory and application. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, et al. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:406–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveriges kommuner och Landsting. Hälso- och sjukvårdens funktion för koordinering i sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsprocessen. En litteraturstudie. [The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions: the function of healthcare for coordination in the process of sick leave and rehabilitation. A review]. Stockholm: SKL; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Materne M, Lundqvist LO, Strandberg T. Support persons' perceptions of giving vocational rehabilitation support to clients with acquired brain injury in Sweden. J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2016;15:351–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57:82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandqvist J. Evidensbaserad bedömning av arbetsförmåga. Assessment of Work Performance (AWP) och Assessment of Work Characteristics (AWC). Ergoterapeuten. 2017;1:62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, et al. Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1555–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hälso- och Sjukvårdslagen (SFS 2017:30). [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. The Health Care Act]; 2019 [Internet] [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/halso–och-sjukvardslag-201730_sfs-2017-30
   Google Scholar
• En kvalitetssäker och effektiv sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsprocess – Överenskommelse mellan staten och Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. [The Swedish Government Offices. A quality assured and effective sick leave and rehabilitation process. Agreement between the state and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions 2019]; 2019 [Internet] [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/overenskommelser-och-avtal/2019/01/en-kvalitetssaker-ocheffektivsjukskrivnings–och-rehabiliteringsprocess—overenskommelse-mellan-staten-ochsveriges-kommuner-och-landsting-2019/
   Google Scholar
• Varatharajan S, Côté P, Heather Shearer M, et al. Are work disability prevention interventions effective for the management of neck pain or upper extremity disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:692–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk L, Glise K, Pousette A, et al. Involving the employer to enhance return to work among patients with stress-related mental disorders – study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in Swedish primary health care. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:838–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lag om koordineringsinsatser för sjukskrivna patienter, SFS:2019:1297 [The Swedish Government Offices. Act about coordination for patients on sick leave]; 2020 [Internet] [cited 2020 May 15]. Available from: https://lagen.nu/2019:1297
   Google Scholar