3,837
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Return-to-work: Exploring professionals’ experiences of support for persons with spinal cord injury

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 571-581 | Received 10 Feb 2020, Accepted 08 Jul 2020, Published online: 05 Aug 2020

References

  • Wilcock AA, Hocking C. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare (NJ): Slack; 2015.
  • Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: TSO (The Stationery Office); 2006.
  • Saunders SL, Nedelec B. What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):100–110.
  • Hay-Smith EJ, Dickson B, Nunnerley J, et al. "The final piece of the puzzle to fit in": an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the return to employment in New Zealand after spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(17):1436–1446.
  • Holmlund L, Hultling C, Asaba E. Mapping out one's own paths toward work: focus on experiences of return to work after spinal cord injury. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(13):2020–2032.
  • Meade MA, Reed KS, Saunders LL, et al. It's all of the above: benefits of working for individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(1):1–9.
  • Sustainable development goals knowledge platform [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg8
  • Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities-optional protocol [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2006 [cited 2019 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-withdisabilities.html
  • Statistics Sweden. Situationen på arbetsmarknaden för personer med funktionsnedsättning 2017 (Eng.The labour market situation for people with disabilities 2017). Stockholm: Statistics Sweden; 2017.
  • Levi R, Hultling C, Seiger A. The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 4. Psychosocial and financial issues of the Swedish annual level-of-living survey in SCI subjects and controls. Paraplegia. 1996;34(3):152–157.
  • Valtonen K, Karlsson A, Alaranta H, et al. Work participation among persons with traumatic spinal cord injury and meningomyelocele1. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(3):192–200.
  • Ottomanelli L, Lind L. Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(5):503–531.
  • Bergmark L, Westgren N, Asaba E. Returning to work after spinal cord injury: exploring young adults' early expectations and experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25-26):2553–2558.
  • Holmlund L, Guidetti S, Eriksson G, et al. Return to work in the context of everyday life 7–11 years after spinal cord injury – a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(24):2875–2883.
  • Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Understanding decisions about work after spinal cord injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):69–80.
  • Roels EH, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, et al. Hospital- and community-based interventions enhancing (re)employment for people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(1):2–7.
  • Trenaman LM, Miller WC, Escorpizo R, SCIRE Research Team Interventions for improving employment outcomes among individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(11):788–794.
  • Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Suris A, et al. Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injuries: results from a randomized multisite study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(5):740–747.
  • Middleton JW, Johnston D, Murphy G, et al. Early access to vocational rehabilitation for spinal cord injury inpatients. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(7):626–631.
  • Hilton G, Unsworth CA, Murphy GC, et al. Longitudinal employment outcomes of an early intervention vocational rehabilitation service for people admitted to rehabilitation with a traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(8):743–752.
  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
  • Stahl C, Costa-Black K, Loisel P. Applying theories to better understand socio-political challenges in implementing evidence-based work disability prevention strategies. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(8):952–959.
  • Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, et al. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–568.
  • Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524.
  • Lederer V, Loisel P, Rivard M, et al. Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(2):242–267.
  • Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, et al. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):543–556.
  • Socialförsäkringsbalk (eng: Social Insurance Code) (SFS 2010:110). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
  • Arbetsmiljölag (eng: Work Environment Act) (SFS 1977:1160). Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet. Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet.
  • Hälso- och Sjukvårdslag (eng: Health and Medical Services Act) (SFS 2017:30). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
  • Lag om koordineringsinsatser för sjukskrivna patienter (SFS:2019:1297). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
  • Russell E, Kosny A. Communication and collaboration among return-to-work stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(22):2630–2639.
  • Ståhl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, et al. Swedish rehabilitation professionals' perspectives on work ability assessments in a changing sickness insurance system. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1373–1382.
  • Sturesson M, Edlund C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, et al. Work ability as obscure, complex and unique: views of Swedish occupational therapists and physicians. Work. 2013;45(1):117–128.
  • Hellman T, Bergstrom A, Eriksson G, et al. Return to work after stroke: Important aspects shared and contrasted by five stakeholder groups. Work. 2016;55(4):901–911.
  • Durand MJ, Nastasia I, Coutu MF, et al. Practices of return-to-work coordinators working in large organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):137–147.
  • Skarpaas LS, Haveraaen LA, Smastuen MC, et al. Horizontal return to work coordination was more common in RTW programs than the recommended vertical coordination. The Rapid-RTW cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):759
  • Karkkainen R, Saaranen T, Rasanen K. Return-to-work coordinators' practices for workers with burnout. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(3):493–502.
  • Pransky G, Shaw WS, Loisel P, et al. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):41–48.
  • Shaw W, Hong QN, Pransky G, et al. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.
  • Hälsooch sjukvårdsförvaltningen. Lägre sjukskrivning med rehabkoordinator: utvärdering och utveckling av rehabkoordinator för patienter med långvarig smärta och/eller lätt medelsvår psykisk ohälsa i Stockholms läns landsting. Stockholm: Stockholms läns landsting; 2018.
  • Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, et al. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):CD011618.
  • Schandelmaier S, Ebrahim S, Burkhardt SCA, et al. Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLOS One. 2012;7(11):e49760.
  • Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2014.
  • Bogdan R, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Pearson A & B; 2007.
  • Ivanoff SD, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(2):125–132.
  • Friese S. Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. London: Sage; 2014.
  • Rudman DL. Occupational terminology. J Occup Sci. 2010;17(1):55–59.
  • Rudman DL. Understanding political influences on occupational possibilities: an analysis of newspaper constructions of retirement. J Occup Sci. 2005;12(3):149–160.
  • Ramakrishnan K, Mazlan M, Julia PE, et al. Return to work after spinal cord injury: factors related to time to first job. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(8):924–927.
  • Krause JS. Years to employment after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(9):1282–1289.
  • Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJ. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):462–477.
  • Seing I, MacEachen E, Stahl C, et al. Early-return-to-work in the context of an intensification of working life and changing employment relationships. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):74–85.
  • Fritz H, Cutchin MP. The transactional perspective on occupation: a way to transcend the individual in health promotion interventions and research. J Occup Sci. 2017;24(4):446–457.
  • Hasselkus BR. The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK; 2011.
  • Townsend EA. Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2002.
  • Ost Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Asaba E, et al. Being a co-worker or a manager of a colleague returning to work after stroke: A challenge facilitated by cooperation and flexibility. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(3):2013–2222.
  • Ranner M, von Koch L, Guidetti S, et al. Client-centred ADL intervention after stroke: occupational therapists' experiences. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23(2):81–90.
  • Ranner M, Guidetti S, von Koch L, et al. Experiences of participating in a client-centred ADL intervention after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(25):3025–3033.
  • Joseph C, Andersson N, Bjelak S, et al. Incidence, aetiology and injury characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injury in Stockholm, Sweden: a prospective, population-based update. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(5):431–436.
  • Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.
  • Ost Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Johansson U, et al. Experiences of the return to work process after stroke while participating in a person-centred rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24(5):349–356.
  • Reed K, Hocking C, Smythe L. The interconnected meanings of occupation: the call, being-with, possibilities. J Occup Sci. 2010;17(3):140–149.
  • Charmaz K. Constructivist grounded theory. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12(3):299–300.