Multivariate correlations between pain, life interference, health-related quality of life and full-time sick leave 1 year after multimodal rehabilitation, focus on gender and age

References

• Linton SJ, Shaw WS. Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):700–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen LN, Kohberg M, Juul-Kristensen B, et al. Psychosocial aspects of everyday life with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Scand J Pain. 2014;5(2):131–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milton MB, Börsbo B, Rovner G, et al. Is pain intensity really that important to assess in chronic pain patients? A study based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker J, Reid KJ, Bekkering GE, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark and Sweden. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:371248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidwall U. Sick leave diagnoses and return to work: a Swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(5):396–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Social Insurance Agency. Social Insurance in figures 2019, 2019. Available from: https://www.forsakringskassan.se/wps/wcm/connect/cec4cea8-1d6c-4895-b442-bc3b64735b09/socialforsakringen-i-siffror-2019-engelsk.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID.
   Google Scholar
• Persson E, Lexell J, Rivano-Fischer M, et al. Everyday occupational problems perceived by participants in a pain rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(4):306–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, et al. Exploring experiences of “participation” among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(2):76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steger MF, Dik BJ, Duffy RD. Measuring meaningful work: the work and meaning inventory (WAMI). J Career Assess. 2012;20(3):322–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? United Kingdom: The Stationery Office; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Selenko E, Mäkikangas A, Stride CB. Does job insecurity threaten who you are? Introducing a social identity perspective to explain well-being and performance consequences of job insecurity. J Organiz Behav. 2017;38(6):856–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries HJ, Reneman MF, Groothoff JW, et al. Workers who stay at work despite chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: do they differ from workers with sick leave? J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):489–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson C, Isaksson G. Experiences of participation in occupations of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18(4):294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(5):670–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU) Rehabilitation for long-lasting pain. A litterature review. SBU-report 198 (In Swedish). Stockholm (Sweden). The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Norlund A, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K. Multidisciplinary interventions: review of studies of return to work after rehabilitation for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer MR, Persson EB, Stålnacke B-M, et al. Return to work after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: one-and two-year follow-up study based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(4):281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). Methods for treatments for long-lasting pain. A litterature review. SBU-report 177/1 (in Swedish). Stockholm (Sweden). The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Eib C. Sustainable return to work: a systematic review focusing on personal and social factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):679–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stålnacke B-M, Haukenes I, Lehti A, et al. Is there a gender bias in recommendations for further rehabilitation in primary care of patients with chronic pain after an interdisciplinary team assessment? J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(4):365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdle B, Boersma K, Åsenlöf P, et al. Influences of sex, education, and country of birth on clinical presentations and overall outcomes of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation in chronic pain patients: a cohort study from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). JCM. 2020;9(8):2374.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven HA, de Vet HC, Picavet HSJ. Explaining sex differences in chronic musculoskeletal pain in a general population. Pain. 2006;124(1–-2):158–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). Treatment of Long-Term Pain States. Focusing on Women; SBU-report 301 (In swedish). Stockholm (Sweden). The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Spinord L, Kassberg A-C, Stenberg G, et al. Comparison of two multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes, in relation to sex and age. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(7):619–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. [Indication for multimodal rehabilitation in chronic pain.] Stockholm: Rapport 2011. 2 (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003;106(3):337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Public employment Service. Available from: https://www.government.se/government-policy/labour-market/.
   Google Scholar
• van Agt HM, Essink-Bot M-L, Krabbe PF, et al. Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39(11):1537–1544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The west haven-yale multidimensional pain inventory (WHYMPI). Pain. 1985;23(4):345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JJ. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey – I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1349–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsson M, Sundbom E, Armelius BÅ, et al. PLS model building: a multivariate approach to personality test data. Scand J Psychol. 2001;42(5):399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Byrne T, Johansson E, et al. Multi-and megavariate data analysis basic principles and applications. 3rd rev. ed. Malmö: Umetrics Academy; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdle B, Akerblom S, Brodda Jansen G, et al. Who benefits from multimodal rehabilitation – an exploration of pain, psychological distress, and life impacts in over 35,000 chronic pain patients identified in the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation. JPR. 2019;12:891–908.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg VE, Novo M, Sjolund BH. Do Multidimensional Pain Inventory scale score changes indicate risk of receiving sick leave benefits 1 year after a pain rehabilitation programme? Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(17-18):1548–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrick D, Sundelin G, Stalnacke BM. An observational study of two rehabilitation strategies for patients with chronic pain, focusing on sick leave at one-year follow-up. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(10):1049–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sviridova O, Gard G, Michaelson P. Predictors for return to work after multimodal rehabilitation in persons with persistent musculoskeletal pain. Edorium J Disabil Rehabil. 2018;4:100038D05SO2018.
   Google Scholar
• Brendbekken R, Vaktskjold A, Harris A, et al. Predictors of return-to-work in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(2):193–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdle B, Molander P, Stenberg G, et al. Weak outcome predictors of multimodal rehabilitation at one-year follow-up in patients with chronic pain – a practice based evidence study from two SQRP centres. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vartiainen P, Heiskanen T, Sintonen H, et al. Health-related quality of life change in patients treated at a multidisciplinary pain clinic. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(7):1318–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenstra IA, Munhall C, Irvin E, et al. Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):369–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries HJ, Reneman MF, Groothoff JW, et al. Factors promoting staying at work in people with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(6):443–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylwander C, Larsson I, Andersson M, et al. The impact of chronic widespread pain on health status and long-term health predictors: a general population cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mose S, Christiansen DH, Jensen JC, et al. Widespread pain – do pain intensity and care-seeking influence sickness absence? – A population-based cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkerk K, Luijsterburg PA, Miedema HS, et al. Prognostic factors for recovery in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2012;92(9):1093–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truxillo DM, Cadiz DM, Hammer LB. Supporting the aging workforce: a review and recommendations for workplace intervention research. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2015;2:351–381.
   Google Scholar
• Lidwall U, Bill S, Palmer E, et al. Mental disorder sick leave in Sweden: a population study. Work. 2018;59(2):259–272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landstedt E, Harryson L, Hammarstrom A. Changing housework, changing health? A longitudinal analysis of how changes in housework are associated with functional somatic symptoms. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2016;75:31781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson A, Erlandsson LK, Hakansson C. The occupation-based intervention REDO™-10: Long-term impact on work ability for women at risk for or on sick leave. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(1):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu AM, Cuza A. How does education affect labour market outcomes. Rev Appl Socio-Econ Res. 2012;4(2):130–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ballo JG. Labour market participation for young people with disabilities: the impact of gender and higher education. Work Employ Soc. 2020;34(2):336–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Coutu MF, Tremblay D, et al. Insights into the sustainable return to work of aging workers with a work disability: an interpretative description study. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(1):92–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piha K, Laaksonen M, Martikainen P, et al. Interrelationships between education, occupational class, income and sickness absence. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20(3):276–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynöe N, Wessel M, Olsson D, et al. Respectful encounters and return to work: empirical study of long-term sick-listed patients' experiences of Swedish healthcare. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000246–e000246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOU 2014:74 Jämställdhet i socialförsäkringen? Forskningsrapport till Delegationen för jämställdhet i arbetslivet. Stockholm;2014.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications AC; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: Theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hill W, Macartney M. The role of occupational therapy in enabling people with chronic pain to return to work or education. Anaesthesia Intens Care Med. 2019;20(8):443–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturesson M, Edlund C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, et al. Work ability as obscure, complex and unique: views of Swedish occupational therapists and physicians. Work. 2013;45(1):117–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svanholm F, Liedberg GM, Lofgren M, et al. Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program – a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;25:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stigmar K, Grahn B, Ekdahl C. Work ability-experiences and perceptions among physicians. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(21):1780–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jensen I, Bergstrom G, et al. Returning to work – a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson DJ. A conception of adult development. Am Psychol. 1986;41(1):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar