Development and usability of an app-based instrument of participation in children with disabilities

References

• World Health Organization. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bedell G, Coster W, Law M, et al. Community participation, supports, and barriers of school-age children with and without disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(2):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Anaby D, Teplicky R, et al. Participation in the home environment among children and youth with and without disabilities. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76(2):58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Law M, Bedell G, et al. School participation, supports and barriers of students with and without disabilities. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(4):535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson S, Bjorkman B, Almqvist AL, et al. Children's voices – differentiating a child perspective from a child's perspective. Dev Neurorehabil. 2015;18(3):162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa UM, Brauchle G, Kennedy-Behr A. Collaborative goal setting with and for children as part of therapeutic intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(16):1589–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen CS, Dolva AS. Children's perspective on their right to participate in decision-making according to the United Nations convention on the rights of the child article 12. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr.2015;35(3):218–230.
   Google Scholar
• Moore L, Kirk S. A literature review of children's and young people's participation in decisions relating to health care. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(15–16):2215–2225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne I, Gallagher P. Participation in communication and decision-making: children and young people's experiences in a hospital setting. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(15–16):2334–2343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(1):16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair B, Ullenhag A, Rosenbaum P, et al. Measures used to quantify participation in childhood disability and their alignment with the family of participation-related constructs: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(11):1101–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Bornman J, et al. Picture My Participation, research version 1.0. 2014 [cited 2019 Jun 22]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/dmcn.12778_58
   Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Murphy J. Enabling young people with a learning disability to make choices at a time of transition. Br J Learning Disab. 2002;30(3):105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson P, Dada S, Granlund M, et al. Content validity and usefulness of picture My participation for measuring participation in children with and without intellectual disability in South Africa and Sweden. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(5):336–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Granlund M, Zhao Y, et al. Transcultural adaptation, content validity and reliability of the instrument 'picture My participation' for children and youth with and without intellectual disabilities in mainland China. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28(2):147–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson P, Dada S, Granlund M, et al. Structural validity and internal consistency of picture My participation: a measure for children with disability. Afr J Disabil. 2021;10:763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo CC, Kang LJ, Hwang AW, et al. Development of the picture my participation-Chinese version: cross-cultural adaptation for school age children in Taiwan. J Taiwan Occup Ther Res Prac. 2019;15(1):41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Liao YT, Hwang AW, Liao HF, et al. Understanding the participation in home, school, and community activities reported by children with disabilities and their parents: a pilot study. IJERPH. 2019;16(12):2217.
   Google Scholar
• Stans SEA, Dalemans RJP, de Witte LP, et al. Using talking mats to support conversations with communication vulnerable people: a scoping review. TAD. 2019;30(4):153–176.
   Google Scholar
• Boström P, Eriksson E. Design for self-reporting psychological health in children with intellectual disabilities. In IDC '15: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children; 2015; Medford, MA, USA. p. 279–282.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson S, Pain H, Hammond S, et al. Designing for young children with autism spectrum disorder: a case study of an iPad app. Int J Child Comput Interact. 2016;7:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis JM, Gurga A, Greif A, et al. Usability of the participation and environment measure plus (PEM+) for client-centered and participation-focused care planning. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73(4):7304205130p1–7304205130p8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarvis JM, Kaelin VC, Anaby D, et al. Electronic participation-focused care planning support for families: a pilot study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(8):954–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson S, Gilljam BM, Nygren J, et al. Redesign and validation of sisom, an interactive assessment and communication tool for children with cancer. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(2):e76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bornman J, Romski M, King M, et al. Supporting early communication skills of children with developmental disorders in South Africa: caregiver and clinician perspectives about mobile health applications. Infants Young Child. 2020;33(4):313–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The International Organization for Standardization. Part 11: Guidance on Usability. ISO 9241, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). 1998. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• Narad ME, Bedell G, King JA, et al. Social participation and navigation (SPAN): description and usability of app-based coaching intervention for adolescents with TBI. Dev Neurorehabil. 2018;21(7):439–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Bao J, Parmanto B. Systematic review protocol to assess the effectiveness of usability questionnaires in mHealth app studies. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(8):e151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiu WT, Yen CF, Teng SW, et al. Implementing disability evaluation and welfare services based on the framework of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: experiences in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke J. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. 1986. Available from: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/survey/systemusabilityscale%2528sus%2529_comp%255B1%255D.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Social Science Open Access Repository. Available from: https://nbn-resolvingorg/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.2014.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, et al. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4(1):215824401452263–215824401452210.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer K, Pollock N, Wright FV. Addressing the challenges of collaborative goal setting with children and their families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34(2):138–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruland CM, Slaughter L, Starren J, et al. Children's contributions to designing a communication tool for children with cancer. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):977–982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas R, Barker L, Rubin G, et al. Assistive technology for children and young people with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;18(6):Cd011350.
   Google Scholar
• Myrden A, Schudlo L, Weyand S, et al. Trends in communicative access solutions for children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(8):1108–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiariti V. My abilities first: positive language in health care. Clin Teach. 2020;17(3):272–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar