Targeting the school environment to enable participation: A scoping review

References

• UNESCO. Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Paris: UNESCO; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto K, Huerta MC, Kubacka K. Fostering social and emotional skills for well‐being and social progress. Eur J Educ. 2015;50:147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster M, Pijl SJ, Nakken H, et al. Social participation of students with special needs in regular primary education in The Netherlands. Intern J Disabil Dev Educ. 2010;57:59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griebler U, Rojatz D, Simovska V, et al. Effects of student participation in school health promotion: a systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2017;32:195–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose PE, Ryan N, Pryor J. Does social connectedness promote a greater sense of well‐being in adolescence over time? J Res Adolesc. 2012;22:235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simovska V, Jensen BB. Conceptualizing participation: the health of children and young people. Brussels: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Petrenchik TM, King GA. Pathways to positive development: childhood participation in everyday places and activities. In Bazyk S, editor. Mental health promotion, prevention, and intervention in children and youth: a guiding framework for occupational therapy. North Bethesda (MD): AOTA Press; 2011. p. 71–94.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux G, Waslander S, Eimers T. Evaluatie passend onderwijs Eindrapport. Amsterdam: Kohnstamm Instituut; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Piskur B. Parents’ role in enabling the participation of their child with a physical disability: actions, challenges and needs. Maastricht: Datawyse/Universitaire Pers Maastricht; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab S. Friendship stability among students with and without special educational needs. Educ Stud. 2019;45:390–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy S, Banks J. Simply academic? Why children with special educational needs don’t like school. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2012;27:81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossaert G, de Boer AA, Frostad P, et al. Social participation of students with special educational needs in different educational systems. Ir Educ Stud. 2015;34:43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. International standard classification of education: ISCED 2011. Montreal (QC): UNESCO-UIS; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto C, Baines E, Bakopoulou I. The peer relations of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream primary schools: the importance of meaningful contact and interaction with peers. Br J Educ Psychol. 2019;89:818–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramidis E, Avgeri G, Strogilos V. Social participation and friendship quality of students with special educational needs in regular Greek primary schools. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2018;33:221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guichard S, Grande C. Differences between pre-school children with and without special educational needs functioning, participation, and environmental barriers at home and in community settings: an international classification of functioning, disability, and health for children and youth approach. Front Educ. 2018;3:7.
   Google Scholar
• Sadownik A. Belonging and participation at stake. Polish migrant children about (mis) recognition of their needs in Norwegian ECECs. Eur Early Child Educ Res J. 2018;26:956–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid [Internet]. The Netherlands: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap; [cited 2022 Jul 4]. Available from: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/passend-onderwijs
   Google Scholar
• Inclusive education – Including children with disabilities in quality learning: what needs to be done? [Internet]. Europe: UNICEF; 2017 [cited 2020 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/eca/sites/unicef.org.eca/files/IE_summary_accessible_220917_brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong AC, Armstrong D, Spandagou I. Inclusive education: international policy & practice. California: SAGE; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cusiël N. Onderzoek naar de attitude en competentiebeleving van leerkrachten in het regulier onderwijs ten aanzien van passend onderwijs [research about attitude and perceived competence of teachers in general education concerning inclusive education]. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen J, Brotherus A, Venninen T. Children’s participation in Finnish pre-school education-identifying, describing and documenting children’s participation. Nord Early Child Educ Research. 2014;7:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Deunk MI, Doolaard S, Smalle-Jacobse A, et al. Differentiation within and across classrooms: a systematic review of studies into the cognitive effects of differentiation practices. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen: GION onderwijs/onderzoek; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pijl SJ. Preparing teachers for inclusive education: some reflections from The Netherlands. J of Research in Spec Educ Needs. 2010;10:197–201.
   Google Scholar
• Richter D, Kunter M, Klusmann U, et al. Professional development across the teaching career: teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teach Prof Dev. 2011;27:116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Borg E, Drange I. Interprofessional collaboration in school: effects on teaching and learning. Improv Sch. 2019;22:251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill SM, Bazyk S. School-based occupational therapy. In Clifford O’Brien J, Kuhaneck H, editors. Case-Smith’s occupational therapy for children and adolescents. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2020. p. 627–658.
   Google Scholar
• Case-Smith J, O’Brien JC. Occupational therapy for children and adolescents. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boop C, Cahill SM, Davis C, et al. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process fourth edition. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74:1–85.
   Google Scholar
• Egilson ST, Jakobsdóttir G, Ólafsson K, et al. Community participation and environment of children with and without autism spectrum disorder: parent perspectives. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaby D, Hand C, Bradley L, et al. The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1589–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egilson ST, Traustadottir R. Assistance to pupils with physical disabilities in regular schools: promoting inclusion or creating dependency? Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2009;24:21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. Intern Encycl Educ. 1994;3:37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Izadi-Najafabadi S, Ryan N, Ghafooripoor G, et al. Participation of children with developmental coordination disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2019;84:75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piškur B, Meuser S, Jongmans AJHM, et al. The lived experience of parents enabling participation of their child with a physical disability at home, at school and in the community. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:803–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härkönen U. The Bronfenbrenner ecological systems theory of human development. Joensuu: University of Joensuu; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Camargo SPH, Rispoli M, Ganz J, et al. A review of the quality of behaviorally-based intervention research to improve social interaction skills of children with ASD in inclusive settings. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:2096–2116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat F, Hsairi I, Baati H, et al. The effect of a motor skills training programme in the improvement of practiced and non-practiced tasks performance in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Hum Mov Sci. 2016;46:10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue C, O’Leary J, Lynch H. Occupational therapy services in school-based practice: a pediatric occupational therapy perspective from Ireland. Occup Ther Intern. 2021;2021:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazyk S, Michaud P, Goodman G, et al. Integrating occupational therapy services in a kindergarten curriculum: a look at the outcomes. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:160–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak I, Honan I. Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: a systematic review. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:258–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaelin V, Ray-Kaeser S, Moioli S, et al. Occupational therapy practice in mainstream schools: results from an online survey in Switzerland. Occup Ther Intern. 2019;2019:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Intern J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abawi L, Oliver M. Shared pedagogical understandings: schoolwide inclusion practices supporting learner needs. Improv Schools. 2013;16:159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Locke J, Kang-Yi C, Pellecchia M, et al. It’s messy but real: a pilot study of the implementation of a social engagement intervention for children with autism in schools. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2019;19:135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiere AR. Inclusion through infusion: disability awareness training for elementary educators [dissertation]. Boston (MA): Boston University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Selanikyo E, Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weintraub N. Enhancing classroom participation of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Can J Occup Ther. 2017;84:76–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosskey L, Vance M. Training teachers to support pupils’ listening in class: an evaluation using pupil questionnaires. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2011;27:165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippatou D, Kaldi S. The effectiveness of project-based learning on pupils with learning difficulties regarding academic performance, group work and motivation. Intern J Spec Educ. 2010;25:17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Firth N, Frydenberg E, Steeg C, et al. Coping successfully with dyslexia: an initial study of an inclusive school‐based resilience programme. Dyslexia. 2013;19:113–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster‐Cohen S, Mirfin‐Veitch B. Evidence for the effectiveness of visual supports in helping children with disabilities access the mainstream primary school curriculum. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2017;17:79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi JN, Beebe-Frankenberger ME. Pioneering RTI systems that work: social validity, collaboration, and context. Teach Except Child. 2009;42:64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Mautone JA, Marshall SA, Sharman J, et al. Development of a family–school intervention for young children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psych Rev. 2012;41:447–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missiuna C, Pollock N, Campbell WN, et al. Use of the medical research council framework to develop a complex intervention in pediatric occupational therapy: assessing feasibility. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33:1443–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narozanick T, Blair KSC. Evaluation of the class pass intervention: an application to improve classroom behavior in children with disabilities. J of Pos Behav Interv. 2019;21:159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panerai S, Zingale M, Trubia G, et al. Special education versus inclusive education: the role of the TEACCH program. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:874–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radley KC, McHugh MB, Taber T, et al. School-based social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2017;32:256–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strain PS, Wilson K, Dunlap G. Prevent-teach-reinforce: addressing problem behaviors of students with autism in general education classrooms. Behav Disord. 2011;36:160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell RP, Lewis TJ, Raynor C. The impact of universal teacher practices and function-based behavior interventions on the rates of problem behaviors among at-risk students. Educ Treat Child. 2016;39:261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nota L, Ginevra MC, Soresi S. School inclusion of children with intellectual disability: an intervention program. J Intel & Dev Dis. 2019;44:439–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman KN, Ledford JR, Gagnon KL, et al. Social stories and visual supports interventions for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Beh Dis. 2020;45:207–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner B, Latimer J, Adams E, et al. School-based intervention to address self-regulation and executive functioning in children attending primary schools in remote Australian aboriginal communities. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0234895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazou S, Long K, Lakes KD, et al. ‘Walkabouts’ integrated physical activities from preschool to second grade: feasibility and effect on classroom engagement. Child Youth Care Forum. 2021;50:39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Method. 2008;8:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaby DR, Campbell WN, Missiuna C, et al. Recommended practices to organize and deliver school‐based services for children with disabilities: a scoping review. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45:15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniawati F, De Boer AA, Minnaert AEM, et al. Characteristics of primary teacher training programmes on inclusion: a literature focus. Educ Res. 2014;56:310–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee FLM, Yeung AS, Tracey D, et al. Inclusion of children with special needs in early childhood education: what teacher characteristics matter. Topics Early Child Spec Educ. 2015;35:79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski WW, Hughes CE. Response to intervention, collaboration, and co-teaching: a logical combination for successful systemic change. Prevent School Fail. 2009;53:267–277.
   Google Scholar
• ] Hartmann E. Universal design for learning (UDL) and learners with severe support needs. Intern J Whole School. 2015;11:54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay S, Proulx M, Scott H, et al. Exploring teachers’ strategies for including children with autism spectrum disorder in mainstream classrooms. Intern J Incl Educ. 2014;18:101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calculator SN. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and inclusive education for students with the most severe disabilities. Inter J Incl Educ. 2009;13:93–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killeen H, Shahin S, Bedell GM, et al. Supporting the participation of youth with physical disabilities: parents’ strategies. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82:153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciver D, Rutherford M, Arakelyan S, et al. Participation of children with disabilities in school: a realist systematic review of psychosocial and environmental factors. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivory DM. The impact of dynamic furniture on classroom performance: a pilot study [master’s thesis]. Tacoma (WA): University of Puget Sound; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ramli NH, Ahmad S, Masri MH. Improving the classroom physical environment: classroom users’ perception. Proc-Soc Behav Sci. 2013;101:221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner P, Clark J, Hall E, et al. Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design. Learning Environ Res. 2010;13:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle JM, Pea RD, Hoadley CM, et al. Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Future Child. 2000;10:76–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton E, Tuppeny S, Hasselbusch A. Making a case for universal and targeted children’s occupational therapy in the United Kingdom. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:450–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White H, LaFleur J, Houle K, et al. Evaluation of a school‐based transition program designed to facilitate school reentry following a mental health crisis or psychiatric hospitalization. Psychol Schs. 2017;54:868–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capp MJ. The effectiveness of universal design for learning: a meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. Inter J Incl Educ. 2017;21:791–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad MAE. The effectiveness of a life skills training based on the response to intervention model on improving functional communication skills in children with. Autism. Inter J Psycho-Educ Sci. 2018;7:56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hite JE, McGahey JT. Implementation and effectiveness of the response to intervention (RTI) program. Georgia School Counsel Assoc J. 2015;22:28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey R, Steege MW. Response to intervention: principles and strategies for effective practice. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar