Potential roles of occupational therapists in urban planning for age-friendly environments: A Q-methodology

References

• World Health Organization. Measuring the age-friendliness of cities: a guide to using core indicators. Kobe: World Health Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund. State of the world population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth. New York (NY): united Nations Population Fund; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• World population prospects 2022 [Internet]. New York (NY): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs; [cited 2022 Nov 26]. Available from: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). 5th Study group on measures to deal with aging population in urban areas. Tokyo: MHLW; 2013. Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Case study: the age-friendly programme in Akita City [Internet]. Genève: World Health Organization; [cited 2020 Dec 12]. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/resources/age-friendly-case-studies/akita-city/
   Google Scholar
• [About the development of promotion guideline of city development of health, medical care, welfare] (in Japanese) [Internet]. Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.mlit.go.jp/toshi/toshi_machi_tk_000055.html
   Google Scholar
• [About the formulation of health, medical and welfare city development guide-district level diagnosis and prescription] (in Japanese) [Internet]. Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.mlit.go.jp/toshi/toshi_machi_tk_000055.html
   Google Scholar
• [Tokyo metropolitan welfare city development ordinance full text] (in Japanese) [Internet]. Tokyo: Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Government; 2009 [cited 2020 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/kiban/machidukuri/jourei_kisoku/jourei.html
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard AL, Dallman AR, Carroll A, et al. Doing occupational justice: a central dimension of everyday occupational therapy practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2020;87:144–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis E, Lemieux V. Social participation of seniors: applying the framework of occupational justice for healthy ageing and a new approach to policymaking. J Occup Sci. 2021;28:332–348.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson I, Townsend E. Occupational Justice -Bridging theory and practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadnyk RL, Townsend EA, Wilcock AA. Occupational justice. In: Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. New multidisciplinary perspectives for understanding human occupation as a central feature of individual experience and social organisation. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Health Science; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT). Survey report: age friendly cities and the role of occupational therapy. London: WFOT; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Restall G, Leclair L, Banks S. Inclusiveness through community development. Occup Ther Now. 2005;7:9–11.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapy (WFOT). Position statement: occupational therapy and ageing across the life course. London: WFOT; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hyett N, Kenny A, Dickson-Swift V. Re-imagining occupational therapy clients as communities: presenting the community-centered practice framework. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;26:246–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauckner H, Leclair L, Yamamoto C. Moving beyond the individual: occupational therapists’ multi-layered work with communities. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82:101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclair LL, Lauckner H, Yamamoto C. An occupational therapy community development practice process. Can J Occup Ther. 2019;86:345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamata H, Yamada T, Kobayashi N. [Effectiveness of an occupational therapy program for health promotion among healthy elderly: 6-month follow-up survey]. Jpn J Occup Behav. 2014;18:120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Nomura K, Kobayashi N. Developing a group program for older males to participate in social activities in Japan: a mixed-methods study. Am J Men’s Health. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1557988321989899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi M, Goami N, Bontje P. Benefits of daily occupational diary use 3 months after a health promotion program for community-dwelling older adults. Am J Occup Ther. 2022;76(5):7605205040.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulholland S, Johnson S, Ladd B, et al. Why urban design matters to occupational therapy. Occup Ther Now. 2009;11:5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Drevland IS. Healthy cities and healthy urban design [master’s thesis]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson S, Kent J. Healthy built environments supporting everyday occupations: current thinking in urban planning. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zur B, Laliberte Rudman D. WHO age friendly cities: enacting societal transformation through enabling occupation. J Occup Sci. 2013;20:370–381.
   Google Scholar
• Lauckner HM, Stadnyk RL. Examining an occupational perspective in a rural Canadian age-friendly consultation process. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014;61:376–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr S. Exploring perceptions about services using Q methodology. In: Kielhofner G, editor. Research in occupational therapy: methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis Company; 2006. p. 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Donner JC, et al. Using Q-Sorts in participatory processes: an introduction to the methodology. In: Krueger RA, Casey MA, Donner J, Kirsch S, editors. Social analysis selected tools and techniques. Washington (DC): Social Development Department, The World Bank; 2001. p. 24–49.
   Google Scholar
• Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2005;2:67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists. [The statistics of Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists membership 2019]. J Jpn Assoc Occup Ther. 2020;102:5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Maeda R. [Dementia-friendly traffic in Tokyo: thoughts on a first urban model]. Tokyo Occup Ther Res. 2017;5:24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Clark F, Azen SP, Zemke R, et al. Occupational therapy for independent-living older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278:1321–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. Active ageing: dream or reality? N Z J Occup Ther. 2007;54:15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. 1st ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications Ace; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson I. Everyday life and home modification for older adults: impacts, concepts and instrument development [dissertation]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell T, Wilding C. Where can an occupation-focussed philosophy take occupational therapy? Aust Occup Ther J. 2010;57:345–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat JD, Redmond JD, Grabowecky BR. The Winter walkability project: occupational therapists’ role in promoting citizen engagement. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77:7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada T, Kawamata H, Kobayashi N, et al. A randomised clinical trial of a wellness programme for healthy older people. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73:540–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome K, Worrall LE, Fleming JM, et al. Identifying age-friendly behaviours for bus driver age-awareness training. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78:118–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauckner HM, Krupa TM, Paterson ML. Conceptualizing community development: occupational therapy practice at the intersection of health services and community. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78:260–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D, Forwell S. Special issue on social policy and occupational science. J Occup Sci. 2013;20:283–285.
   Google Scholar
• Whatley E, Fortune T, Williams AE. Enabling occupational participation and social inclusion for people recovering from mental ill-health through community gardening. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62:428–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowles GD, Perkinson MA, Barney KF. The physical environment and aging. In: Occupational therapy with aging adults: promoting quality of life through collaborative practice. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2016. p. 315–330.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl A, Månsson Lexell E. Facilitators for travelling with local public transport among people with mild cognitive limitations after stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25:108–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapist. CAOT position statement occupational therapy and older adults (2011). Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapist; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• College of Occupational Therapists (Current name: Royal College of Occupational Therapists). Position statement: age friendly communities. London: College of Occupational Therapists; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Akita City. [The second action plan toward age-friendly city, Akita city]. Akita; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sy MP, Ohshima N, Roraldo MPNR. The role of Filipino occupational therapists in substance addiction and rehabilitation: a Q-methodology. Occup Ther Mental Health. 2018;34:367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapy (WFOT). Position statement: occupational therapy and community-centered practice. London: WFOT; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• PQMethod manual [Internet]. Schmolck; 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 8]. Available from: http://schmolck.org/qmethod/pqmanual.htm
   Google Scholar
• Webler T, Danielson S, Tuler S. Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield (MA): Social and Environmental Research Institute; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1954;19:149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1:245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto Y. [Types of occupational values in university students]. Gakujutsu Kenkyu Acad Stud Sci Res Cult Sci Soc Sci. 2015;63:103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E. Critical occupational literacy: thinking about occupational justice, ecological sustainability, and aging in everyday life. J Occup Sci. 2015;22:389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou N, Marquis R, Dare J. Identifying the enablers and barriers to community participation amongst older adults. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:742–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerful practice: a model for authentic occupational therapy. Fort Collins (CO): Center for Innovative OT Solutions; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Nagayama H, Kobayashi N, Ishibashi Y, et al. Cost and outcome of occupation-based practice for community dwelling frail elderly: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1177–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trentham BL, Neysmith SM. Exercising senior citizenship in an ageist society through participatory action research: a critical occupational perspective. J Occup Sci. 2018;25:174–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson S, Falk C, Tillman S, et al. Life filming as a means of participatory approach together with older community-dwelling persons regarding their local environment. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25:347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberg F, Pollard N. Overcoming occupational apartheid. In: Kronenberg F, Algado SS, Pollard N, editors. Occupational therapy without borders–learning from the spirit of survivors. F. A. Davis Company; Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 58–86.
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process (4th ed.). Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74:7412410010p1–7412410010p87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson K, Lilja M, Petersson I, et al. Performance of activities of daily living in a sample of applicants for home modification services. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14:44–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersson I, Kottorp A, Bergström J, et al. Longitudinal changes in everyday life after home modifications for people aging with disabilities. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16:78–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Wilcock AA. Occupational justice and client-centred practice: a dialogue in progress. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:75–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerlach AJ, Teachman G, Laliberte-Rudman D, et al. Expanding beyond individualism: engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford G, Townsend E. Participatory occupational justice framework (POJF 2010): enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In: Kronenberg F, Pollard N, Sakellariou D, editors. Occupational therapies without borders – volume 2: towards an ecology of occupation-based practices. London: Elsevier; 2011. p. 65–84.
   Google Scholar