The centrality of work in everyday life after stroke: A qualitative study of long-term stroke survivors

References

• Kuluski K, Dow C, Locock L, et al. Life interrupted and life regained? Coping with stroke at a young age. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2014;9:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A, Bisquera A, Wang Y, et al. Factors, trends, and long-term outcomes for stroke patients returning to work: the South London Stroke Register. Int J Stroke. 2019;14:696–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin J, Barajas J, Ekberg K. Stroke patients’ experiences of return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1051–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenius C, Claesson L, Blomstrand C, et al. Integrating consequences of stroke into everyday life – experiences from a long-term perspective. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;29:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnbom K, Lundälv J, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Long-term participation 7–8 years after stroke: experiences of people in working-age. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0213447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young A, Roessler R, Wasiak R, et al. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:557–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öst Nilsson A. ReWork-Stroke: content and experiences of a person-centred rehabilitation programme for return to work after stroke. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, Dept of Neuroscience; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards JD, Kapoor A, Linkewich E, et al. Return to work after young stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2018;13:243–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jood K, Fransson E. Faktorer i arbetslivet och återgång till arbete efter stroke eller risk för ny stroke: en kunskapsöversikt. Allmänmedicin: Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin och folkhälsa; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Palstam A, Westerlind E, Persson HC, et al. Work-related predictors for return to work after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2019;139:382–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlind E, Persson HC, Eriksson M, et al. Return to work after stroke: a Swedish nationwide registry-based study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;141:56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarnio K, Rodríguez-Pardo J, Siegerink B, et al. Return to work after ischemic stroke in young adults: a registry-based follow-up study. Neurology. 2018;91:e1909–e1917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo M, Haruyama Y, Muto G, et al. Employment sustainability after return to work among Japanese stroke survivors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018;91:717–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland A, Jeon S-HP, Rotermann MMA, et al. Effects of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health events on work and earnings: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ. 2019;191:E3–E10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestling M, Ramel E, Iwarsson S. Thoughts and experiences from returning to work after stroke. Work. 2013;45:201–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner GM, McMullan C, Atkins L, et al. TIA and minor stroke: a qualitative study of long-term impact and experiences of follow-up care. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20:176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palstam A, Törnbom M, Sunnerhagen KS. Experiences of returning to work and maintaining work 7 to 8 years after a stroke: a qualitative interview study in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e021182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Jood K, Ladenvall C, Rosengren A, et al. Family history in ischemic stroke before 70 years of age: the sahlgrenska academy study on ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:1383–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qual Soc Work. 2002;1:261–283.
   Google Scholar
• Carcary M. The research audit trial – enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electronic J Busin Res Methods. 2009;7:11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, et al. Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e009974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman P, Riazi A, Pereira C, et al. Social participation post stroke: a meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:2031–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander A, Iwarsson S, Jönsson A-C, et al. Living and ageing with stroke: an exploration of conditions influencing participation in social and leisure activities over 15 years. Brain Inj. 2018;32:858–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz B, Claros-Salinas D, Streibelt M. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on facilitators and barriers of return to work after stroke. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:28–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarre S, Redlich C, Tinker A, et al. A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: lessons for the study of resilience. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:716–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellema S, van Der Sande R, van Hees S, et al. Role of environmental factors on resuming valued activities poststroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:991–1002.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample Size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:e021182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar