Evaluation of the group intervention “Let’s Get Organized” for improving time management, organisational, and planning skills in people with mild intellectual disability

References

• Aeon B, Faber A, Panaccio A. Does time management work? A meta-analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33428644/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomack B. Time management for today’s workplace demands. Workplace Health Saf. 2012; 60:201–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Janeslätt GK, Holmqvist KL, White S, et al. Assessment of time management skills: psychometric properties of the Swedish version. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018; 25:153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole MB. Time mastery in business and occupational therapy. Work. 1998; 10:119–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor R. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation: theory and application. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Schalock RL, Luckasson R, Tassé MJ. Intellectual disability: definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports. 12th ed. Silver Spring, MD: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD); 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Owen AL, Wilson RR. Unlocking the riddle of time in learning disability. J Intellect Disabil. 2006;10:9–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roshanay A, Janeslätt G, White S, et al. Time management skills in relation to general self-efficacy and parental sense of competence in individuals with and without cognitive disabilities. 2019;6(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL. Emotion-related regulation: sharpening the definition. Child Dev. 2004;75:334–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maedgen JW, Carlson CL. Social functioning and emotional regulation in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes. J Clin Child Psychol. 2000;29:30–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology [Internet]. 2002;39:281–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O’Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson G, Jonsson H. The impact of time aids on independence and autonomy in adults with developmental disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2006;13:160–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer ML. Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a palmtop personal computer. Ment Retard. 2002;40:358–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grey I, Healy O, Leader G, et al. Using a time timer to increase appropriate waiting behavior in a child with developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama T, Wang HT. Use of activity schedule to promote independent performance of individuals with autism and other intellectual disabilities: a review. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:2235–2242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström S, Østby M, Bakken H, et al. How using assistive technology for cognitive impairments improves the participation and self-determination of young adults with intellectual developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2021;25:168–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk W, Gage NA. The effectiveness of visual activity schedules for individuals with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analysis. J Intellect Develop Disabil. 2019;44:384–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg B, Kjellberg A. Participation when using cognitive assistive devices–from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2010;17:168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. TAD. 2004;15:231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Federici S. Why people use and don’t use technologies: introduction to the special issue on assistive technologies for cognition/cognitive support technologies. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37:315–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist L, Danielsson H, Jönsson A, et al. Feasibility of a tablet-based program for training everyday planning in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. J Cogn Educ Psych. 2020;19:172–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein RS. Dynamic cognitive assessment and the instrumental enrichment program: origins and development. In: Kozulin A, Rand Y, editors. Experience of mediated learning: an impact of Feuerstein’s theory in education and psychology. Elmsford (NY): Pergamon Press; 2000. p. 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Räty LMO, Kontu EK, Pirttimaa RA. Teaching children with intellectual disabilities: analysis of Research-Based recommendations. JEL. 2016;5:318.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate SL, Rice MS, Stein F, et al. Knowledge of results and learning to tell the time in an adult male with an intellectual disability: a single-subject research design. Occup Ther Int. 2008;15:32–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DiPipi-Hoy C, Jitendra AK, Kern L. Effects of time management instruction on adolescents’ ability to self-manage time in a vocational setting. J Spec Educ. 2009;43:145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J, West C, Clifford D. Group interventions for anger in people with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2000;21:171–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J, Loftus M, Flint B, et al. Factors associated with the efficacy of a group intervention for anger in people with intellectual disabilities. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44:305–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willner P, Rose J, Jahoda A, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idusohan-Moizer H, Sawicka A, Dendle J, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for adults with intellectual disabilities: an evaluation of the effectiveness of mindfulness in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015;59:93–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clapton NE, Williams J, Griffith GM, et al. Finding the person you really are … on the inside”: compassion focused therapy for adults with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2018;22:135–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hronis A, Roberts R, Roberts L, et al. Fearless me! © : a feasibility case series of cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with intellectual disability. J Clin Psychol. 2019;75:919–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin G, Tsimopoulou I, Kroese BS, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) programmes for anxiety or depression in adults with intellectual disabilities: a review of the literature. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;51-52:60–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays S-J, Murphy GH, Langdon PE, et al. Group treatment for men with intellectual disability and sexually abusive behaviour: service user views. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007;32:106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janeslätt G, Ahlström SW, Granlund M. Intervention in time-processing ability, daily time management and autonomy in children with intellectual disabilities aged 10–17 years – a cluster randomised trial. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:110–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmefur M, Lidström-Holmqvist K, Roshanay AH, et al. Pilot study of let’s get organized: a group intervention for improving time management. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White S. Let’s get organized: an intervention for persons with co-occurring disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White SM, Riley A, Flom P. Assessment of time management skills (ATMS): a Practice-Based outcome questionnaire. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2013;29:215–231.
   Google Scholar
• Wingren M, Lidström-Holmqvist K, Roshanai AH, et al. One-year follow-up after the time management group intervention let’s get organized. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29:305–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström-Holmqvist K, Tollén A, Holmefur M. Toward control over time: participant experience of attending the let’s get organized group intervention. Am J Occup Ther. 2021;75:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition, text revision (DSM-5). 5th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Bäckström M, Eakman AM. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the 13-item satisfaction with daily occupations scale when used with people with mental health problems. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Gunnarsson AB. Satisfaction with daily occupations: construct validity and test–retest reliability of a screening tool for people with mental health disorders. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54:59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wästberg BA, Persson EB, Eklund M. The satisfaction with daily occupations (SDO-13) scale: psychometric properties among clients in primary care in Sweden. Occup Ther Health Care. 2016;30:29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toglia J. American occupational therapy association. Weekly calendar planning activity (WCPA) : a performance test of executive function. 2015;176:699–708. Available from: https://books.google.com/books/about/Weekly_Calendar_Planning_Activity_WCPA.html?hl=sv&id=OeT0jgEACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Toglia J, Berg C. Performance-based measure of executive function: comparison of community and at-risk youth. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67:515–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahav O, Ben-Simon A, Inbar-Weiss N, et al. Weekly calendar planning activity for university students: comparison of individuals with and without ADHD by gender. J Atten Disord. 2018;22:368–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner NW, Toglia J, Berg C. Weekly calendar planning activity (WCPA): a performance-based assessment of executive function piloted with at-risk adolescents. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66:699–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist KL, Holmefur M, Arvidsson P. Test-retest reliability of the Swedish version of the weekly calendar planning activity – a performance-based test of executive functioning. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 42:2647–2652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland J M. Statistics notes: the normal distribution. BMJ. 1995;310:298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Wetterslev J, et al. When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17:162. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolfsson P, Lindstedt H, Janeslatt G. How people with cognitive disabilities experience electronic planning devices. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37:379–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman P, Håkansson C, Björklund A. Occupational balance as used in occupational therapy: a concept analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:322–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar