A survey of research involvement and priorities among occupational therapists in Norway

References

• Rappolt S. The role of professional expertise in evidence-based occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(5):1–11. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newington L, Wells M, Adonis A, et al. A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06354-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bona L, Wenborn J, Field B, et al. Enablers and challenges to occupational therapists’ research engagement: a qualitative study. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(11):642–650. doi: 10.1177/0308022617719218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett S, McKenna K, McCluskey A, et al. Evidence for occupational therapy interventions: effectiveness research indexed in the OTseeker database. Br J Occup Ther. 2007;70(10):426–430. doi: 10.1177/030802260707001003.
   Google Scholar
• Steultjens EM, Dekker J, Bouter LM, et al. Evidence of the efficacy of occupational therapy in different conditions: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(3):247–254. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr870oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen T, Dolva AS, Hagby C, et al. Involvement in research and development projects among community-working occupational therapists in Norway. Occup Ther Health Care. 2019;33(1):22–36. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2018.1526434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness NE, Horghagen S. Ergoterapi i hundre år. Ergoterapeuten. 2017;5:36–42.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 4 Tid for handling. Personellet i en bærekraftig helse- og omsorgstjeneste. Oslo: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Watson J. Research priorities for occupational therapy in the UK. Br J Occup Ther. 2021;84(1):3–5. doi: 10.1177/0308022620976834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie L, Coppola S, Alvarez L, et al. International occupational therapy research priorities. OTJR. 2017;37(2):72–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J, Cowan K, Spring H, et al. Identifying research priorities for occupational therapy in the UK: a james lind alliance priority setting partnership. Br J Occup Ther. 2021;84(12):735–744. doi: 10.1177/03080226211026557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1341–1345. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meld. St. 18 (2012–2013). Long-term perspectives-knowledge provides opportunity. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Meld. St. 16 (2020–2021). Utdanning for omstilling-Økt arbeidslivsrelevans i høyere utdanning. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mayers CA, Nilsson ÅL, Stamm T, et al. Survey of occupational therapy/occupational science research being undertaken within the european community. Br J Occup Ther. 2008;71(1):17–22. doi: 10.1177/030802260807100104.
   Google Scholar
• Laustsen CE, Petersson P, Westergren A, et al. Involvement of professionals in research: knowledge integration, development of practice, and challenges: a group concept mapping study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00763-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer CP, Keane A, Casey D, et al. A qualitative investigation of influences on occupational therapists’ research involvement in Ireland. Br J Occup Ther. 2023;86(4):320–330. doi: 10.1177/03080226221136812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, et al. A consensus-based checklist for reporting of survey studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179–3187. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergoterapeutene. Ergoterapeutenes spesialistordning [Internett]. [updated 2021 Apr; cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://ergoterapeutene.org/spesialist/
   Google Scholar
• Ergoterapeutene. Lønnsundersøkelsen. 2022. Oversikt over medlemmenes lønns- og arbeidsforhold 2022 [updated 2023 Jun 2; cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://ergoterapeutene.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/ER3i-x9PQnhKiOeUYljItc4BAdnbBgV2TUeaGRsR1lPpIA?e=bKsPO1
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. Retningslinjer for visuell utforming av spørreskjema [Guidelines for visual design of questionnaire]. Oslo; Kongsvinger: Statistisk sentralbyrå; Statistics Norway; 2007 [cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/a/histstat/ssh/ssh_88.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Oslo. Nettskjema [Internet]. [updated 2023 Mar 10; cited 2022 May 12]. Available from: https://www.uio.no/english/services/it/adm-services/nettskjema/
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft Cooperation. Microsoft Excel; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [The qualitative research interview]. 3rd ed. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Oslo. Services for Sensitivve Data (TSD) [Internet]. [updated 2023 Jun 6; cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://i.ntnu.no/wiki/-/wiki/English/TSD+-+Services+for+Sensitive+Data#:∼:text=TSD%20is%20a%20secure%2C%20private%20cloud%20with%20a,researchers%20at%20several%20national%20research%20institutions%2C%20including%20NTNU
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Rehabilitation 2023 [Internet]. [updated 2023 Jan 30; cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rehabilitation
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko H. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being. 2nd ed. Ottawa: CAOT; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Langeland E, Førland O, Aas E, et al. Modeller for hverdagsrehabilitering- en følgeevaluering i norske kommuner. Bergen: Senter for omsorgsforskning; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Univerity- and University Colleges Acts. Act relating to universities and university colleges of 2019-06-21 nr 61; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Spesialisthelsetjenesteloven. Lov om spesialisthelsetjenesten m.m. 1999. av 1999-07-02 nr 61.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgstjenesteloven. Lov om kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester m.m. 2011. av 2011-06-24 nr 30.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. HelseOmsorg21. Et kunnskapssystem for bedre folkehelse. Nasjonal forsknings- og innovasjonsstrategi for helse og omsorg. Oslo: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet; 2014 [cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.helseomsorg21.no/Om-HelseOmsorg21/strategien/
   Google Scholar
• Aromataris E, Pearson A. The systematic review: an overview. Am J Nurs. 2014;114(3):53–58. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pighills AC, Plummer D, Harvey D, et al. Positioning occupational therapy as a discipline on the research continuum: results of a cross-sectional survey of research experience. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(4):241–251. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoong SL, Bolsewicz K, Reilly K, et al. Describing the evidence-base for research engagement by health care providers and health care organisations: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08887-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel KRW. Engagement in living. Critical perspectives on occupation, rights, and wellbeing. Ottawa: Candian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2020.
   Google Scholar