477
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

What matters to you? A mixed-method evaluation of goal setting and attainment within reablement from a client perspective

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Article: 2356548 | Received 23 Oct 2023, Accepted 14 May 2024, Published online: 28 May 2024

References

  • Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):1–14. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4.
  • Rostgaard T, Glendinning C, Gori C, et al. Livindhome: living independently at home: reforms in home care in 9 European countries. Copenhagen: SFI - Danish National Centre for Social Research; 2011.
  • Forsyth A, Molinsky J. What is aging in place? Confusions and contradictions. Housing Policy Debate. 2021;31(2):181–196. doi:10.1080/10511482.2020.1793795.
  • Bigonnesse C, Chaudhury H. The landscape of “aging in place” in gerontology literature: emergence, theoretical perspectives, and influencing factors. J Aging Environ. 2020;34(3):233–251. doi:10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875.
  • Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, et al. The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist. 2012;52(3):357–366.
  • Kuluski K, Ho JW, Hans PK, et al. Community care for people with complex care needs: bridging the gap between health and social care. Int J Integr Care. 2017;17(4):2.
  • World Health Organization. Age-friendly environments in Europe: a handbook of domains for policy action. 2017.
  • World Health Organization. Decade of healthy ageing 2020-2030. 2020.
  • Bosch-Farré C, Malagón-Aguilera MC, Ballester-Ferrando D, et al. Healthy ageing in place: enablers and barriers from the perspective of the elderly. A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6451.
  • Beard JR, Araujo de Carvalho I, Sumi Y, et al. Healthy ageing: moving forward. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(11):730.
  • Tuntland H, Parsons J, Rostgaard T. 2: perspectives on institutional characteristics, model features, and theories of reablement. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in long-term care for older people: international perspectives and future directions. Bristol: Policy Press; 2023:21–45.
  • Metzelthin SF, Rostgaard T, Parsons M, et al. Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: a delphi study. Ageing Soc. 2022;42(3):703–718. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20000999.
  • Buma LE, Vluggen S, Zwakhalen S, et al. Effects on clients’ daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: a systematic literature review. Eur J Ageing. 2022;19(4):903–929. doi:10.1007/s10433-022-00693-3.
  • Azim FT, Burton E, Ariza-Vega P, et al. Exploring behavior change techniques for reablement: a scoping review. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26(2):100401.
  • Doh D, Smith R, Gevers P. Reviewing the reablement approach to caring for older people. Ageing Soc. 2019;40(6):1371–1383. doi:10.1017/S0144686X18001770.
  • Aspinal F, Glasby J, Rostgaard T, et al. New horizons: reablement - supporting older people towards independence. Age Ageing. 2016;45(5):572–576. doi:10.1093/ageing/afw094.
  • Metzelthin SF, Zijlstra GA, van Rossum E, et al. Doing with …’ rather than ‘doing for …’ older adults: rationale and content of the ‘stay active at home’ ­programme. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(11):1419–1430. doi:10.1177/0269215517698733.
  • Mouchaers I, Verbeek H, Kempen GIJM, et al. Development and content of a community-based reablement programme (I-MANAGE): a co-creation study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(8):e070890. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070890.
  • Sims-Gould J, Tong CE, Wallis-Mayer L, et al. Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions With older adults in receipt of home care: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(8):653–663. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.070.
  • Ryburn B, Wells Y, Foreman P. Enabling independence: restorative approaches to home care provision for frail older adults. Health Soc Care Commun. 2009;17(3):225–234. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00809.x.
  • Tessier A, Beaulieu M-D, McGinn CA, et al. Effectiveness of reablement: a systematic review [efficacité de l’autonomisation: une revue systématique]. Healthcare Pol. 2016;11(4):49–59.
  • Pettersson C, Iwarsson S. Evidence-based interventions involving occupational therapists are needed in re-ablement for older community-living people: a systematic review. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(5):273–285.
  • Cochrane A, Furlong M, McGilloway S, et al. Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:cd010825.
  • Legg L, Gladman J, Drummond A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement services. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(8):741–749. doi:10.1177/0269215515603220.
  • Whitehead PJ, Worthington EJ, Parry RH, et al. Interventions to reduce dependency in personal activities of daily living in community dwelling adults who use homecare services: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(11):1064–1076. doi:10.1177/0269215514564894.
  • Lewin G, Parsons J, O’Connell H, et al. 5: does reablement improve client-level outcomes of participants? An investigation of the current evidence. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in long-term care for older people: international perspectives and future directions. Bristol: Policy Press; 2023. p. 93–117.
  • Mulquiny L, Oakman J. Exploring the experience of reablement: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of older people’s and carers’ views. Health Soc Care Commun. 2022;30(5):e1471–e1483. doi:10.1111/hsc.13837.
  • Tuntland H, Doh D, Ranner M, et al. 6: examining client-level outcomes and instruments in reablement. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in long-term care for older people: international perspectives and future directions. Bristol: Policy Press; 2023. p. 118–136.
  • Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57(2):82–87. doi:10.1177/000841749005700207.
  • Tuntland H, Kjeken I, Folkestad B, et al. Everyday occupations prioritised by older adults participating in reablement. A cross-sectional study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(4):248–258.
  • Bergström A, Vik K, Haak M, et al. The jigsaw puzzle of activities for mastering daily life; service recipients and professionals’ perceptions of gains and changes attributed to reablement - A qualitative meta-synthesis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2023;30(5):604–615.
  • Wilde A, Glendinning C. ‘If they’re helping me then how can I be independent?’ The perceptions and experience of users of home-care re-ablement services. Health Soc Care Commun. 2012;20(6):583–590. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01072.x.
  • Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Chapter 3: core mixed methods designs. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2017. p. 51–99.
  • Huber M, van Vliet M, Giezenberg M, et al. Towards a ‘patient-centred’ operationalisation of the new dynamic concept of health: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e010091. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010091.
  • McColl MA, Denis CB, Douglas KL, et al. A clinically significant difference on the COPM: a review. Can J Occup Ther. 2023;90(1):92–102. doi:10.1177/00084174221142177.
  • Tuntland H, Aaslund MK, Espehaug B, et al. Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15(1):145. doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0142-9.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Magne TA, Vik K. Promoting participation in daily activities through reablement: a qualitative study. Rehabil Res Pract. 2020;2020:6506025–6506027. doi:10.1155/2020/6506025.
  • Stausholm MN, Pape-Haugaard L, Hejlesen OK, et al. Reablement professionals’ perspectives on client characteristics and factors associated with successful home-based reablement: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):665. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06625-8.
  • Haak M, Fänge A, Iwarsson S, et al. Home as a signification of independence and autonomy: experiences among very old swedish people. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(1):16–24. doi:10.1080/11038120601024929.
  • Moe C, Brinchmann B. Optimising capasities. A service user and caregiver perspective on reablement. Ground Theory Rev. 2016;15:25–40.
  • Jokstad K, Hauge S, Landmark BT, et al. Control as a core component of user involvement in reablement: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1079–1088. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S269200.
  • World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
  • Schellinger SE, Anderson EW, Frazer MS, et al. Patient self-defined goals: essentials of person-centered care for serious illness. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018;35(1):159–165. doi:10.1177/1049909117699600.
  • Vermunt NP, Harmsen M, Elwyn G, et al. A three-goal model for patients with multimorbidity: a qualitative approach. Health Expect. 2018;21(2):528–538.
  • Boeykens D, Boeckxstaens P, De Sutter A, et al. Goal-oriented care for patients with chronic conditions or multimorbidity in primary care: a scoping review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0262843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262843.
  • Hjelle KM, Tuntland H, Førland O, et al. Driving forces for home-based reablement; a qualitative study of older adults’ experiences. Health Soc Care Commun. 2017;25(5):1581–1589. doi:10.1111/hsc.12324.
  • Rose A, Rosewilliam S, Soundy A. Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):65–75. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.030.
  • Langeland E, Tuntland H, Folkestad B, et al. A multicenter investigation of reablement in Norway: a clinical controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1038-x.
  • Rostgaard T, Tuntland H, Parsons J. 1: introduction: the concept, rationale, and implications of reablement. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in long-term care for older people: international perspectives and future directions. Bristol: Policy Press; 2023. p. 3–20.
  • Oliver D, Foot C, Humphries R. Making our health and care systems fit for an ageing population. London: King’s Fund London; 2014.
  • Zingmark M, Tuntland H, Burton E. 7: reablement as a cost-effective option from a health economic perspective. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in long-term care for older people: international perspectives and future directions. Bristol: Policy Press; 2023. p. 137–160.
  • Van Calster B, Steyerberg EW, Collins GS, et al. Consequences of relying on statistical significance: some illustrations. Eur J Clin Invest. 2018;48(5):e12912. doi:10.1111/eci.12912.