Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’

References

• Adams , D. C. 1999 . Methods for shape analysis of landmark data from articulated structures . Evol. Ecol. Res. , 1 : 959 – 970 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams , D. C. and Rohlf , F. J. 2000 . Ecological character displacement in Plethodom biomechanical differences found from a geometric morphometric study . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 97 : 4106 – 4111 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams , D. C. and Rosenberg , M. S. 1998 . Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995) . Syst. Bid. , 47 : 168 – 173 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackith , R. and Reyment , R. A. 1971 . Multivariate morphometrics , New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 1986 . Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions . Stat. Sci. , 1 : 181 – 222 .
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 1991 . Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 1996a . Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis . Bull. Math. Biol. , 58 : 313 – 365 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 1996b . “ Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics ” . In Advances in morphometrics , Edited by: Marcus , L. F. , Corti , M. , Loy , A. , Naylor , G. and Slice , D. 131 – 151 . New York : Plenum Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 1996c . “ A standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data ” . In Advances in morphometrics , Edited by: Marcus , L. F. , Corti , M. , Loy , A. , Naylor , G. and Slice , D. 153 – 168 . New York : Plenum Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 1997 . Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape . Med. Image Anal. , 1 : 225 – 243 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 1998 . A hundred years of morphometrics . Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. , 44 : 7 – 59 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 2000 . Creases as local features of deformation grids . Med. Image Anal. , 4 : 93 – 110 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. 2002 . “ Creases as morphometric characters ” . In Morphology, shape and phylogeny , Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol. Ser. 64 Edited by: MacLeod , N. and Forey , P. L. 139 – 174 . London : Taylor and Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. , Chernoff , B. , Elder , R. L. , Humphries , J. M. Jr. , Smith , G. R. and Strauss , R. E. 1985 . Morphometrics in evolutionary biology , Special publication 15 Philadelphia : Academy of Natural Sciences Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. , Gunz , P. , Mitterocker , P. , Prossinger , H. , Schafer , K. and Seidler , H. 2003 . Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution . J. Human Evol. , 44 : 167 – 187 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. , Schäfer , K. , Prossinger , H. , Seidler , H. , Fieder , M. , Stringer , C. , Weber , G. W. , Arsuaga , J.‐L. , Slice , D. E. , Rohlf , F. J. , Recheis , W. , Mariam , A. J. and Marcus , L. F. 1999 . Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern Homo by morphometric analysis . Anat. Rec. , 257 : 217 – 224 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bookstein , F. L. and Smith , B. R. Inverting development: geometric singularity theory in embryology . Proc. S.P.I.E. Mathematical modeling, estimation, and imaging , Edited by: Wilson , D. , Tagare , H. , Bookstein , F. , Préteauz , F. and Dougherty , E. vol. 4121 , pp. 139 – 174 .
   Google Scholar
• Bumpus , H. C. 1898 . The elimination of the unfit as illustrated by the introduced sparrow Passer domesticus . Biol. Lect. Mar. Biol. Lab. Woods Hole , 11 : 209 – 226 .
   Google Scholar
• Caldecutt , W. C. and Adams , D. C. 1998 . Morphometrics of trophic osteology in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus . Copeia , 1998 : 827 – 838 .
   Google Scholar
• Dryden , I. L. and Mardia , K. V. 1998 . Statistical shape analysis , New York : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein , J. 1988 . Phylogenies and quantitative characters . Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. , 192 : 445 – 471 .
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein , J. 2002 . “ Quantitative characters, phylogenies, and morphometrics ” . In Morphology, shape and phylogeny , Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol. Ser. 64 Edited by: MacLeod , N. and Forey , P. L. 27 – 44 . London : Taylor and Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Fink , W. L. and Zelditch , M. L. 1995 . Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: a reassessment of the piranha genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei) . Syst. Biol. , 44 : 343 – 360 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , R. A. 1935 . The logic of inductive inference . J. R. Stat. Soc. , 98 : 39 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Gharaibeh , W. S. , Rohlf , F. J. , Slice , D. E. and DeLisi , L. E. 2000 . A geometric morphometric assessment of change in midline brain structural shape following a first episode of schizophrenia . Biol. Psychiatry , 48 : 398 – 405 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall , C. R. 1991 . Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape . J. R. Stat. Soc. B , 53 : 285 – 339 .
   Google Scholar
• Gower , J. C. 1975 . Generalized Procrustes analysis . Psychometrika , 40 : 33 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling , H. 1933 . Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components . J. Educ. Psychol. , 24 : 417 – 441 . 498 – 520 .
   Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur , P. 1963 . The generalization of the allometry equation . Biometrics , 19 : 497 – 499 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungers , W. L. , Falsetti , A. B. and Wall , C. E. 1995 . Shape, relative size, and size‐adjustments in morphometrics . Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. , 38 : 137 – 161 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall , D. G. 1977 . The diffusion of shape . Adv. Appl. Prob. , 9 : 428 – 430 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall , D. G. 1984 . Shape‐manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces . Bull. London Math. Soc. , 16 : 81 – 121 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall , D. G. 1985 . Exact distributions for shapes of random triangles in convex sets . Adv. Appl. Prob. , 17 : 308 – 329 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent , J. T. 1994 . The complex Bingham distribution and shape analysis . J. R. Stat. Soc. B , 56 : 285 – 299 .
   Google Scholar
• Kent , J. T. and Mardia , K. V. 2001 . Shape, Procrustes tangent projections and bilateral symmetry . Biometrika , 88 : 469 – 485 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg , C. P. and Leamy , L. J. 2001 . Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible . Evolution , 55 : 2342 – 2352 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg , C. P. , Leamy , L. J. , Routman , E. J. and Cheverud , J. M. 2001 . Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics . Genetics , 157 : 785 – 802 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg , C. P. and Mclntyre , G. S. 1998 . Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods . Evolution , 52 : 1363 – 1375 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande , R. 1979 . Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry . Evolution , 33 : 402 – 416 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lele , S. 1993 . Euclidean distance matrix analysis: estimation of mean form and form differences . Math. Geol. , 25 : 573 – 602 .
   Google Scholar
• Lele , S. and Cole , T. M. III . 1995 . “ Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a statistical review ” . In Current issues in statistical shape analysis , Edited by: Mardia , K. V. and Gill , C. A. vol. 3 , 49 – 53 . Leeds : University of Leeds .
   Google Scholar
• Lele , S. and Cole , T. M. III . 1996 . A new test for shape differences when variance‐covariance matrices are unequal . J. Human Evol. , 31 : 193 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lele , S. and Richtsmeier , J. T. 1991 . Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data . Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. , 86 : 415 – 427 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lele , S. and Richtsmeier , J. T. 2001 . An invariant approach to statistical analysis of shapes , New York : Chapman & Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Little , R. J. A. and Rubin , D. B. 1987 . Statistical analysis with missing data , New York : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod , N. 2002 . “ Phylogenetic signals in morphometric data ” . In Morphology, shape and phylogeny , Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol. Ser. 64 Edited by: MacLeod , N. and Forey , P. L. 100 – 138 . London : Taylor and Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Marcus , L. F. Traditional morphometrics . Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop . Edited by: Rohlf , F. J. and Bookstein , F. L. pp. 77 – 122 . Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Museum of Zoology . Spec. Publ. No. 2
   Google Scholar
• Marcus , L. F. , Corti , M. , Loy , A. , Naylor , G. J. P. and Slice , D. E. 1996 . Advances in morphometrics , New York : Plenum Press .
   Google Scholar
• Marcus , L. F. , Hingst‐Zaher , E. and Zaher , H. 2000 . Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals . Hystrix , 11 : 27 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Mardia , K. V. , Bookstein , F. L. and Moreton , I. J. 2000 . Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes . Biometrika , 87 : 285 – 300 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro , L. R. , Diniz‐Filho , J. A. R. , dos Reis , S. F. and Araújo , E. D. 2002 . Geometric estimates of heritability in biological shape . Evolution , 56 : 563 – 572 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer , A. R. 1996 . Waltzing with asymmetry . BioScience , 46 : 518 – 532 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer , A. R. and Strobeck , C. 1986 . Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns . Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. , 17 : 391 – 421 .
   Google Scholar
• Pearson , K. 1895 . Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. , 58 : 240 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Pearson , K. 1901 . On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space . Phil. Mag. Ser. 6 , 2 : 559 – 572 .
   Google Scholar
• Rao , C. R. and Suryawanshi , S. 1996 . Statistical analysis of shape of objects based on landmark data . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 93 : 12132 – 12136 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao , C. R. and Suryawanshi , S. 1998 . Statistical analysis of shape through triangulation of landmarks: a study of sexual dimorphism in hominids . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 95 : 4121 – 4125 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyment , R. A. 1991 . Multidimensional paleobiology , New York : Pergamon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. 1986 . Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates . Math. Geol. , 18 : 845 – 854 .
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. Fitting curves to outlines . Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop . Edited by: Rohlf , F. J. and Bookstein , F. L. pp. 167 – 177 . Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Museum of Zoology . Spec. Publ. No. 2
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. 1998 . On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny . Syst. Biol. , 47 : 147 – 158 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. 1999 . Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces . J. Class. , 16 : 197 – 223 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. 2000a . Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods . Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. , 111 : 463 – 478 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. 2000b . On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods . Hystrix , 11 : 9 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. 2002 . “ Geometric morphometrics and phylogeny ” . In Morphology, shape and phylogeny , Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol. Ser. 64 Edited by: MacLeod , N. and Forey , P. L. 175 – 193 . London : Taylor and Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. 2003 . Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in morphometrics . J. Human Evol. , 44 : 665 – 683 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. and Bookstein , F. L. 2003 . Computing the uniform component of shape variation . Syst. Biol. , 52 : 66 – 69 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. and Marcus , L. F. 1993 . A revolution in morphometrics . Trends Ecol. Evol. , 8 : 129 – 132 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf , F. J. and Slice , D. E. 1990 . Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks . Syst. Zool. , 39 : 40 – 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Rüber , L. and Adams , D. C. 2001 . Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophic morphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika . J. Evol. Biol. , 14 : 325 – 332 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slice , D. E. 1996 . “ Three‐dimensional, generalized resistant fitting and the comparison of least‐squares and resistant‐fit residuals ” . In Advances in morphometrics , Edited by: Marcus , L. F. , Corti , M. , Loy , A. , Naylor , G. and Slice , D. 179 – 199 . New York : Plenum Press .
   Google Scholar
• Slice , D. E. 2001 . Landmark coordinates aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space . Syst. Biol. , 50 : 141 – 149 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small , C. G. 1996 . The statistical theory of shape , New York : Springer‐Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg , P. 1989 . Shape and size‐constrained principal component analysis . Syst. Zool. , 38 : 166 – 168 .
   Google Scholar
• Swiderski , D. L. , Zelditch , M. L. and Fink , W. L. 2002 . “ Comparability, morphometrics and phylogenetic systematics ” . In Morphology, shape and phylogeny , Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol. Ser. 64 Edited by: MacLeod , N. and Forey , P. L. 67 – 99 . London : Taylor and Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Thompson , D. W. 1917 . On growth and form , London : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Walker , J. A. 2000 . The ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known covariance matrix . Syst. Biol. , 49 : 686 – 696 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelditch , M. L. , Swiderski , D. L. and Fink , W. L. 2000 . “ Discovery of phylogenetic characters in morphometric data ” . In Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data , Edited by: Weins , J. J. 37 – 83 . Washington : Smithsonian Institution Press .
   Google Scholar