Effect of an alien turtle predator on movement activity of European brown frog tadpoles

References

• Alford RA. 1999. Ecology: Resource use, competition, and predation. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R, editors. Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press. pp. 240–278.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida E, Nunes A, Andrade P, Alves S, Guerreiro C, Rebelo R. 2011. Antipredator responses of two anurans towards native and exotic predators. Amphibia-Reptilia 32:341–350. doi:10.1163/017353711X579849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anholt BR, Negovetic S, Rauter C, Som C. 2005. Predator complement determines the relative success of tadpoles of the Rana esculenta complex. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7:733–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan AR, Smith GR. 2007. The effect of group size on the responses of wood frog tadpoles to fish. The American Midland Naturalist 158:79–84. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2007)158[79:TEOGSO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry MJ, Syal S. 2013. Metabolic responses of tadpoles to chemical predation cues. Hydrobiologia 700:267–276. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1236-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaupre SB, Jacobson ER, Lillywhite HB, Zamudio K. 2004. Guidelines for use of live amphibians and reptiles in field and laboratory research. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, approved by board of Governors.
   Google Scholar
• Bell WJ. 1991. Searching behaviour: The behavioural ecology of finding resources. 1st ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bolker B, Holyoak M, Krivan V, Rowe L, Schmitz OJ. 2003. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101e1114. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1101:CTAESO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brejcha J. 2015. Želva nádherná - aktuální status druhu v České republice. In: Moravec J, editor. Plazi (Reptilia) - Fauna ČR. Praha, Česká republika: Academia. pp. 531.
   Google Scholar
• Brown C, Davidson T, Laland K. 2003. Environmental enrichment and prior experience of live prey improve foraging behaviour in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 63:187–196. doi:10.1111/jfb.2003.63.issue-s1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulen BJ, Distel CA. 2011. Carbaryl concentration gradients in realistic environments and their influence on our understanding of the tadpole food web. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 60:343–350. doi:10.1007/s00244-010-9630-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadi A, Joly P. 2003. Competition for basking places between the endangered European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) and the introduced red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 81:1392–1398. doi:10.1139/z03-108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadi A, Joly P. 2004. Impact of the introduction of the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) on survival rates of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis). Biodiversity and Conservation 13:2511–2518. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000048451.07820.9c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakıcı Ö. 2013. Carbaryl-induced histopathologic alterations on testes of Levantine frog, Pelophylax bedriagae (Anura: Ranidae). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 91:96–101. doi:10.1007/s00128-013-1010-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers DP, Smith RJF. 1994. Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, acquire predator recognition when alarm substance is associated with the sight of unfamiliar fish. Animal Behaviour 48:597–605. doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers DP, Smith RJF. 1995. Free—Living fathead minnows rapidly learn to recognize pike as predators. Journal of Fish Biology 46:949–954. doi:10.1111/jfb.1995.46.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers DP, Wildy EL, Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR. 2001. Avoidance response of juvenile pacific treefrogs to chemical cues of introduced predatory bullfrogs. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27:1667–1676. doi:10.1023/A:1010418526991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox GW. 2004. Alien species and evolution: The evolutionary ecology of exotic plants, animals, microbes, and interacting native species. 1st ed. Washington, USA: Island Press. pp. 377.
   Google Scholar
• DAISIE (ed.). 2009. Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Darwish TL, Mirza RS, Leduc A, Brown GE. 2005. Acquired recognition of novel predator odour cocktails by juvenile glowlight tetras. Animal Behaviour 70:83–89. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egea-Serrano A, Tejedo M, Torralva M. 2011. Behavioral responses of the Iberian waterfrog, Pelophylax perezi (Seoane, 1885), to three nitrogenous compounds in laboratory conditions. Ecotoxicology 20:1246–1257. doi:10.1007/s10646-011-0673-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst CH, Lovich JE. 2009. Turtles of the United States and Canada. 2nd ed. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 827.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari MC, Wisenden BD, Chivers DP. 2010. Chemical ecology of predator-prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: A review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88:698–724. doi:10.1139/Z10-029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficetola GF, Monti A, Padoe-Schippoa E. 2002. Prima segnalazione di riproduzione di Trachemys scripta elegans nel Delta del Po. Annali del Museo civico di Storia naturale di Ferrara 5:125–128.
   Google Scholar
• García-Muñoz E, Guerrero F, Parra G. 2011. Larval escape behavior in anuran amphibians as a wetland rapid pollution biomarker. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 44:109–123. doi:10.1080/10236244.2011.557855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden D, Smith G, Rettig J. 2000. Effects of age and group size on habitat selection and activity level in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies 26:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths RA, Schley L, Sharp PE, Dennis JL, Roman A. 1998. Behavioural responses of Mallorcan midwife toad tadpoles to natural and unnatural snake predators. Animal Behaviour 55:207–214. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossie TJ, Murray DL. 2012. Assessing behavioural and morphological responses of frog tadpoles to temporal variability in predation risk. Journal of Zoology 288:275–282. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00955.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenegger D. 2006. Die heimische Europäische Sumpfschildkröte (Emys orbicularis) und die zunehmende Problematik durch illegal ausgesetzte Rotwangen-Schmuckschildkröten (Trachemys scripta elegans). Österreichs Fischerei 59:93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kats LB, Dill LM. 1998. The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR. 1997. Population differences in responses of red-legged frogs (Rana aurora) to introduced bullfrogs. Ecology 78:1752–1760. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1752:PDIROR]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP, Blaustein AR. 1996. The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 52:1237–1245. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopack CJ, Broder ED, Lepak JM, Fetherman ER, Angeloni LM. 2015. Behavioral responses of a highly domesticated, predator naïve rainbow trout to chemical cues of predation. Fisheries Research 169:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus F. 2009. Alien reptiles and amphibians: A scientific compendium and analysis. 1st ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laurila A, Kujasalo J. 1999. Habitat duration, predation risk and phenotypic plasticity in common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:1123–1132. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00354.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenda M, Witek M, Skorka P, Moron D, Woyciechowski M. 2013. Invasive alien plants affect grassland ant communities, colony size and foraging behaviour. Biological Invasions 15:2403–2414. doi:10.1007/s10530-013-0461-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher JM, Werner EE, Denver RJ. 2013. Stress hormones mediate predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in amphibian tadpoles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 280:2012–3075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure KV, Mora JW, Smith GR. 2009. Effects of light and group size on the activity of wood frog tadpoles (Rana sylvatica) and their response to a shadow stimulus. Acta Herpetologica 4:103–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicieza AG. 1999. Context-dependent aggregation in Common Frog Rana temporaria tadpoles: Influence of developmental stage, predation risk and social environment. Functional Ecology 13:852–858. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00375.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noldus Information Technology. 1997. Ethovision: Video tracking, motion analysis and behavior recognition system [Reference Manual]. Version 1.90. Wagenigen, Netherlands: Noldus Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes AL, Richter-Boix A, Laurila A, Rebelo R. 2012. Do anuran larvae respond behaviourally to chemical cues from an invasive crayfish predator? A community-wide study. Oecologia 171:115–127. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2389-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci EM, MacIsaac HJ, Ricciardi A. 2013. Origin matters: Alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumers. Diversity and Distributions 19:988–995. doi:10.1111/ddi.12073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker JD, Torchin ME, Hufbauer RA, Lemoine NP, Alba C, Blumenthal DM, Bossdorf O, Byers JE, Dunn AM, Heckman RW. 2013. Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges? Ecology 94:985–994. doi:10.1890/12-1810.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson SH, Avery HW, Kilham SS, Velinsky DJ, Spotila JR. 2013. Stable isotopes of C and N reveal habitat dependent dietary overlap between native and introduced turtles Pseudemys rubriventris and Trachemys scripta. Plos One 8:e62891. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson SH, Avery HW, Spotila JR. 2015. Juvenile invasive red-eared slider turtles negatively impact the growth of native turtles: Implications for global freshwater turtle populations. Biological Conservation 186:115–121. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo-Cavia N, Gonzalo A, López P, Martín J. 2010. Predator recognition of native but not invasive turtle predators by naïve anuran tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 80:461–466. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo-Cavia N, Lopez P, Martin J. 2009. Interspecific differences in chemosensory responses of freshwater turtles: Consequences for competition between native and invasive species. Biological Invasions 11:431–440. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9260-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol-Buxó E, San Sebastián O, Garriga N, Llorente GA. 2013. How does the invasive/native nature of species influence tadpoles’ plastic responses to predators? Oikos 122:19–29. doi:10.1111/more.2013.122.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay NF, Ng PKA, O’Riordan RM, Chou LM. 2007. The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Asia: A review. In: Gherardi F, editor. Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution and threats. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Relyea RA. 2001. Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82: 523–540. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0523:MABPOL]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relyea RA. 2002. Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: Consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecological Monographs 72: 523–540. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0523:CIPITC]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relyea RA. 2004. Fine-tuned phenotypes: Tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85: 172–179. doi:10.1890/03-0169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rödder D, Schmidtlein S, Veith M, Loetters S. 2009. Alien invasive slider turtle in unpredicted habitat: A matter of niche shift or of predictors studied? Plos One 4: e7843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotherham ID, Lambert RA. 2011. Invasive and introduced plants and animals: Human perceptions, attitudes, and approaches to management. 1st ed. Washington, DC, USA: Earthscan. pp. 352.
   Google Scholar
• Rot-Nikcevic I, Taylor CN, Wassersug RJ. 2006. The role of images of conspecifics as visual cues in the development and behavior of larval anurans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60: 19–25. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0133-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalera R. 2009. Trachemys scripta (Schoepff), common slider (Emydidae, Reptilia). In: DAISIE, editor. Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 374.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O. 2004. Trophic cascades: The primacy of trait‐mediated indirect interactions. Ecology Letters 7: 153–163. doi:10.1111/ele.2004.7.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Pintor LM, Preisser E, Rehege JS, Vonesh JR. 2010. Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119: 610–621. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18039.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Škaloudová B, Zemek R, Křivan V. 2007. The effect of predation risk on an acarine system. Animal Behaviour 74: 813–821. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socha R, Zemek R. 2003. Wing morph-related differences in the walking pattern and dispersal in a flightless bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Oikos 100: 35–42. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12100.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieler M. 2005. Can aggregation behaviour of Phrynomantis microps tadpoles reduce predation risk? The Herpetological Journal 15: 153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatSoft Inc. 2010. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 9.1. Available: www.statistica.com. Accessed Jul 2014 14.
   Google Scholar
• Van Buskirk J. 2001. Specific induced responses to different predator species in anuran larvae. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 482–489. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00282.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA. 2000. Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 2149–2158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer A, Schausberger P. 2013a. Phenotypic plasticity in anti-intraguild predator strategies: Mite larvae adjust their behaviours according to vulnerability and predation risk. Experimental and Applied Acarology 60: 95–115. doi:10.1007/s10493-012-9624-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer A, Schausberger P. 2013b. Integration of multiple cues allows threat-sensitive anti-intraguild predator responses in predatory mites. Behaviour 150: 115–132. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner EE, Peacor SD. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083e1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar