Genetic differentiation and gene flow between wild and cultivated Prunus avium: An analysis of molecular genetic evidence at a regional scale

REFERENCES

• AgarZ, HalaszJ, ErcisliS. 2011. Genetic relationships among wild and cultivated blackberries (Rubus caucasicus L.) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Plant Biosyst145(2): 347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllendorfFW, LearyRF, SpruellP, WenburgJK. 2001. The problems with hybrids: Setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol16: 613–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndersonEC, ThompsonEA. 2002. A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics160: 1217–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aravanopoulos AF, Avramidou E, Ganopoulos I. 2008. Genetics of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) in Greece. Growing Valuable Broadleaved Tree Species, 6–8 October 2008, Freiburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• AravanopoulosFA. 2011. Genetic monitoring in natural perennial plant populations. Botany89: 75–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaud-HaondS., BelkhirK.. 2007. Genclone: a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization. Mol Ecol Notes7: 15–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AvramidouE, GanopoulosIV, AravanopoulosFA. 2010. DNA fingerprinting of elite Greek wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using microsatellite markers. Forestry83: 527–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BartonNH, SlatkinM. 1986. A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity56: 409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BehreK. 1978. Formenkreise von Prunus domestica L. von der Wikingerzeit bis in die frü he Neuzeit nach Fruchtsteinen aus Haithabu und Alt-Schleswig. Berichte Deutsche Bot Gesellsc91: 161–179.
   Google Scholar
• BenetkaV, MottlJ, VackovaK, PospiskovaM, DubskyM. 1999. Estimation of the introgression level in Populus nigra L. populations by means of isozyme gene markersSauerländer: Allemagne. Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• BrownAHD, SchoenDJ. 1992. Plant population genetic structure and biological conservation. In: SandlundOT, HindarK, BrownAHD, editors. Conservation of biodiversity for sustainable development. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. pp. 88–104.
   Google Scholar
• BurgarellaC, LorenzoZ, Jabbour-ZahabR, LumaretR, GuichouxE, PetitRJ, et al. 2009. Detection of hybrids in nature: Application to oaks (Quercus suber and Q. ilex). Heredity102: 442–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChatzicharisisI, Mainou-PlerouA, ChatzitheodorouI, KazantzisK. 2000. Naousa: Institute of Pomology. Monograph of sweet cherry and sour cherry cultivars evaluated and cultivated in Greece.
   Google Scholar
• ClarkeJB, TobuttKR. 2003. Development and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites from Prunus avium ‘Napoleon’. Mol Ecol Notes3: 578–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoartE, VekemansX, SmuldersMJM, WagnerI, Van HuylenbroeckJ, Van BockstaeleE, et al. 2003. Genetic variation in the endangered wild apple (Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill.) in Belgium as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism and microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol12: 845–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiamondJ. 2002. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature418: 700–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobzhansky T. 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process, New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 274–276.
   Google Scholar
• DowneySL, IezzoniAF. 2000. Polymorphic D.N.A. markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci125: 76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoyleJ, DoyleJ. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amount of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull19: 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• EllstrandNC, ElamDR. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst24: 217–242.
   Google Scholar
• GanopoulosIV, AvramidouE, FasoulaDA, DiamantidisG, AravanopoulosFA. 2010. Assessing inter- and intra-cultivar variation in Greek Prunus avium by SSR markers. Plant Genet Res8: 242–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GanopoulosI, AravanopoulosF, ArgiriouA, KalivasA, TsaftarisA. 2011a. Is the genetic diversity of small scattered forest tree populations at the southern limits of their range more prone to stochastic events? A wild cherry case study by microsatellite-based markers. Tree Genet Gen7: 1299–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GanopoulosVI, KazantzisK, ChatzicharisisI, KarayiannisI, TsaftarisA. 2011b. Genetic diversity, structure and fruit trait associations in Greek sweet cherry cultivars using microsatellite-based (SSR/ISSR) and morpho-physiological markers. Euphytica181: 237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarnierS, AlibertP, AudiotP, PrieurB, RasplusJY. 2004. Isolation by distance and sharp discontinuities in gene frequencies: Implications for the phylogeography of an alpine insect species, Carabus solieri. Mol Ecol13: 1883–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoudetJ. 1995. FSTAT (version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered86: 485–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HedrickUP. 1915. The cherries of New York. Albany, NY: J B Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• HeinzeB. 1997. A PCR marker for a Populus deltoides allele and its use in studying introgression with native European Populus nigra. Belg J Bot129: 123–130.
   Google Scholar
• HokansonSC, Szewc-McFaddenAK, LamboyWF, McFersonJR. 1998. Microsatellite (SSR) markers reveal genetic identities, genetic diversity and relationships in a Malus ×  domestica borkh. core subset collection. Theor Appl Genet97: 671–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IketaniH, YamamotoT, KatayamaH, UematsuC, MaseN, SatoY. 2010. Introgression between native and prehistorically naturalized (archaeophytic) wild pear (Pyrus spp.) populations in northern Tohoku, northeast Japan. Conserv Genet11: 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KalinowskiST. 2005. hp-rare 1.0: A computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes5: 187–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KalinowskiS, TaperM. 2006. Maximum likelihood estimation of the frequency of null alleles at microsatellite loci. Conserv Genet7: 991–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarietteS, TavaudM, ArunyawatU, CapdevilleG, MillanM, SalinF. 2010. Population structure and genetic bottleneck in sweet cherry estimated with SSRs and the gametophytic self-incompatibility locus. BMC Genetics11: 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshallRE. 1954. Cherries and cherry products. Economic crops. 5. New York: Inter-science.
   Google Scholar
• OliveiraR, GodinhoR, RandiE, FerrandN, AlvesP. 2008. Molecular analysis of hybridisation between wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) in Portugal: Implications for conservation. Conserv Genet9: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OrtegoJ, BonalR. 2010. Natural hybridisation between kermes (Quercus coccifera L.) and holm oaks (Q. ilex L.) revealed by microsatellite markers. Plant Biol12: 234–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaetkauD, SladeR, BurdenM, EstoupA. 2004. Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: A simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol Ecol13: 55–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeakallR, SmousePE. 2006. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes6: 288–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PiryS, AlapetiteA, CornuetJM, PaetkauD, BaudouinL, EstoupA. 2004. GENECLASS2: A software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered95: 536–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PotterD. 2011. Prunus: Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resourcesBerlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 129–145.
   Google Scholar
• PritchardJ, StephensM, DonnellyP. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics155: 945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Wen W. 2002. Documentation for Structure software: Version 2, Available: http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu.
   Google Scholar
• RandiE. 2008. Detecting hybridization between wild species and their domesticated relatives. Mol Ecol17: 285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RannalaB, MountainJ. 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA94: 9197–9201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaymondM, RoussetF. 1995. GENEPOP (Version1.2) - Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered86: 248–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RhymerJM, SimberloffD. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Ann Rev Ecol Syst27: 83–109.
   Google Scholar
• RiceR. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution43: 223–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SanouH, LovettPN, BouvetJ-M. 2005. Comparison of quantitative and molecular variation in agroforestry populations of the shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn) in Mali. Mol Ecol14: 2601–2610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlatkinM. 1985. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution39: 53–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoeckelS, GrangeJ, Fernandez-ManjarresJ, BilgerI, Frascaria-LacosteN, MarietteS. 2006. Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species. Mol Ecol15: 2109–2118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanksleySD, McCouchSR. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science277: 1063–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TestolinR, MarrazzoT, CiprianiG, QuartaR, VerdeI, DettoriMT, et al. 2000. Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome43: 512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VähäJ-P, PrimmerCR. 2006. Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Mol Ecol15: 63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VaughanSP, CottrellJE, MoodleyDJ, ConnollyT, RussellK. 2007. Distribution and fine-scale spatial-genetic structure in British wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Heredity98: 274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VaughanSP, RussellK. 2004. Characterization of novel microsatellites and development of multiplex PCR for large-scale population studies in wild cherry, Prunus avium. Mol Ecol Notes4: 429–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeirB, CockerhamC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution38: 1358–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrightS. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics28: 114–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZaharievaM, MonneveuxP. 2006. Spontaneous hybridization between bread wheat (L.) and its wild relatives in Europe. Crop Sci46: 512–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZeccaG, De MattiaF, LovicuG, LabraM, SalaF, GrassiF. 2010. Wild grapevine: silvestris, hybrids or cultivars that escaped from vineyards? Molecular evidence in Sardinia. Plant Biol12: 558–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZoharyD, HopfM. 2000. Fruit trees and nuts. Domestication of plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ZoharyD, Spiegel-RoyP. 1975. Beginnings of fruit growing in old world. Science187: 319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsuffa L, Aravanopoulos AF. 1989. Genetics and breeding of Salicaceae at the University of Toronto. In: Recent developments in poplar selection and propagation institute of forest tree breeding. Hann Munden, Federal Republic of Germany, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar