An information system on Italian liverworts, hornworts and mosses

REFERENCES

• AleffiM, TacchiR, Cortini PedrottiC. 2008. Check-list of the hornworts, liverworts and mosses of Italy. Bocconea22: 1–256.
   Google Scholar
• BerendsohnWG, ChavanV, MacklinJA. 2010. Recommendations of the GBIF task group on the global strategy and action plan for the mobilisation of natural history collections data. J Biodiversity Informatics7: 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• BrachAR, SongH. 2005. ActKey: A web-based interactive identification key program. Taxon54: 1041–1046.
   Google Scholar
• BrehmJ, MaxtedN, Martins-LouçãoM, Ford-LloydB. 2010. New approaches for establishing conservation priorities for socio-economically important plant species. Biodiv Conserv19: 2715–2740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrummitRK, PowellCE, editors. 1992. Authors of plant names. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman AD. 2005. Uses of primary species-occurrence data, version 1.0, Report for the global biodiversity information facility, Copenhagen..
   Google Scholar
• CrosbyMR, MagillRE, BauerCR. 1992. Index of mosses, 1963–1989. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden42: 1–646 (see pages 1–11).
   Google Scholar
• Dallwitz MJ, Paine TA, Zurcher EJ. 2002. Interactive identification using the Internet, Available: http://www.delta-intkey.com/www/netid.htm [Accessed Jan 2012 24]..
   Google Scholar
• FeeleyKJ, SilmanMR. 2011. The data void in modeling current and future distributions of tropical species. Glob Change Biol17: 626–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallagherRV, BeaumontLJ, HughesL, LeishmanMR. 2010. Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. J Ecol98: 790–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GBIF [Internet]. Global biodiversity information facility, Available: http://www.gbif.org [Accessed Jan 2012 24]..
   Google Scholar
• GrolleR, LongDG. 2000. An annotated check-list of the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Europe and Macaronesia. J Bryol22: 103–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HagedornG, RamboldG, MartellosS. 2010. Types of identification keys. In: NimisPL, Vignes LebbeR, editors. Tools for identifying biodiversity: Progress and problems. pp. 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• HillMO, BellN, Bruggeman-NannengaMA, BruguésM, CanoMJ, EnrothJ, FlatbergKI, FrahmJP, GallegoMT, GarilletiR, GuerraJ, HedenäsL, HolyoakDT, HyvönenJ, IgnatovMS, LaraF, MazimpakaV, MuñozJ, SoderstromL. 2006. An annotated checklist of the mosses of Europe and Macaronesia. J Bryol28: 198–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillyerR, SilmanMR. 2010. Changes in species interactions across a 2.5 km elevation gradient: Effects on plant migration in response to climate change. Glob Change Biol16: 3205–3214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoletschekJ, DrögeG, GüntschA, BerendsohnWG. 2012. The ABCD of primary biodiversity data access. Plant Biosyst146(4): 771–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesCC, AckerSA, HalpernCB. 2010. Combining local- and large-scale models to predict the distributions of invasive plant species. Ecol Appl20: 311–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartellosS. 2010. Multi-authored interactive identification keys: The FRIDA (FRiendly IDentificAtion) package. Taxon59(3): 922–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartellosS. 2012. From a textual checklist to an information system: The case study of ITALIC, the Information System on Italian Lichens. Plant Biosyst146(4): 764–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartellosS, AttorreF. 2012. New trends in biodiversity informatics. Plant Biosyst146(4): 749–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartellosS, AttorreF, De FeliciS, CesaroniD, SbordoniV, BlasiC, NimisPL. 2011. Plant sciences and the Italian National Biodiversity Network. Plant Biosyst145(4): 758–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NascimbeneJ, MartellosS, NimisPL. 2010. An integrated system for producing user-specific keys on demand: An application to Italian lichens. In: NimisPL, Vignes LebbeR, editors. Tools for identifying biodiversity: Progress and problems.Trieste: EUT publisher. pp. 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• NimisPL, MartellosS. 2002. ITALIC, a database on Italian Lichens. Bibliotheca Lichenologica82: 271–282.
   Google Scholar
• NimisPL, RiccamboniR, MartellosS. 2012. Identification keys on mobile devices: The Dryades experience. Plant Biosyst146(4): 783–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NISM. 2004. Online-Atlas of Swiss Bryophytes, Available: http://www.nism.uzh.ch/map/map_en.php [cited Jan 2012 24]..
   Google Scholar
• RosRM, MazimpakaV, Abou-SalamaU, AleffiM, BlockeelTL, BruguésM, CanoMJ, CrosRM, DiaMG, DirkseGM, El SaadawiW, ErdağA, GanevaA, Gonzáles-ManceboJM, HerrnstadtI, KhalilK, KürschnerH, LanfrancoE, Losada-LimaA, RefaiMS, Rodríguez-NuñezS, SabovljeviċM, SérgioC, ShabbaraH, SimM, SöderströmL. 2007. Hepatics and Anthocerotes of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist. Cryptogamie, Bryol28(4): 351–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne. Catalogue of Australian Mosses [Internet], Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne. Available: http://www.rbg.vic.gov.au/dbpages/cat/index.php/mosscatalogue [Accessed Jan 2012 24]..
   Google Scholar
• SchalkP, NimisPL, AddinkW. 2008. KeyToNature species identification e-tools for education. In: WeitzmanA, BelbinLee, editors. Proceedings of TDWG (2008). Freemantle, Australia/St Louis: Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)/Missouri Botanical Garden. pp. 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• ShethAP, LarsonJA. 1990. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Comput Surv22(3): 183–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, Shevock JR. 2001. Bryophytes of Nevada On-Line [Internet], Available: http://www.heritage.nv.gov/mosses/index.htm [Accessed Jan 2012 24]..
   Google Scholar
• Towsend PetersonA, SoberónJ. 2012. Integrating fundamental concepts of ecology, biogeography, and sampling into effective ecological niche modeling and species distribution modelling. Plant Biosyst146(4): 789–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VollmarA, MacklinJA, FordLS. 2010. Natural history specimen digitization: Challenges and concerns. J Biodiversity Informatics7: 93–112.
   Google Scholar