Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. H. Walker: A new record from Pakistan

References

• AdamsCD. 1963. Compositae. In: HepperFN, editor. Flora of West Tropical Africa. 2nd ed., London: Crown Agents. pp. 225–297.
   Google Scholar
• ArsenovicM, ZivanovicM, PekezM. 1988. Results of testing some new herbicides for weed control on railway tracks in Vojvodina. Fragment Herbologica Jugoslavica17(1–2): 133–138.
   Google Scholar
• BackerCA, Bakhuizen van den BrinkRC. 1965. Asteraceae. In:Flora of Java (Spermatophytes only). Vol. 2. Noordhoff, Groningen, Netherlands. pp. 362–437.
   Google Scholar
• BakerJG. 1882. Compositae III. Asteroideae et Inuloideae. In: MartiusCFP, editor. Flora Brasiliensis. Fleischer Lipsiae. Vol. 6, no. 3. pp. 1–134.
   Google Scholar
• BeentjeHJ. 2002. Compositae (Part 2). Flora of Tropical East Africa. Rotterdam: Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• BevanD. 1992. The natural history of Haringey's ancient woodlands. Lond Nat71: 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• BosserJ, GuehoJ, JefereyC. 1993. Flore Des Mascareignes. Composées. The Sugar Industry Research Institute, Mauritius L' Institut Francais De Recherché Scientifique Pour Le Développment En Coopération (Orstom), Paris. Roy Bot Gardens Kew109: 109–110.
   Google Scholar
• CarreteroJL. 1989. The alien weed flora of the Valencian community (Spain). 4th EWRS symposium on weed problems in Mediterranean climates. Problems of weed control in fruit, hortic. Crops Rice2: 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• CaseC, CrawleyM. 2000. Effect of interspecific competition and herbivory on the recruitment of an invasive alien plant. Conyza sumatrensis. Biol Invasions2: 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• ChivasaS, EkpoEJA, HicksRGT. 2002. New hosts of Turnip mosaic virus in Zimbabwe. Plant Path51(3): 386. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00699.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CórdobaMC, Martínez-PriegoL, JordáC. 2004. New natural hosts of Pepino Mosaic Virus in Spain. Plant Dis. 88–90.
   Google Scholar
• CronquistA. 1976. Conyza Linnaeus. In: TutinTG, HeywoodVH, BurgesNA, MooreDM, ValentineDH, WaltersSM, WebbDA, editors. Flora Europaea. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 120 p
   Google Scholar
• CronquistA. 1980. Asteraceae. Vascular flora of the southeastern United States. Vol. 1. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• CuatrecasasJ. 1969. Prima flora Colombiana. Vol. 3. Compositae-Astereae. Webbia24: 1–335.
   Google Scholar
• De CandolleAP. 1836. Compositae. (Compositarum tribus priodes). Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilisVol. 5. Paris: Treuttel & Wurtz.
   Google Scholar
• EscarreJ, DebusscheM, ImbertE, LepartJ, ThebaudC. 1998. Life history traits of three exotic invasive Compositae: Conyza canadensis, Conyza sumatrensis and Crepis sancta. In: MailletJ, editor. Comptes-Rendus 6eme Symposium Mediterraneen EWRS, 13–15 May 1998, Montpellier, France. Montpellier, France: European Weed Research Society. pp. 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• GhafoorA. 2002. Asteraceae-Anthemideae. In: AliSI, QaiserM, editors. Vol. 207, Flora of Pakistan. Pakistan: Jointly published by the University of Karachi and Missouri Botanical Press.
   Google Scholar
• HemsleyWB. 1881. Compositae. In: GodmanED, SalvinO, editors. Contributions to the knowledge of the Fauna and Flora of Mexico and Central America. Botany. Vol. 2. London: Porter. pp. 69–263.
   Google Scholar
• HentyEE, PritchardGH. 1975. Weeds of New Guinea and their control. Lp. Papua New Guinea: Department of Forests, Division of Botany, Lae, 4th ed., Botany Bulletin No. 7.
   Google Scholar
• HolmLG, PanchoJV, HerbergerJP, PlucknettDL. 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• HusseyB, KeigheryG, CousensR, DoddJ, LloydS. 1997. Western weeds: A guide to the weeds of Western Australia. Perth: The Plant Protection Society of Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• ItohK, AzmiM, AhmadA. 1992. Paraquat resistance in Solanum nigrum, Crassocephalum crepidioides, Amaranthus lividus and Conyza sumatrensis in Malaysia. 1st International Weed Control Congress. Melbourne, Australia. Weed Sci Soc Vic2: 224–228.
   Google Scholar
• ItohK, ItoK. 1994. Weed ecology and its control in south-east tropical countries. Jpn J Trop Agric38: 369–373.
   Google Scholar
• JordáC, FontI, MartínezP, JuarezM, OrtegaA, LacasaA. 2001. Current status and new natural hosts of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV) in Spain. Plant Dis85(4): 445–445.
   Google Scholar
• KosterJT. 1966. The compositae of New Guinea I. Nova Guinea Bot24: 497–614.
   Google Scholar
• KostermansAJGH, WirjahardjaS, DekkerRJ. 1987. The weeds: Description, ecology and control. Weeds of rice in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka. pp. 24–565.
   Google Scholar
• LindEM, TallantireAC. 1971. Some flowering plants of Uganda. Nairobi, Kenya: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MichaelPW. 1977. Some weedy species of Amaranthus and Conyza/Erigeron (fleabanes) naturalized in the Asian-Pacific region. 6th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Indonesia. pp. 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• MiquelFAW. 1856. Compositae. Flora van Nederlandsch Indie, Van der Post. Amsterdam2(1): 1–116.
   Google Scholar
• ParhamJW. 1958. The weeds of Fiji. Bulletin Fiji, Department of Agriculture, Suva, FJ: The Government Press. p. 35.
   Google Scholar
• ParkerC. 1992. Weeds of Bhutan. Simtokha, Bhutan: National Plant Protection Centre. 236 p
   Google Scholar
• PersoonCH. 1807. Synopsis plantarum, seu Enchiridium botanicum, complectens enumerationem systematicam specierum hucusque cognitarum. Vol. 2. Paris: Treuttel & Wurtz and Tubingae.
   Google Scholar
• PoiretJLM. 1808. In: LamarckJB, editor. Encyclopedie methodique: Botanique. Vol. 8. Paris: Agasse.
   Google Scholar
• RidleyHN. 1923. The Flora of the Malay Peninsula. Vol. 2. London: L. Reeve & Co., Ltd., pp. 490–495.
   Google Scholar
• RogersRW. 2000. Weeds in the germinable seed populations from the Heron Island National Park, Great Barrier Reef. Roy Soc Qld109: 131–134.
   Google Scholar
• SmithAC. 1991. Flora Vitiensis nova: A new flora of Fiji. Vol. 5. Lawai, Kauai, Hawaii: National Tropical Botanical Garden. p. 626.
   Google Scholar
• SprengelK. 1826. Caroli Linnaei, Systema Vegetabilium. Vol. 3. Gottingen: Librariae Dieterichianae.
   Google Scholar
• StewartRR. 1972. Annotated catalogue of vascular plants of West Pakistan and Kashmir. Karachi, Pakistan: Fakhri Printing Press. pp. 734–735.
   Google Scholar
• ThebaudC, AbbottRJ. 1995. Characterization of invasive Conyza species (Asteraceae) in Europe: quantitative trait and isozyme analysis. Am J Bot82(3): 360–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThebaudC, FinziAC, AffreL, DebusscheM, EscarreJ. 1996. Assessing why two introduced Conyza differ in their ability to invade Mediterranean old fields. Eco Soc Am77(3): 791–804.
   Google Scholar
• USDA-ARS. 2004. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, MD. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/tax_search.plNational Germplasm Resources Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• WellsMJ, BalsinhasAA, JoffeH, EngelbrechtVM, HardingG, StirtonCH. 1986. A catalogue of problem plants in South Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa 53: 1–658.
   Google Scholar
• WildH. 1975. The compositae of the flora Zambesiaca area. Vol. 4. Astereae. Kirkia10(1): 1–72.
   Google Scholar
• WilldenowCL. 1803. Species plantarum. Edition Quarta. Vol. 3, no. 3. Berlin. p. 585.
   Google Scholar
• WurzellB. 1988. Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E Walker. Established in England. Watsonia17: 145–148.
   Google Scholar