Phylogenenetic approach of the section Bulbocodii D.C. of Narcissus based on cpDNA. A case of taxonomic inflation?

References

• AedoC. 2013. Narcissus L. In: CastroviejoS, AedoC, LaínzM, Muñoz GarmendiaF, Nieto FelinerG, PaivaJ, BenedíC, editors. Flora iberica. Vol. 20. Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. pp. 340–397.
   Google Scholar
• BarraA. 2003. Notas sobre el género Narcissus L. (Amarylidaceae) (III). Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)60(1): 222–224.
   Google Scholar
• BarraA, López GonzálezG. 1982. Notas sueltas sobre el género Narcissus en España. Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)39: 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• BarraA, López GonzálezG. 1983. Novedades en el género Narcissus L. (Amaryllidaceae). Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)39(2): 297–299.
   Google Scholar
• BarraA, López GonzálezG. 1984. Datos cariológicos sobre el género Narcissus L. Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)40(2): 369–377.
   Google Scholar
• BarraA, López GonzálezG. 1986. Diferencias entre Narcissus cantabricus DC. subsp luteolentus y Narcissus hedraeanthus (Webb & Heldr.) Colmeiro. Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)43(1): 186–187.
   Google Scholar
• BarraA, López GonzálezG. 1992. Notas Sobre el género Narcissus L. (III). Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)50(1): 123.
   Google Scholar
• BlanchardJW. 1990. Narcissus: A guide to wild daffodils. Surrey: Alpine Garden Society.
   Google Scholar
• BobadillaJF, GuerreroMJ, AguileraJG, PeraltaMF. 1981. Notas sobre la cariología del género Narcissus L. Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)38(1): 145–148.
   Google Scholar
• BradburyJH, HollowayWD. 1988. Chemistry of tropical root crops: Significance for nutrition and agriculture in the Pacific. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Inkata Press Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• ChristensenKI. 1987. Taxonomic revision of the Pinus mugo complex and P. rhaetica (P. mugo sylvestris) (Pinaceae). Nord J Bot7(4): 383–408. 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1987.tb00958.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClementM, PosadaD, CrandallKA. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol9(10): 1657–1659. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa JimenezMA, Fernández LópezC. 1985. Mapas corologicos en la provincia de Jaen: Liliaceae a Iridaceae. Blancoana3: 14–34.
   Google Scholar
• FelsensteinJ. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution39(4): 783–791. 10.2307/2408678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FernandesA. 1959. On the origin of Narcissus romieuxii Br.-BI. & Mair. Bol Soc Brot (Série 2)33: 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• FernandesA. 1968. Keys to the identification of native and naturalized taxa of the genus Narcissus L. In: Royal Horticultural Society, editor. Daffodil and Tulip Yearbook. London: Royal Horticultural Society. pp. 37–66.
   Google Scholar
• FernandesA. 1975. L'evolution chez le genre Narcissus L. Anal Inst Bot Cavanilles32(2): 843–872.
   Google Scholar
• FernandesA. 1987. Sur le rôle de la triploidie dans l'évolution chez la section Bulbocodii DC. du Genre Narcissus L. Bol Soc Brot (Série 2)60: 273–322.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández CasasJ. 1984. Remiendos y enmiendas en el género Narcissus L. Fontqueria6: 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández CasasJ. 1986. Quatro novidades em Narcissus L. Fontqueria10: 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández CasasJ. 2005. Narcissorum noctulae, VI. Fontqueria55(34): 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• FrancoJA, AfonsoMR. 1994. Nova Flora de Portugal (continente e Açores). Vol III. Fasc. I. Lisboa: Escolar Editora.
   Google Scholar
• GrahamSW, BarrettSH. 2004. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Am J Bot91(7): 1007–1021. 10.3732/ajb.91.7.1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuindonS, GascuelO. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol52(5): 696–704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallTA. 1999. BioEdit (v. 7.0.1): A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxford)41: 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• HamiltonCW, ReichardSH. 1992. Current practice in the use of subspecies, variety, and forma in the classification of wild plants. Taxon41(3): 485–498. 10.2307/1222819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HedenäsL. 2009. Relationships among arctic and non-arctic haplotypes of the moss species Scorpidium cossonii and Scorpidium scorpioides (calliergonaceae). Plant Syst Evol277(3–4): 217–231. 10.1007/s00606-008-0131-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonLA, SoltisDE. 1995. Matk DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. str. Syst Bot75: 753–766.
   Google Scholar
• KocyanA, QiuYL, EndressPK, ContiE. 2004. A phylogenetic analysis of Apostasioideae (Orchidaceae) based on ITS, trnL-F and matK sequences. Plant Syst Evol247(3–4): 203–213. 10.1007/s00606-004-0133-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PalermoAM, De VitaA, PeruzziL, GarganoD, BernardoL, MusacchioA. 2010. Does Plantago brutia Ten. (Plantaginaceae) merit specific rank? Insights from nrDNA and cpDNA data. Plant Biosyst144(3): 573–581. 10.1080/11263501003672496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PosadaD. 2008. JModeltest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol25(7): 1253–1256, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PosadaD, CrandallKA. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: Trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol Evol16(1): 37–45. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02026-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiesebergLH, SoltisDE. 1991. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol Trends Plants5: 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas PonceMA, SorianoC, Fernández-CasasJ. 1985. Ocho narcisos en una localidade de Colmenar Viejo. Anales Jard Bot (Madrid)42(1): 125–132.
   Google Scholar
• RonquistF, HuelsenbeckJP. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics19(12): 1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-GallyR, VargasP, ArroyoJ. 2012. Insights into Neogene Mediterranean biogeography based on phylogenetic relationships of mountain and lowland lineages of Narcissus (amaryllidaceae). J Biogeogr39(4): 782–798. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02526.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StamatakisA, HooverP, RougemontP. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol57(5): 758–771. 10.1080/10635150802429642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwoffordDL. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Version 4 beta 10.
   Google Scholar
• TaberletP, GiellyL, PautouG, BouvetJ. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol17(5): 1105–1109. 10.1007/BF00037152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThompsonJD, Gibson TJ, PlewniakF, JeanmouginF, Higgins DG. 1997. The Clustal_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res25(24): 4876–4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZonneveldBM. 2008. The systematic value of nuclear DNA content for all species of Narcissus L. (Amaryllidaceae). Plant Syst Evol275(1–2): 109–132. 10.1007/s00606-008-0015-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar