Growth and physiological response of Arundo donax L. to controlled drought stress and recovery

References

• Aguiar FCF, Ferreira MT. 2013. Plant invasions in the rivers of the Iberian Peninsula, south-western Europe: A review. Plant Biosyst 147: 1107–1119.10.1080/11263504.2013.861539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker JT, Mahan JR, Gitz DC, Lascano RJ, Ephrath JE. 2012. Comparison of deficit irrigation scheduling methods that use canopy temperature measurements. Plant Biosyst 147: 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta NT, Tabatabai MA. 1985. Determination of total potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium in plant materials by ion chromatography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49: 76–81.10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900010015x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell GP. 1997. Ecology and management of Arundo donax, and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in Southern California. In: Brock JH, Wade M, Pysek P, Green D, editors. Plant invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands: Blackhuys Publishers. pp. 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG. 1995. Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7: 1099–1111.10.1105/tpc.7.7.1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrow RN. 1996. Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast: Root-shoot responses. Crop Sci 36: 687–694.10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030028x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesti-Grapow L, Capotorti G, Del Vico E, Lattanzi E, Tilia A, Blasi C. 2013. The vascular flora of Rome. Plant Biosyst 147: 1059–1087.10.1080/11263504.2013.862315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai Q, Jin F, Merewitz E, Huang B. 2010. Growth and physiological traits associated with drought survival and post-drought recovery in perennial turfgrass species. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 135: 125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha-um S, Wangmoon S, Mongkolsiriwatana C, Ashraf M, Kirdmanee C. 2012. Evaluating sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) cultivars for water deficit tolerance using some key physiological markers. Plant Biotechnol 29: 431–439.10.5511/plantbiotechnology.12.0726a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osóirio ML, et al. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot-London 89: 907–916.10.1093/aob/mcf105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christou M, Mardikis M, Alexopoulou E, Kyritsis S, Cosentino SL, Vecchiet M, et al. 2002. Arundo donax productivity in the EU. Results from the giant reed (Arundo donax L.) network (1997–2001). Proceedings of the 12th European Conference and Technology exhibition on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection. pp. 127–130, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Coffman GC. 2007. Factors influencing invasion of giant reed (Arundo donax) in riparian ecosystems of Mediterranean-type climate regions. Los Angeles: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Cornic G, Fresneau C. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon reduction and carbon oxidation cycles are the main electron sinks for photosystem II activity during a mild drought. Ann Bot-London 89: 887–894.10.1093/aob/mcf064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosentino SL, Patanè C, Sanzone E, Copani V, Foti S. 2007. Effects of soil water content and nitrogen supply on the productivity of Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu. in a Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 25: 75–88.10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotrozzi L, Remorini D, Pellegrini E, Landi M, Massai R, Nali C, et al. 2016. Variations in physiological and biochemical traits of oak seedlings grown under drought and ozone stress. Physiol Plantarum 157: 69–84.10.1111/ppl.2016.157.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danin A. 2004. Arundo (Gramineae) in the Mediterranean reconsidered. Willdenowia 34: 361–369.10.3372/wi.34.34204
   Google Scholar
• de Mendiburu F. 2012. Agricolae: Statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.1-4. p. 60. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae.
   Google Scholar
• Dreuw A, Fleming GR, Head-Gordon M. 2005. Role of electron-transfer quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence by carotenoids in non-photochemical quenching of green plants. Biochem Soc Trans 33: 858–862.10.1042/BST0330858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghannoum O. 2009. C4 photosynthesis and water stress. Ann Bot-London 103: 635–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardion L, Verlaque R, Saltonstall K, Leriche A, Vila B. 2014. Origin of the invasive Arundo donax (Poaceae): A trans-Asian expedition in herbaria. Ann Bot-London 114: 455–462.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Wang Z, Huang B. 2012. Growth and physiological recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from drought stress as affected by a synthetic cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine. Crop Sci 52: 2332–2340.10.2135/cropsci2012.02.0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal N, Umar S, Khan NA, Khan MIR. 2014. A new perspective of phytohormones in salinity tolerance: Regulation of proline metabolism. Environ Exp Bot 100: 34–42.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Yao Y, Wang Y. 2012. Physiological response, cell wall components, and gene expression of switchgrass under short-term drought stress and recovery. Crop Sci 52: 2718–2727.10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karcher DE, Richardson MD, Hignight K, Rush D. 2008. Drought tolerance of tall fescue populations selected for high root/shoot ratios and summer survival. Crop Sci 48: 771–777.10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Christou M. 2003. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenerg 25: 335–361.10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00030-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantineo M, D’Agosta GM, Copani V, Patanè C, Cosentino SL. 2009. Biomass yield and energy balance of three perennial crops for energy use in the semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crop Res 114: 204–213.10.1016/j.fcr.2009.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza N, Mahmood Q, Pervez A, Ahmad R, Farooq R, Shah MM, et al. 2010. Phytoremediation potential of Arundo donax in arsenic-contaminated synthetic wastewater. Bioresour Technol 101: 5815–5819.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti A, Zatta A. 2009. Root distribution and soil moisture retrieval in perennial and annual energy crops in Northern Italy. Agr Ecosyst Environ 132: 252–259.10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgana B, Sardo V. 1995. Giant reed and C4 grasses as a source of biomass. In: Chartier P, Beenackers AACM, Grassi G, editors. Biomass for energy, environment, agriculture and industry. Proceedings of the 8th European Biomass Conference. Vienna, Austria: Pergamon Press. pp. 700–707.
   Google Scholar
• Nackley LL, Vogt KA, Kim S-H. 2014. Arundo donax water use and photosynthetic responses to drought and elevated CO2. Agr Water Manage 136: 13–22.10.1016/j.agwat.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navacchi O, Giampaoli A, Zuccherelli G. 2008. La micropropagazione della canna comune (Arundo donax L.) per realizzare impianti da produzione di biomassa [The micropropagation of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) to achieve the production of biomass plants]. La micropropagazione in Italia: stato attuale e prospettive future. Legnaro (PD – Italy).
   Google Scholar
• Norris IB, Thomas H. 1982. The effects of cutting on regrowth of perennial ryegrass selections exposed to drought conditions. J Agr Sci 99: 547–553.10.1017/S0021859600031221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K, Tran L-SP. 2014. Response of plants to water stress. Front Plant Sci 5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdue R. 1958. Arundo donax: Source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ Bot 12: 368–404.10.1007/BF02860024
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RDC. 2012. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-108.
   Google Scholar
• Pompeiano A, Guglielminetti L, Bargiacchi E, Miele S. 2013. Responses in chemical traits and biomass allocation of Arundo donax L. to deficit resources in the establishment year. Chil J Agric Res 73: 377–384.10.4067/S0718-58392013000400008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompeiano A, Landi M, Meloni G, Vita F, Guglielminetti L, Guidi L. 2016. Allocation pattern, ion partitioning, and chlorophyll a fluorescence in Arundo donax L. in responses to salinity stress. Plant Biosyst 1–10.10.1080/11263504.2016.1187680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompeiano A, Vita F, Alpi A, Guglielminetti L. 2015a. Arundo donax L. response to low oxygen stress. Environ Exp Bot 111: 147–154.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompeiano A, Vita F, Miele S, Guglielminetti L. 2015b. Freeze tolerance and physiological changes during cold acclimation of giant reed [Arundo donax (L.)]. Grass Forage Sci 70: 168–175.10.1111/gfs.2015.70.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Fry JD. 1997. Water relations and drought tolerance of four turfgrasses. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122: 129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rabhi M, Castagna A, Remorini D, Scattino C, Smaoui A, Ranieri A, et al. 2012. Photosynthetic responses to salinity in two obligate halophytes: Sesuvium portulacastrum and Tecticornia indica. S Afr J Bot 79: 39–47.10.1016/j.sajb.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossa B, Tüffers AV, Naidoo G, von Willert DJ. 1998. Arundo donax L. (Poaceae) – A C3 species with unusually high photosynthetic capacity. Bot Acta 111: 216–221.10.1111/plb.1998.111.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Santín-Montanyá MI, Jimenéz J, Vilán XM, Ocaña L. 2014. Effects of size and moisture of rhizome on initial invasiveness ability of giant reed. J Environ Sci Health B 49: 41–44.10.1080/03601234.2013.836881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholander PF, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA, Hammel HT. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants. Science 148: 339–346.10.1126/science.148.3668.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma KP, Kushwaha SPS, Gopal B. 1998. A comparative study of stand structure and standing crops of two wetland species, Arundo donax and Phragmites karka, and primary production in Arundo donax with observations on the effect of clipping. Trop Ecol 39: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shen H, Du H, Wang Z, Huang B. 2009. Differential responses of nutrients to heat stress in warm-season and cool-season turfgrasses. HortScience 44: 2009–2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer DF, Ksander GG, Whitehand LC. 2005. Spatial and temporal variation in RGR and leaf quality of a clonal riparian plant: Arundo donax. Aquat Bot 81: 27–36.10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa R, Di Trapani AM, Foderà M, Sgroi F, Tudisca S. 2014. Economic evaluation of introduction of poplar as biomass crop in Italy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38: 775–780.10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas RL, Sheard RW, Moyer JR. 1967. Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron J 59: 240–243.10.2134/agronj1967.00021962005900030010x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner N. 1981. Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant Soil 58: 339–366.10.1007/BF02180062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar