Relationship between herkogamy, incompatibility and reciprocity with pollen–ovule ratios in Melochia (Malvaceae)

References

• Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85: 2408–2421.10.1890/03-8024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baena-Díaz F, Fornoni J, Sosenski P, Molina-Freaner FE, Weller SG, Pérez-Ishiwara R, Domínguez CA. 2012. Changes in reciprocal herkogamy during the tristyly–distyly transition in Oxalis alpina increase efficiency in pollen transfer. J Evol Biol 25: 574–583.10.1111/jeb.2012.25.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker HG. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after “long-distance” dispersal. Evolution 9: 347–348.10.2307/2405656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker HG. 1967. Support for Baker’s law-as a rule. Evolution 21: 853–856.10.2307/2406780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker AM, Barrett SCH, Thompson JD. 2000. Variation of pollen limitation in the early flowering Mediterranean geophyte Narcissus assoanus (Amaryllidaceae). Oecologia 124: 529–535.10.1007/s004420000417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett SCH. 1992. Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: Model systems for evolutionary analysis. In: Barrett SCH, editor. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 1–29.10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2
   Google Scholar
• Barrett SCH, Harder LD. 2005. The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus). New Phytol 165: 45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borhidi A. 1991. Phytogeography and vegetation ecology of Cuba. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiado.
   Google Scholar
• Brys R, Jacquemyn H. 2015. Disruption of the distylous syndrome in Primula veris. Ann Bot-London 115: 27–39.10.1093/aob/mcu211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brys R, Jacquemyn H, Hermy M, Beeckman T. 2008. Pollen deposition rates and the functioning of distyly in the perennial Pulmonaria officinalis (Boraginaceae). Plant Syst Evol 273: 1–12.10.1007/s00606-008-0003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro S, Ferrero V, Costa J, Sousa AJ, Castro M, Navarro L, et al. 2013. Reproductive strategy of the invasive Oxalis pes-caprae: Distribution patterns of floral morphs, ploidy levels and sexual reproduction. Biol Invasions 15: 1863–1875.10.1007/s10530-013-0414-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro S, Silveira P, Navarro L. 2008. How flower biology and breeding system affect the reproductive success of the narrow endemic Polygala vayredae Costa (Polygalaceae)? Bot J Linn Soc 157: 67–81.10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesaro AC, Barrett SCH, Maurice S, Vaissiere BE, Thompson JD. 2004. An experimental evaluation of self-interference in Narcissus assoanus: Functional and evolutionary implications. J Evol Biol 17: 1367–1376.10.1111/jeb.2004.17.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnov EL. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci-Biol 76: 2480–2484.10.1073/pnas.76.5.2480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnov EL. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheptou PO. 2012. Clarifying Baker’s law. Ann Bot-London 109: 633–641.10.1093/aob/mcr127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouteau M, Barabé D, Gibernau M. 2006. A comparative study of inflorescence characters and pollen-ovule ratios among the genera Philodendron and Anthurium (Araceae). Int J Plant Sci 167: 817–829.10.1086/504925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consolaro H, Silva SCS, Oliveira PE. 2011. Breakdown of distyly and pin-monomorphism in Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae). Plant Spec Biol 26: 24–32.10.1111/psb.2011.26.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa J, Ferrero V, Loureiro J, Castro M, Navarro L, Castro S. 2014. Sexual reproduction of the pentaploid short-styled Oxalis pes-caprae allows the production of viable offspring. Plant Biol 16: 208–214.10.1111/plb.12010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruden RW. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: A conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32–46.10.2307/2407542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London: John Murray.10.5962/bhl.title.46988
   Google Scholar
• Dorr LJ, Barnett LC. 1989. A revision of Melochia section Physodium (Sterculiaceae) from Mexico. Brittonia 41: 404–423.10.2307/2807556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euler TV, Ågren J, Ehrlén J. 2012. Floral display and habitat quality affect cost of reproduction in Primula farinosa. Oikos 121: 1400–1407.10.1111/more.2012.121.issue-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faife-Cabrera M, Ferrero V, Navarro L. 2014. Unravelling the stylar polymorphism in Melochia species (Malvaceae): Reciprocity and ancillary characters. Bot J Linn Soc 176: 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria R, Ferrero V, Navarro L, Araujo AC. 2012. Flexible mating system in distylous populations of Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae) in Brazilian Cerrado. Plant Syst Evol 298: 619–627.10.1007/s00606-011-0571-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero V, Arroyo J, Castro S, Navarro L. 2012. Unusual heterostyly: Style dimorphism and self-incompatibility are not tightly associated in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Ann Bot 109: 655–665.10.1093/aob/mcr222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero V, Castro S, Sánchez JM, Navarro L. 2011a. Stigma-anther reciprocity, pollinators, and pollen transfer efficiency in populations of heterostylous species of Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant Syst Evol 291: 267–276.10.1007/s00606-010-0387-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero V, Chapela I, Arroyo J, Navarro L. 2011b. Reciprocal style polymorphisms are not easily categorized: The case of heterostyly in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant Biol 13: 7–18.10.1111/plb.2010.13.issue-s1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg A. 1967. The genus Melochia L. (Sterculiaceae). Contrib US Nat Herb 34: 191–363.
   Google Scholar
• Gong YB, Huang SQ. 2014. Interspecific variation in pollen-ovule ratio is negatively correlated with pollen transfer efficiency in a natural community. Plant Biol 16: 843–847.10.1111/plb.2014.16.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götzenberger L, Durka W, Kühn I, Klotz S. 2006. The relationship of pollen-ovule ratio and seed size: A comparative test of a sex allocation hypothesis. Evol Ecol Res 8: 1101–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götzenberger L, Kühn I, Klotz S. 2008. Effects of habitat disturbance and pollination type on the interspecific variation in pollen-ovule ratios. Preslia 80: 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgins KA, Barrett SCH. 2008. Geographic variation in floral morphology and style-morph ratios in a sexually polymorphic daffodil. Am J Bot 95: 185–195.10.3732/ajb.95.2.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. 2010. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Version 19.0. North Castle, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Jules ES, Rathcke BJ. 1999. Mechanisms of reduced trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest fragments. Conserv Biol 13: 784–793.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 2002. Pollen grain numbers, ovule numbers and pollen-ovule ratios in Caryophylloideae: Correlation with breeding system, pollination, life form, style number, and sexual system. Sex Plant Reprod 14: 279–289.
   Google Scholar
• Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, et al. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Pattern and process. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36: 467–497.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.115320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson BMH, Barrett SCH. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol J Linn Soc 69: 503–520.10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01221.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int J Plant Sci 153: 358–369.10.1086/297040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, editor. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 151–178.10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH, editor. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 179–207.
   Google Scholar
• Martin FW. 1967. Distyly, self-incompatibility, and evolution in Melochia. Evolution 21: 493–499.10.2307/2406610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mast AR, Kelso S, Conti E. 2006. Are any primroses (Primula) primitively monomorphic? New Phytol 171: 605–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mione T, Anderson GJ. 1992. Pollen-ovule ratios and breeding system evolution in Solanum section Basarthrum (Solanaceae). Am J Bot 79: 279–287.10.2307/2445016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal PR, Anderson GJ. 2005. Are “mating systems” “breeding systems” of inconsistent and confusing terminology in plant reproductive biology? Or is it the other way around? Plant Syst Evol 250: 173–185.10.1007/s00606-004-0229-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2004. Convergent evolution of flower polymorphism in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). New Phytol 161: 235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J. 2010. Pollinator shifts and the loss of style polymorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). J Evol Biol 23: 1117–1128.10.1111/jeb.2010.23.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Barrales R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2006. New evidence for the Darwinian hypothesis of heterostyly: Breeding systems and pollinators in Narcissus sect. Apodanthi. New Phytol 171: 553–567.10.1111/nph.2006.171.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queller DC. 1984. Pollen-ovule ratios and hermaphrodite sexual allocation strategies. Evolution 38: 1148–1151.10.2307/2408447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806384
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez N, Navarro L. 2010. Trends in the reproductive biology of Venezuelan Melochia (Malvaceae) species. Plant Syst Evol 289: 147–163.10.1007/s00606-010-0340-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea AC, Nasrallah JB. 2008. Self-incompatibility systems: Barriers to self-fertilization in flowering plants. Int J Develop Biol 52: 627–636.10.1387/ijdb.072537ar
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards J. 2003. Primula. 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez A. 2000. Sterculiaceae. Flora de la República de Cuba, Fascículo 3(4) Serie A, Plantas Vasculares [Sterculiaceae. The Flora of the Cuban Republic, vol 3(4) Series A, Vascular plants]. Konigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez JM, Ferrero V, Arroyo J, Navarro L. 2010. Patterns of style polymorphism in five species of the South African genus Nivenia (Iridaceae). Ann Bot 106: 321–331.10.1093/aob/mcq111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez JM, Ferrero V, Navarro L. 2008. A new approach to the quantification of degree of reciprocity in distylous (sensu lato) plant populations. Ann Bot-London 102: 463–472.10.1093/aob/mcn111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez JM, Ferrero V, Navarro L. 2013. Quantifying reciprocity in distylous and tristylous plant populations. Plant Biol 15: 616–620.10.1111/plb.2013.15.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Gally R, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Arroyo J. 2013. Deconstructing heterostyly: The evolutionary role of incompatibility system, pollinators, and floral architecture. Evolution 67: 2072–2082.10.1111/evo.12087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlindwein C, Medeiros PCR. 2006. Pollination in Turnera subulata (Turneraceae): Unilateral reproductive dependence of the narrowly oligolectic bee Protomeliturga turnerae (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae). Flora 201: 178–188.10.1016/j.flora.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen DJ, Johnston MO, L’Heureux AM, Marsolais JV. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51: 1090–1099.10.2307/2411038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simón-Porcar V, de Castro A, Herrero M, Arroyo J. 2015. Ovarian self-incompatibility in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae) is the result of a pre-zygotic response. Bot J Linn Soc 177: 629–643.10.1111/boj.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler DW, Kalisz S. 2001. Sex among the flowers: The distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55: 202–204.10.1111/evo.2001.55.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos JM, Wüest RO, Conti E. 2014. Small and ugly? Phylogenetic analyses of the “selfing syndrome” reveal complex evolutionary fates of monomorphic primrose flowers. Evolution 68: 1042–1057.10.1111/evo.2014.68.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb CJ, Lloyd DG. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms II. Herkogamy. New Zeal J Bot 24: 163–178.10.1080/0028825X.1986.10409726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar