Karyotypes, heterochromatin distribution and rDNA patterns in South American Grindelia (Asteraceae)

References

• Baeza C, Schrader O. 2005. Comparative karyotype analysis in Haplopappus Cass. and Grindelia Willd. (Asteraceae) by double FISH with rRNA specific genes. Plant Syst Evol 251: 161–172.10.1007/s00606-004-0231-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli A, Roitman GG, Frayssinet N. 1990. Estudio comparativo de poblaciones diploides y tetraploides de Grindelia chiloensis (Asteraceae) [Comparative study of diploid and tetraploid populations of Grindelia chiloensis (Asteraceae)]. Darwiniana 30: 171–177.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli A, Roitman GG, Frayssinet N. 1993. Presencia de hexaploides (2n = 36) en Grindelia chiloensis (Asteraceae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 29: 139–142.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli A, Tortosa RD. 1994. Tres nuevas especies de Grindelia (Asteraceae), afines a G. chiloensis (Corn.) Cabr [Three new species of Grindelia (Asteraceae), akin to G. chiloensis (Corn.) Cabr]. Kurtziana 23: 131–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli A, Tortosa RD. 1998a. Estudios cromosómicos en especies sudamericanas de Grindelia (Astereae, Asteraceae) [Chromosomic studies in South American species of Grindelia (Astereae, Asteraceae)]. Kurtziana 26: 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli A, Tortosa RD. 1998b. Intermediacy between Grindelia chiloensis and Haplopappus pectinatus (Asteraceae). Taxon 47: 337–345.10.2307/1223763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli A, Tortosa RD. 2012. Revision of the North American species of Grindelia (Asteraceae) 1 Ann Missouri Bot Gard 98: 447–513.10.3417/2008125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli A, Tortosa RD. 2014. Grindelia. In: Anton AM, Zuloaga F, editors. Flora Argentina Vol 7 Tomo 1. San Isidro: Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. pp. 163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Brown GK, Clark WD. 1981. Chromosome numbers in South American Haplopappus Cass. (Compositae). Amer J Bot 68: 1218–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Alsos IG, Borgen L, Grundt HH, Scheen AC, et al. 2004. Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82: 521–536.10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacon J, Sousa A, Baeza CM, Renner SS. 2012. Ribosomal DNA distribution and a genus-wide phylogeny reveal patterns of chromosomal evolution in Alstroemeria (Alstroemeriaceae). Amer J Bot 99: 1501–1512.10.3732/ajb.1200104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covas G, Schnack B. 1946. Número de cromosomas en Antófitas de la región de Cuyo (República Argentina). Revista Argent Agron 13: 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Di Fulvio TE. 1977. Recuentos cromosómicos en Angiospermas Argentinas III [Chromosomic counts in Argentinian Angiosperms III]. Kurtziana 10: 249.
   Google Scholar
• Dunford MP. 1986. Chromosome relationships of diploid species of Grindelia (Compositae) from Colorado, New Mexico, and adjacent areas Amer J Bot 73: 297–303.10.2307/2444184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enke N, Gemeinholzer B. 2008. Babcock revisited: new insights into generic delimitation and character evolution in Crepis L. (Compositae: Cichorieae) from ITS and matK sequence data. Taxon 57: 756–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Robinson H. 2009. Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy.
   Google Scholar
• Galasso I, Sublimi Saponetti L, Pignone D. 1997. Cytotaxonomic studies in Vigna: 3. Chromosomal distribution and reacting properties of the heterochromatin in five wild species of the section Vigna. Caryologia 49: 311–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JL. 1979. Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucl Acids Res 7: 1869–1885.10.1093/nar/7.7.1869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P, Johnson DE. 2015. Index to plant chromosome numbers. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Grau J. 1976. Chromosomenzahlen von sussamerikanischen Haplopappus Arten. Mitteil Bot Staats München 12: 403–410.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra M. 2000. Patterns of heterochromatin distribution in plant chromosomes. Genet Molec Biol 23: 1029–1041.10.1590/S1415-47572000000400049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasterok R, Wolny E, Hosiawa M, Kowalczyk M, Kulak-Ksiazczyk S, Ksiazczyk T. 2006. Comparative analysis of rDNA distribution in chromosomes of various species of Brassicaceae. Ann Bot 97: 205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunziker JH, Escobar A, Xifreda CC, Gamerro JC. 1990. Estudios cariológicos en Compositae VI [Karyologic studies in Compositae VI]. Darwiniana 30: 115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hunziker JH, Wulff A, Xifreda CC, Escobar A. 1989. Estudios cariológicos en Compositae V [Karyologic studies in Compositae V]. Darwiniana 29: 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jones AG. 1985. Chromosomal features as generic criteria in the Astereae. Taxon 34: 44–54.10.2307/1221563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong J. 1997. Laboratory manual of plant cytological. Edinburgh: Royal Botanical Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Lane MA, Li J. 1993. Documented chromosome numbers 1993: 1. Chromosome number reports in Compositae with emphasis on Tribe Astereae of the Southwestern United States and Mexico. SIDA 15: 539–546.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2004. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82: 651–663.10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AJ, Bartoli A, Tortosa RD, Baldwin BG. 2012. Phylogeny, biogeography, and chromosome evolution of the amphitropical genus Grindelia (Asteraceae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast sequence data. Taxon 61: 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno NC, Stiefkens L, Las Peñas ML, Bartoli A, Tortosa R, Bernardello G. 2012. Molecular cytogenetic studies of the “Xanthocephalum group” (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 298: 1503–1514.10.1007/s00606-012-0653-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DR. 2003. nrDNA external transcribed spacer (ETS) sequence data, reticulate evolution, and the systematics of Machaeranthera (Asteraceae). Syst Bot 28: 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DR, Korn RL, Mugleston SL. 2009. Insights into reticulate evolution in Machaerantherinae (Asteraceae: Astereae). 5S ribosomal RNA spacer variation, estimating support for incongruence, and constructing reticulate phylogenies. Amer J Bot 96: 920–932.10.3732/ajb.0800308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscone EA, Lambrou M, Ehrendorfer F. 1996. Fluorescent chromosome banding in the cultivated species of Capsicum (Solanaceae). Plant Syst Evol 202: 37–63.10.1007/BF00985817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesom GL. 1994. Subtribal classification of the Astereae (Asteraceae). Phytologia 76: 193–274.
   Google Scholar
• Nesom GL. 2000. New subtribes for North American Astereae (Asteraceae). SIDA 19: 263–268.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Eroglu H. 2013. Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comp Cytogenet 7: 1–9.10.3897/compcytogen.v7i1.4431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahn K. 1960. Chromosome numbers in some South American angiosperms. Bot Tidssk 56: 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Raskina O, Barber JC, Nevo E, Belyayev A. 2008. Repetitive DNA and chromosomal rearrangements: speciation-related events in plant genomes. Cytog Genome Res 120: 351–357.10.1159/000121084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roa F, Guerra M. 2012. Distribution of 45S rDNA sites in chromosomes of plants: Structural and evolutionary implications. BMC Evol Biol 12: 225.10.1186/1471-2148-12-225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell A, Safer S, Weiss‐Schneeweiss H, Temsch E, Stuppner H, Stuessy TF, et al. 2013. Chromosome counts and genome size of Leontopodium species (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) from South‐western China. Bot J Linn Soc 171: 627–636.10.1111/boj.2013.171.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell A, Samuel R, Klejna V, Barfuss MH, Rupp B, Chase MW. 2010. Reticulate evolution in diploid and tetraploid species of Polystachya (Orchidaceae) as shown by plastid DNA sequences and low-copy nuclear genes. Ann Bot 106: 37–56.10.1093/aob/mcq092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzacher T, Ambros P, Schweizer D. 1980. Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Plant Syst Evol 134: 293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison P. 2000. Practical in situ hybridization. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer D. 1976. Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58: 307–324.10.1007/BF00292840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer D, Ambros P. 1994. Chromosome banding. In: Gosden JR, editor. Methods in molecular biology. Totowa: Humana Press. pp. 97–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Semple JC, Chmielewski JG, Lane M. 1989. Chromosome number determinations in fam. Compositae, tribe Astereae. III. Additional counts and comments on generic limits and ancestral base numbers Rhodora. 91: 296–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semple JC, Chmielewski JG, Xiang C. 1992. Chromosome number determinations in fam. Compositae, tribe Astereae. IV. Additional reports and comments on the cytogeography and status of some species of Aster and Solidago. Rhodora 94: 48–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semple JC, Watanabe K. 2009. A review of chromosome numbers in Asteraceae with hypotheses on chromosomal base number evolution. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, editors. Systematics, evolution, and biography of Compositae. Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. pp. 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Schnack B, Covas G. 1947. Estudios cariológicos en Antófitas [Karyologic studies in Anthophytes]. Haumania 1: 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Solbrig OT, Anderson LC, Kyhos DW, Raven PH, Rudenberg L. 1964. Chromosome numbers in compositae V. Astereae II. Am J Bot 51: 513–519.10.2307/2440279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbrig OT, Anderson LC, Kyhos DW, Raven PH. 1969. Chromosome numbers in compositae VII: Astereae III Am J Bot 56: 348–353.10.2307/2440859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayalé A, Parisod C. 2013. Natural pathways to polyploidy in plants and consequences for genome reorganization Cytog Genome Res 140: 79–96.10.1159/000351318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrell M, Cerbah M, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Valles J. 2003. Molecular cytogenetics of the genus Artemisia (Asteraceae, Anthemideae): fluorochrome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization.I. Subgenus Seriphidium and related taxa. Plant Syst Evol 239: 141–153.10.1007/s00606-002-0259-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BL, Bacon J, Urbatsch L, Simpson B. 1979. Chromosome numbers in South American Compositae Am J Bot 66: 173–178.10.2307/2442521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe K. 2015. Index to chromosome numbers in Asteraceae. Kobe: Kobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss H, Stuessy TF, Grau J, Baeza CM. 2003. Chromosome reports from South American Hypochaeris (Asteraceae) Ann Missouri Bot Gard 90: 56–63.10.2307/3298525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Stuessy TF, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Baeza CM, Parker J. 2003. Karyotype evolution in South American species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Plant Syst Evol 241: 171–184.10.1007/s00606-003-0026-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Schneeweiss GM. 2013. Karyotype diversity and evolutionary trends in angiosperms. In: Greilhuber J, Dolezel J, Wendel JF, editors. Plant Genome Diversity Vol 2. Vienna: Springer. pp. 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker T, Steyermark J. 1935. Cytological aspects of Grindelia Species Bull Torrey Bot Club 62: 69–73.10.2307/2480868
   Google Scholar
• Wulff AF, Hunziker JH, Escobar A. 1996. Estudios cariológicos en Compositae. VII. Darwiniana 34: 213–231.
   Google Scholar