359
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Genetic diversity in a collection of Italian long storage tomato landraces as revealed by SNP markers array

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 288-297 | Received 08 Dec 2017, Accepted 15 May 2018, Published online: 05 Jun 2018

References

  • Andreakis N, Giordano I, Pentangelo A, Fogliano V, Graziani G, Monti LM, Rao R. 2004. DNA fingerprinting and quality traits of Corbarino cherry-like tomato landraces. J Agric Food Chem. 52(11):3366–3371.10.1021/jf049963y
  • Bauchet G, Causse M. 2012. Genetic diversity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and its wild relatives. In: Caliskan M, editor. Genetic diversity in plants. Rijeka, Croatia: InTechOpen; pp. 33–162.
  • Blanca J, Cañizares J, Cordero L, Pascual L, Diez MJ, Nuez F. 2012. Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE. 7(10):e48198.10.1371/journal.pone.0048198
  • Casals J, Pascual L, Cañizares J, Cebolla-Cornejo J, Casañas F, Nuez F. 2012. Genetic basis of long shelf life and variability into Penjar tomato. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 59(2):219–229.10.1007/s10722-011-9677-6
  • Causse M, Desplat N, Pascual L, Le Paslier MC, Sauvage C, Bauchet G, Bérard A, Bounon R, Tchoumakov M, Brunel D, et al. 2013. Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events. BMC Genomics. 14(1):791.10.1186/1471-2164-14-791
  • Chen J, Wang H, Shen H, Chai M, Li J, Qi M, Yang W. 2009. Genetic variation in tomato populations from four breeding programs revealed by single nucleotide polymorphism and simple sequence repeat markers. Sci Hort. 122:6–16.10.1016/j.scienta.2009.03.025
  • Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 6:80–92.10.4161/fly.19695
  • Conesa MA, Galmes J, Ochogavia JM, March J, Jaume J, Martorell A, Francis DM, Medrano H, Roce JKC, Cifre J. 2014. The postharvest tomato fruit quality of long shelf-life Mediterranean landraces is substantially influenced by irrigation regimes. Postharvest Biol Tec. 93:114–121.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.02.014
  • Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z. 2010. AgriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:W64–W70.10.1093/nar/gkq310
  • Ercolano MR, Sacco A, Ferriello F, D’Alessandro R, Tononi P, Traini A, Barone A, Zago E, Chiusano ML, Buson G, et al. 2014. Patchwork sequencing of tomato San Marzano and Vesuviano varieties highlights genome-wide variations. BMC Genomics. 15:138.10.1186/1471-2164-15-138
  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 14(8):2611–2620.10.1111/mec.2005.14.issue-8
  • Hamblin MT, Warburton ML, Buckler ES. 2007. Empirical comparison of Simple Sequence Repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms in assessment of maize diversity and relatedness. PLoS ONE. 2:e1367.10.1371/journal.pone.0001367
  • Hamilton JP, Sim SC, Stoffel K, Van Deynze A, Buell CR, Francis DM. 2012. Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in cultivated tomato via sequencing by synthesis. Plant Genome. 5(1):17–29.10.3835/plantgenome2011.12.0033
  • Iovieno P, Punzo P, Guida G, Mistretta C, Van Oosten MJ, Nurcato R, Bostan H, Colantuono C, Costa A, Bagnaresi P, et al. 2016. Transcriptomic changes drive physiological responses to progressive drought stress and rehydration in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 7:371.
  • Kevany BM, Tieman DM, Taylor MG, Cin VD, Klee HJ. 2007. Ethylene receptor degradation controls the timing of ripening in tomato fruit. Plant Journal. 51(3):458–467.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03170.x
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 33(7):1870–1874.10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Li J, Tao X, Li L, Mao L, Luo Z, Khan ZU, Ying T. 2016. Comprehensive RNA-Seq analysis on the regulation of tomato ripening by exogenous auxin. PLOS ONE 11(5):e0156453.10.1371/journal.pone.0156453
  • Lin T, Zhu G, Zhang J, Xu X, Yu Q, Zheng Z, Zhang Z, Lun Y, Li S, Wang X, et al. 2014. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat Genet. 46(11):1220–1226.10.1038/ng.3117
  • Mazzucato A, Papa R, Bitocchi E, Mosconi P, Nanni L, Negri V, Picarella ME, Siligato F, Soressi GP, Tiranti B, et al. 2008. Genetic diversity, structure and marker-trait associations in a collection of Italian tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Theor Appl Genet. 116(5):657–669.10.1007/s00122-007-0699-6
  • Mercati F, Leone M, Lupini A, Sorgonà A, Bacchi M, Abenavoli MR, Sunseri F. 2013. Genetic diversity and population structure of a common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) collection from Calabria (Italy). Genet Resour Crop Ev. 60(3):839–852.10.1007/s10722-012-9879-6
  • Mercati F, Longo C, Poma D, Araniti F, Lupini A, Mammano MM, Fiore MC, Abenavoli MR, Sunseri M. 2015. Genetic variation of an Italian long shelf-life tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) collection by using SSR and morphological fruit traits. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 62:721–732.10.1007/s10722-014-0191-5
  • Monti LM, Santangelo E, Corrado G, Rao R, Soressi GP, Scarascia Mugnozza GT. 2004. Il “San Marzano”: problematiche e prospettive in relazione alla sua salvaguardia e alla necessità di interventi genetici. Agroindustria. 3:161–170.
  • Mou W, Li D, Bu J, Jiang Y, Khan ZU, Luo Z, Mao L, Ying T. 2016. Comprehensive analysis of ABA effects on ethylene biosynthesis and signaling during tomato fruit ripening. PLoS ONE. 11(4): e0154072.10.1371/journal.pone.0154072
  • Moyle LC, Muir CD. 2010. Reciprocal insights into adaptation from agricultural and evolutionary studies in tomato. Evol Appl. 3(5–6):409–421.10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00143.x
  • Nakazato T, Bogonovich M, Moyle LC. 2008. Environmental factors predict adaptive phenotypic differentiation within and between two wild Andean tomatoes. Evolution. 62(4):774–792.10.1111/evo.2008.62.issue-4
  • Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.
  • Page RD. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci. 12(4):357–358.
  • Parisi M, Aversano R, Graziani G, Ruggieri V, Senape V, Sigillo L, Barone A. 2016. Phenotypic and molecular diversity in a collection of ‘Pomodoro di Sorrento’ Italian tomato landrace. Sci Hort. 203:143–151.10.1016/j.scienta.2016.02.038
  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155(2):945–959.
  • Rick CM, Laterrot H, Philouze J. 1990. A revised key for the Lycopersicon species. Tomato Genet Cooperative Rep. 40:31.
  • Ruggieri V, Francese G, Sacco A, D’Alessandro A, Rigano MM, Parisi M, Milone M, Cardi T, Mennella G, Barone A. 2014. An association mapping approach to identify favourable alleles for tomato fruit quality breeding. BMC Plant Biol. 14:17.10.1186/s12870-014-0337-9
  • Sacco A, Ruggieri V, Parisi M, Festa G, Rigano MM, Picarella ME, Mazzucato A, Barone A. 2015. Exploring a tomato landraces collection for fruit-related traits by the aid of a high-throughput genomic platform. PLoS ONE. 10(9):e0137139.10.1371/journal.pone.0137139
  • Seymour GB, Østergaard L, Chapman NH, Knapp S, Martin C. 2013. Fruit development and ripening. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 64:219–241.10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120057
  • Sharma M, Pandey GK. 2016. Expansion and function of repeat domain proteins during stress and development in plants. Front Plant Sci. 6:1218.
  • Sim SC, Van Deynze A, Stoffel K, Douches DS, Zarka D, Ganal MW, Chetelat RT, Hutton SF, Scott JW, Gardner RG, et al. 2012. High-density SNP genotyping of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) reveals patterns of genetic variation due to breeding. PLoS ONE. 7(9):e45520.10.1371/journal.pone.0045520
  • Sim SC, Kim M, Chung SM, Park Y. 2015. Assessing the genetic variation in cultivated tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hortic Environ Biotec. 56(6):800–810.10.1007/s13580-015-0107-0
  • Siracusa L, Patanè C, Avola G, Ruberto G. 2012. Polyphenols as chemotaxonomic markers in Italian “long storage” tomato genotypes. J Agr Food Chem. 60(1):309–314.10.1021/jf203858y
  • Siracusa L, Patanè C, Rizzo V, Cosentino SL, Ruberto G. 2018. Targeted secondary metabolic and physico-chemical traits analysis to assess genetic variability within a germplasm collection of “long storage” tomatoes. Food Chem. 244:275–283.10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.043
  • Stich B, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Maurer HP, Heckenberger M, Reif JC. 2005. Linkage disequilibrium in European elite maize germplasm investigated with SSRs. Theor Appl Genet. 111(4):723–730.10.1007/s00122-005-2057-x
  • Sunkar R, Zhu JK. 2004. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 16(8):2001–2019.10.1105/tpc.104.022830
  • Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. 2011. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of Gene Ontology terms. PLoS ONE. 6(7):e21800.10.1371/journal.pone.0021800
  • The Tomato Genome Consortium. 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 485:635–641.
  • Tranchida-Lombardo V, Aiese Cigliano R, Anzar I, Landi S, Palombieri S, Colantuoni C, Bostan H, Termolino P, Aversano R, Batelli G, et al. 2017. Whole-genome re-sequencing of two Italian tomato landraces reveals sequence variations in genes associated with stress tolerance, fruit quality and long shelf-life traits. DNA Res. 25(2):149–160.
  • Van Deynze A, Stoffel K, Buell CR, Kozik A, Liu J, van der Knaap E, Francis D. 2007. Diversity in conserved genes in tomato. BMC Genomics. 8:465.10.1186/1471-2164-8-465
  • Wang KL-C, Li H, Ecker JR. 2002. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell. 14:s131–s151.10.1105/tpc.001768
  • Williams C, Clair DA. 1993. Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome. 36(3):619–630.10.1139/g93-083
  • Wilson RL, Kim H, Bakshi A, Binder BM. 2014. The ethylene receptors ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 and ETHYLENE RESPONSE2 have contrasting roles in seed germination of Arabidopsis during salt stress. Plant Physiol. 165(3):1353–1366.10.1104/pp.114.241695
  • Wu J, Wang J, Pan C, Guan X, Wang Y, Liu S, He Y, Chen J, Chen L, Lu G. 2014. Genome-wide identification of MAPKK and MAPKKK gene families in tomato and transcriptional profiling analysis during development and stress response. PLoS ONE. 9(7):e103032.10.1371/journal.pone.0103032
  • Xu R. 2014. Genome-wide analysis and identification of stress-responsive genes of the CCCH zinc finger family in Solanum lycopersicum. Mol Genet Genomics. 289(5): 965–979.
  • Zheng X, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS. 2012. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics. 28(24):3326–3328.10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.