Stem anatomy of Turbinicarpus s.l. (Cacteae, Cactaceae) and its contribution to systematics

References

• Anderson EF. 1986. A revision of the genus Neolloydia B. & R. (Cactaceae). Bradleya. 4:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson EF. 1987. A revision of the genus Thelocactus B. & R. (Cactaceae). Bradleya. 5:49–76.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson EF. 2001. The cactus family. Portland: Timber Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson EF, Boke NH. 1969. The genus Pelecyphora (Cactaceae): resolution of a controversy. Amer J Bot. 56(3):314–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson EF, Ralston ME. 1978. A study of Thelocactus (Cactaceae), the status of the proposed genus Gymnocactus. Cact Succ J (US). 50:216–224.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson EF, Skillman SM. 1984. A comparison of Aztekium and Strombocactus (Cactaceae). Syst Bot. 9(1):42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angyalossy V, Pace MR, Evert RF, Marcati CR, Oskolski AA, Terrazas T, Kotina E, Lens F, Mazzoni-Viveiros SC, Angeles G, et al. 2016. IAWA list of microscopic bark features. IAWA J. 37(4):517–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárcenas RT, Yesson C, Hawkins JA. 2011. Molecular systematics of the Cactaceae. Cladistics. 27(5):470–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárcenas-Argüello ML, Gutiérrez-Castorena MC, Terrazas T. 2015. The polymorphic weddellite crystals in three species of Cephalocereus (Cactaceae). Micron. 77:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boke NH. 1959. Endomorphic and ectomorphic characters in Pelecyphora and Encephalocarpus. Amer J Bot. 46(3):197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boke NH, Anderson EF. 1970. Development, and taxonomy in the genus Lophophora. Amer J Bot. 57(5):569–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Hollis H, Marshall WT. 1956. A revision of the genus Toumeya. Saguaro Bull. 10:112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo-Hollis H, Sánchez-Mejorada H. 1991. Las cactáceas de México. Vol.II. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth CA, Cota-Sanchez JH, Wallace RS. 2002. Molecular systematic of tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae): a phylogeny based on rpl16 intron sequence variation. Syst Bot. 27:257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum F, Oehme H. 1942. Cactaceae. Jahrb Deutsch Kakt Ges. 118:24.
   Google Scholar
• Donati D, Zanovello C. 2004. Knowing, understanding, and growing Turbinicarpus-Rapicactus. Trento: Cactus Trentino Südtirol.
   Google Scholar
• Donati D, Bianchi C, Pezzi G, Conte L, Hofer A, Chiarucci A. 2017. Biogeography and ecology of the genus Turbinicarpus (Cactaceae): environmental controls of taxa richness and morphology. Syst Biodiv. 15(4):361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doweld AB. 1998. A phylogenetic outline of the system of classifications of the tribe Cacteae. System of classification of subtribes Pediocactinae-Thelocactinae-Coryphantinae. Succulents (Moscow). 1:15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Eggli U. 1984. Stomatal types of Cactaceae. Pl Syst Evol. 146(3–4):197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores VE. 1999. La planta: estructura y función. Vol.I. San José: Libro Universitario Regional.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschi VR, Nakata PA. 2005. Calcium oxalate in plants: formation and function. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 56:41–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia JDS, Scremin-Dias E, Soffiatti P. 2012. Stem and root anatomy of two species of Echinopsis (Trichocereeae: Cactaceae). Rev Mex Biodiv. 83:1036–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Aguilar MA, Terrazas T, Arias S. 2009. Anatomía caulinar de tres especies del género Hylocereus (Berger) Britton & Rose (Cactaceae) en México. Rev Fitotec Mex. 32:201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasson P. 1981. Epidermal anatomy of some North American globular cacti. Cact Succ J Gr Brit. 43:101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson AC. 1996. Structure-function relations of warm desert plants. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Glass C, Foster T. 1977. A revision of the genus Turbinicarpus (Backeb.) Buxb. & Backeb. Cact Succ J (US). 52:227–228.
   Google Scholar
• Grego-Valencia D, Terrazas T, Vazquez-Sánchez M, Arias S. 2014. Ferocactus (Cactaceae) epidermis: its systematic value. J Torrey Bot Soc. 141(4):313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán U, Arias S, Dávila P. 2003. Catálogo de cactáceas Mexicanas. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México & Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.
   Google Scholar
• Halda JJ. 1998. A new system of the genus Pediocactus Britton & Rose. Acta Mus Richnov, Sect Nat. 5:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hartl WP, Klapper H, Barbier B, Jurgen Ensikat H, Dronskowski R, Muller P, Ostendorp G, Tye A, Bauer R, Barthlott W. 2007. Diversity of calcium oxalate crystals in Cactaceae. Can J Bot. 85(5):501–517.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Hernández T, Hernández HM, De-Nova JA, Puente R, Eguiarte LE, Magallón S. 2011. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophillales, Eudicotyledonae). Am J Bot. 98(1):44–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt DR, Taylor NP, Glass H. 2006. The new cactus lexicon. Milborne Port: Remous Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt DR. 2016. CITES Cactaceae checklist. 3rd ed. Milborne Port: Royal Botanical Garden Kew and International Organization for Succulent Plant Study.
   Google Scholar
• IAWA Committee. 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bull ns. 10:219–332.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red list of threatened species. Version 2016-2. www.iucnredlist.org. 21 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kay QON, Daoud HS, Stirton CH. 1981. Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petals. Bot J Linnean Soc. 83(1):57–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W. 2009. Multifunctional surface structures of plants: an inspiration for biomimetics. Prog Mater Sci. 54(2):137–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesche J, Pace MR, Xu Q, Li Y, Chen S. 2017. Height-related scaling of phloem anatomy and the evolution of sieve element end wall types in woody plants. New Phytol. 214(1):245–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loza-Cornejo S, Terrazas T. 1996. Anatomía del tallo y de la raíz de dos especies de Wilcoxia Britton & Rose (Cactaceae) del noreste de México. Bol Soc Bot Mex. 59:13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Loza-Cornejo S, Terrazas T. 2003. Epidermal and hypodermal characteristics in North American Cactoideae (Cactaceae). J Plant Res. 116:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüthy JM. 2003a. Comments on Turbinicarpus and a key to species. Turbi-now. 14:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lüthy JM. 2003b. Rapicactus Buxbaum & Oehme: revision of the genus. Cactus & Co. 7:4–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mauseth JD. 1988. Plant anatomy. Redwood City: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mauseth JD. 1993. Medullary bundles and the evolution of cacti. Amer J Bot. 80(8):928–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauseth JD. 2004. Wide-band tracheids are present in almost all species of Cactaceae. J Plant Res. 117(1):69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauseth JD. 2006a. Blossffeldia lacks cortical bundles and persistent epidermis; is it basal within Cactoideae?. Bradleya. 24:73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mauseth JD. 2006b. Structure-function relationshiops in highly modified shoots of Cactaceae. Ann Bot. 98(5):901–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauseth JD, Plemons-Rodriguez B. 1998. Evolution of extreme xeromorphic characters in wood: a study of nine evolutionary lines in Cactaceae. Am J Bot. 85(2):209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauseth JD, Sajeva M. 1992. Cortical bundles in the persistent, photosynthetic stems of cacti. Ann Bot. 70(4):317–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Media Cybernetics. 2006. Image-Pro Plus. Version 6.1 for Windows. Bethesda: Media Cybernetics.
   Google Scholar
• Monje PV, Barán EJ. 2002. Characterization of calcium oxalates generated as biominerals in cacti. Plant Physiol. 128(2):707–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosco A. 2009. Micro-morphology and anatomy of Turbinicarpus (Cactaceae) spines. Rev Mex Biodiv. 80119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyffeler R, Eggli U. 1997. Comparative stem anatomy and systematics of Eriosyce sensu lato (Cactaceae). Ann Bot. 80(6):767–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzin ES. 1999. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SEMARNAT. 2010. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF), del jueves 30 de diciembre de 2010. Consulted 5 August, 2016: www.profepa.gob.mx/innovaportal/file/435/1/NOM_059_SEMARNAT_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Soffiatti P, Angyalossy V. 2003. Stem anatomy of Cipocereus (Cactaceae). Bradleya. 21:39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sotomayor M, Arredondo- Gomez A, Sanchez-Barra FR, Martinez-Mendez M. 2004. The genus Turbinicarpus in San Luis Potosi. Venegono: Cactus & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Terrazas T, Loza-Cornejo S, Arreola-Nava HJ. 2005. Anatomía caulinar de las especies de género Stenocereus (Cactaceae). Act Bot Venez. 28:331–336.
   Google Scholar
• Terrazas T, Escamilla-Molina R, Vázquez-Sánchez M. 2016. Variation in the tracheary elements in species of Coryphantha (Cacteae-Cactoideae) with contrasting morphology: the bottleneck model. Braz J Bot. 39(2):669–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrazas-Salgado T, Mauseth JD. 2002. Shoot anatomy and morphology. In: Nobel PS, editor. Cacti: biology and uses. Berkeley: University of California Press; p. 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T. 2011. Stem and wood allometric relationships in Cacteae (Cactaceae). Trees. 25(5):755–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T, Arias S, Ochoterena H. 2013. Molecular phylogeny, origin and taxonomic implications of the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae). Syst Biodiv. 11(1):103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T, Grego-Valencia D, Arias S. 2017. Growth form and wood evolution in the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae). Willdenowia. 47(1):49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson PH. 1988. Stomata. In: Metcalfe CR, Chalk L, editors. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Vol.I. Oxford: Clarendon Press; p. 97–117.
   Google Scholar