Coppicing and plant diversity in a lowland wood remnant in North–East Italy

References

• Abramo E, Michelutti G. 1998. Guida ai suoli forestali nella regione Friuli-Venezia Giulia. Udine: Arte Grafiche Friulane.
   Google Scholar
• Alberti G, Boscutti F, Pirotti F, Bertacco C, De Simon G, Sigura M, Cazorzi F, Bonfanti P. 2013. A LiDAR-based approach for a multi-purpose characterization of Alpine forests: an Italian case study. iForest Biogeosci Forestry. 6(3):156–168.
   Google Scholar
• Amorini E, Fabbio G, Bertini G. 2010. Dinamica del ceduo oltre turno e avviamento ad alto fusto dei cedui di faggio. Risultati Del Protocollo “Germano Gambi” Sull ’ Alpe di Catenaia (Arezzo). Ann CRA Centro Ric Selv. 36:151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnaresi U. 1980. Il problema dei cedui e i vincoli all’uso dei boschi. Natura e Montagna. 3:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bartha S, Merolli A, Campetella G, Canullo R. 2008. Changes of vascular plant diversity along a chronosequence of beech coppice stands, central Apennines, Italy. Plant Biosystems. 142(3):572–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benassi A. 1981. Aspetti economici e sociali del bosco ceduo e della sua conversione in fustaia. Ann Accadem Ital Sci Forestali. 30:303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas SR, Mallik AU. 2010. Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology. 91(1):28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciancio O. 1983. Considerazioni sul problema ceduo: obiettivi e ipotesti di sviluppo. Italia Agricola. CXX:87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ciancio O. 1990. La gestione del bosco ceduo: analisi e prospettive. L’Italia Forestale e Montana. 1:5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Connell JH. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science. 199(4335):1302–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debussche M, Debussche G, Lepart J. 2001. Changes in the vegetation of Quercus pubescens woodland after cessation of coppicing and grazing. J Vegetat Sci. 12(1):81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Alard D, Saguez R, Wattez-Franger A, De Foucault B, Delelis-Dusollier A, Bardat J. 2004. Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understorey response to two silvicultural systems. J Appl Ecol. 41(6):1065–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douda J, Boublík K, Doudová J, Kyncl M. 2017. Traditional forest management practices stop forest succession and bring back rare plant species. J Appl Ecol. 54(3):761–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellenberg H. 1974. Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta Geobotan. 9:1–97.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson U. 2009. The rural landscapes of Europe. Stockholm: Formas.
   Google Scholar
• Del Favero R. 2004. I boschi delle regioni alpine italiane. Padova: CLEUP.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti F, Sboarina C, Tattoni C, Vitti A, Zatelli P, Geri F, Pompei E, Ciolli M. 2016. The 1936 Italian Kingdom Forest Map reviewed: a dataset for landscape and ecological research. Ann Silvicultural Res. 42(1)
   Google Scholar
• Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A. 2003. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience. 53(1):77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster BL, Tilman D. 2000. Dynamic and static views of succession: testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach. Plant Ecol. 146(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Führer E. 1998. Oak decline in Central Europe: a synopsis of hypotheses. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-247.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparini P, Tabacchi G. 2011. L’Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei serbatoi forestali di Carbonio INFC 2005. Secondo inventario forestale nazionale italiano. Metodi e risultati. [place unknown]: Ministero delle Politiche Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali; Corpo Forestale dello Stato. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura, Unità di ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale. Edagricole-Il Sole 24 ore, Bologna.
   Google Scholar
• Giordani P. 2012. Assessing the effects of forest management on epiphytic lichens in coppiced forests using different indicators. Plant Biosyst. 146:628–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondard H, Romane F, Grandjanny M, Li J, Aronson J. 2001. Plant species diversity changes in abandoned chestnut (Castanea sativa) groves in southern France. Biodivers Conserv. 10(2):189–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondard H, Romane F, Regina IS, Leonardi S. 2006. Forest management and plant species diversity in chestnut stands of three mediterranean areas. Biodivers Conserv. 15(4):1129–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götmark F. 2007. Careful partial harvesting in conservation stands and retention of large oaks favour oak regeneration. Biol Conserv. 140(3-4):349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graae BJ, Sunde PB. 2000. The impact of forest continuity and management on forest floor vegetation evaluated by species traits. Ecography. 23(6):720–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino R, Domina G, Pignatti S. 2012. Ellenberg’s indicator values for the flora of Italy–first update: Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae and Monocotyledoneae. Flora Mediterranea. 22:197–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond DS, Gourlet-Fleury S, van der Hout P, ter Steege H, Brown VK. 1996. A compilation of known Guianan timber trees and the significance of their dispersal mode, seed size and taxonomic affinity to tropical rain forest management. Forest Ecol Manag. 83(1-2):99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hédl R, Kopecký M, Komárek J. 2010. Half a century of succession in a temperate oakwood: from species-rich community to mesic forest. Divers Distribut. 16(2):267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hédl R, Šipoš J, Chudomelová M, Utinek D. 2017. Dynamics of herbaceous vegetation during four years of experimental coppice introduction. Folia Geobotanica . 52(1):83–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister J, Mihaljevič M, Hošek J. 2004. The spread of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in some European oak forests: an effect of nitrogen deposition or successional change? Forest Ecol Manag. 203(1-3):35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katovai E, Burley AL, Mayfield MM. 2012. Understory plant species and functional diversity in the degraded wet tropical forests of Kolombangara Island, Solomon Islands. Biol Conserv. 145(1):214–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby KJ, Buckley GP, Mills J. 2017. Biodiversity implications of coppice decline, transformations to high forest and coppice restoration in British woodland. Folia Geobotanica. 52(1):5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby KJ, Thomas RC. 2000. Changes in the ground flora in Wytham Woods, southern England from 1974 to 1991—implications for nature conservation. J Vegetat Sci. 11(6):871–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberté E, Legendre P. 2010. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology. 91(1):299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberté E, Shipley B. 2011. FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R Package Version. 1:0–11.
   Google Scholar
• Landolt E, Baumler B, Erhadt A, Hegg O, Klotzi F, Lammler W, Urmi E. 2010. Flora indicativa–ecological indicator values and biological attributes of the flora of Switzerland and the Alps. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Lassauce A, Anselle P, Lieutier F, Bouget C. 2012. Coppice-with-standards with an overmature coppice component enhance saproxylic beetle biodiversity: a case study in French deciduous forests. Forest Ecol Manag. 266:273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lingoes J. 1971. Some boundary conditions for a monotone analysis of symmetric matrices. Psychometrika. 36(2):195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnago LFS, Edwards DP, Edwards FA, Magrach A, Martins SV, Laurance WF. 2014. Functional attributes change but functional richness is unchanged after fragmentation of Brazilian Atlantic forests. J Ecol. 102(2):475–485. Bellingham P, editor.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairota P, Buckley P, Suchomel C, Heinsoo K, Verheyen K, Hédl R, Terzuolo PG, Sindaco R, Carpanelli A. 2016. Integrating conservation objectives into forest management: coppice management and forest habitats in Natura 2000 sites. Italian Soc Silvicult Forest Ecol. 9:560. http://www.sisef.it/iforest.
   Google Scholar
• Mason F. 2001. Problematiche di conservazione e gestione. In: Ruffo S, editor. Le Foreste della Pianura Padana Un labirinto dissolto. Udine: Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale; p. 91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Mattioli W, Mancini LD, Portoghesi L, Corona P. 2016. Biodiversity conservation and forest management: the case of the sweet chestnut coppice stands in Central Italy. Plant Biosystems. 150(3):592–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath MJ, Luyssaert S, Meyfroidt P, Kaplan JO, Bürgi M, Chen Y, Erb K, Gimmi U, McInerney D, Naudts K, et al. 2015. Reconstructing European forest management from 1600 to 2010. Biogeosciences. 12(14):4291–4316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney DW, Yemshanov D, Fraleigh S, Allen D, Preto F. 2011. An economic assessment of the use of short-rotation coppice woody biomass to heat greenhouses in southern Canada. Biomass Bioenergy. 35(1):374–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagnoli A, Terzaghi M, Iorio AD, Scippa GS, Chiatante D. 2012. Fine-root seasonal pattern, production and turnover rate of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands in Italy Prealps: Possible implications of coppice conversion to high forest. Plant Biosystems. 146(4):1012–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. 2010. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Functional Ecology. 24(4):867–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müllerová J, Hédl R, Szabó P. 2015. Coppice abandonment and its implications for species diversity in forest vegetation. For Ecol Manage. 343:88–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Guillaume F, Friendly B, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P. 2017. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-3.
   Google Scholar
• Pakeman RJ. 2011. Functional diversity indices reveal the impacts of land use intensification on plant community assembly. J Ecol. 99(5):1143–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piussi P. 1976. Un inventario forestale del XVIII secolo per i boschi costieri dell’alto Adriatico. Roma: Emme-kappa.
   Google Scholar
• Poldini L. 2002. Nuovo Atlante Corologico delle Piante Vascolari nel Friuli-Venezia Giulia. Udine: Regione Autonoma Friuli-Venizia Giulia.
   Google Scholar
• Poorter L, Bongers F. 2006. Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology. 87(7):1733–1743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Salomón R, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, González-Doncel I, Gil L, Valbuena-Carabaña M. 2017. On the general failure of coppice conversion into high forest in Quercus pyrenaica stands: a genetic and physiological approach. Folia Geobotanica. 52(1):101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolastri A, Bricca A, Cancellieri L, Cutini M. 2017. Understory functional response to different management strategies in Mediterranean beech forests (central Apennines, Italy). Forest Ecol Manag. 400:665–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šebesta J, Maděra P, Řepka R, Matula R. 2017. Comparison of vascular plant diversity and species composition of coppice and high beech forest in the Banat region, Romania. Folia Geobotanica. 52(1):33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sguazzin F. 2008. I boschi di latifoglie della bassa pianura friulana. In: Bini G, editor. I boschi della Bassa Friulana. Edizioni La Bassa; p. 19–76.
   Google Scholar
• Šipoš J, Hédl R, Hula V, Chudomelová M, Košulič O, Niedobová J, Riedl V. 2017. Patterns of functional diversity of two trophic groups after canopy thinning in an abandoned coppice. Folia Geobotanica. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 2001. Functional diversity, In: Levin SA, editor. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Academic Press, p. 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• USS Working Group WRB 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Van Calster H, Baeten L, De Schrijver A, De Keersmaeker L, Rogister JE, Verheyen K, Hermy M. 2007. Management driven changes (1967–2005) in soil acidity and the understorey plant community following conversion of a coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecol Managem. 241(1-3):258–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Calster H, Chevalier R, van Wyngene B, Archaux F, Verheyen K, Hermy M. 2008. Long-term seed bank dynamics in a temperate forest under conversion from coppice-with-standards to high forest management. Appl Veg Sci. 11(2):251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vild O, Rolecek J, Hedl R, Kopecky M, Utinek D. 2013. Experimental restoration of coppice-with-standards: Response of understorey vegetation from the conservation perspective. Forest Ecol Manag. 310:234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. 2008. New dimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology. 89(8):2290–2301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whigham DF. 2004. Ecology of Woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35(1):583–621.
   Google Scholar
• Wildi O. 2013. Data analysis in vegetation ecology. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar