Karyotypic variability in Calliandra sect. Androcallis (Leguminosae–Caesalpinioideae)

References

• Almeida CCS, Carvalho PCL, Guerra M. 2007. Karyotype differentiation among Spondias species and the putative hybrid Umbu-cajá (Anacardiaceae). Bot J Linnean Soc. 155(4):541–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves MAO, de Carvalho Custódio AV. 1983. Cytogenetics of legumes collected in the state of Ceará. Braz J Genet. 12:81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Barneby R. 1998. Silk tree, guanacaste, monkey’s earring: a generic system for the synandrous Mimosaceae of the Americas. Part. III. Calliandra. Mem New York Bot Gard. 74:1–223.
   Google Scholar
• Barros e Silva AE, Guerra M. 2010. The meaning of DAPI bands observed after C-banding and FISH procedures. Biotech Histochem. 85(2):115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho CR, Saraiva LS. 1993. An air drying technique for maize chromosomes without enzymatic maceration. Biotech Histochem. 68(3):142–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman JR, Demenezes E. 1980. Chromosome numbers in Leguminosae from the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rhodora. 82:475–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant GC, Birchler JA, Pires JC. 2014. Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 19:91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini N, Rossi F, Giordano E, Caizzi R, Vern F, Dimitri P. 2007. Drosophila melanogaster as a model for studying protein-encoding genes that are resident in constitutive heterochromatin. Heredity. 98(1):3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa L, Oliveira Á, Carvalho-Sobrinho J, Souza G. 2017. Comparative cytomolecular analyses reveal karyotype variability related to biogeographic and species richness patterns in Bombacoideae (Malvaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 303(9):1131–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Silva S, Mendes S, Soares Filho WS, Pedrosa-Harand A. 2015. Chromosome homologies between Citrus and Poncirus – the comparative cytogenetic map of mandarin (Citrus reticulate). Tree Genet Genomes. 11(1):811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmer N, Simon MF, Schifino-Wittmann MT, Hughes CE, Miotto STS, Giuliani JC. 2011. Chromosome numbers in the genus Mimosa L.: cytotaxonomic and evolutionary implications. Plant Syst Evol. 291(3–4):211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo MF, Bruno RLA, Barros e Silva AE, Nascimento S, Oliveira IG, Felix LP. 2014. Intraspecific and interspecific polyploidy of Brazilian species of the genus Inga (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Genet Mol Res. 13(2):3395–3403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P. 1981. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers 1975–1978. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. Vol. 5. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; p. 1–553.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P. 1984. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers 1979–1981. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. Vol. 8. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; p. 1–427.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P, Davidse G. 1977. Chromosome numbers in legumes. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 64(1):121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P, Johnson D. 1998. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers 1994–1995. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. Vol. 69. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; p. 1–208.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra M. 2000. Patterns of heterochromatin distribution in plant chromosomes. Genet Mol Biol. 23(4):1029–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra M, Souza MJ. 2002. How to observe chromosomes: a guide to techniques in plant, animal and human cytogenetics. Ribeirão Preto: FUNPEC; 132 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández HM. 1986. Zapoteca: a new genus of neotropical Mimosoideae. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 73:755–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2004. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc. 82(4):651–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos JR. 2004. Floristic composition of Serra da Capivara National Park, Piauí, Brazil. Rodriguésia. 55(85):55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52(2):201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GP, Schride BD, Mackinder BA, Lock M. 2005. Legumes of the world. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; p. 577.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis GP, Schrire BD, Mackinder BA, Rico L, Clark R. 2013. A 2013 linear sequence of legume genera set in a phylogenetic context: a tool for collections management and taxon sampling. South Afr J Bot. 89:76–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewke Bandara N, Papini A, Mosti S, Brown T, Smith L. 2013. A phylogenetic analysis of genus Onobrychis and its relationships within the tribe Hedysareae (Fabaceae).Turk J Bot. 37(6):981–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Dolezel J, Santos C. 2007. Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: a test with 37 species. Ann Bot. 100(4):875–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LPWG. 2013. Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades. Taxon. 62:217–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LPWG. 2017. A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon. 66:44–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merita K, Kattukunnel JJ, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR. 2015. Comparative analysis of heterochromatin distribution in wild and cultivated Abelmoschus species based on fluorescent staining methods. Protoplasma. 252(2):657–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaghaderi G, Marzangi K. 2015. IdeoKar: an ideogram constructing and karyotype analyzing software. Caryologia. 68(1):31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer J, Leitch IJ. 2014. The application of flow cytometry for estimating genome size and ploidy level in plants. In: Besse P, editor. Molecular plant taxonomy. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; p. 279–307.
   Google Scholar
• Poggio L, Espert SM, Fortunato RH. 2008. Evolutionary cytogenetics in American Legumes. Rodriguésia. 59(3):423–433.
   Google Scholar
• Queiroz LP. 2009. Caatinga Legumes. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Feira de Santana: State University of Feira de Santana, 443 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 33(1):589–639.
   Google Scholar
• Santos E, Carvalho R, Almeida EM, Felix LP. 2012. Chromosome number variation and evolution in Neotropical Leguminosae (Mimosoideae) from northeastern Brazil. Genet Mol Res. 11(3):2451–2475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrire BD, Lavin M, Lewis GP. 2005a. Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies. Biol Skr. 55:375–422.
   Google Scholar
• Schrire BD, Lewis GP, Lavin M. 2005b. Biogeography of the Leguminosae. In: Lewis GP, Schrire B, MacKinder B, Lock M, editors. Legumes of the world. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; p. 21–54.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer D. 1976. Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma. 58(4):307–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijo GJ. 1993. Cytogenetics in Argentine species of the Mimosa genus (Leguminosae). Bol Soc Argent Bot. 29:219–223.
   Google Scholar
• Seijo GJ. 1999. Chromosome studies in Argentinean species of Mimosa. Cytologia. 64(3):241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Seijo GJ, Fernández A. 2001. Chromosome numbers of some southernmost species of Mimosa L. (Leguminosae). Cytologia. 66:19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Shamurailatpam A, Madhavan L, Ramachandra S, Yadav V, Bhat K, Rao SR. 2015. Heterochromatin characterization through differential fluorophore binding pattern in some species of Vigna savi. Protoplasma. 252(2):629–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva SC, Martins MIG, Santos RC, Peñaloza APS, Melo Filho PA, Benko-Iseppon AM, Valls JFM, Carvalho R. 2010. Karyological features and banding patterns in Arachis species belonging to the Heteranthae section. Plant Syst Evol. 285(3–4):201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza ER de. 2001. Taxonomic and biogeographic aspects of the genus Calliandra Benth. (Leguminosae - Mimosoideae) in Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil [Dissertation (Master in Botany)]. Feira de Santana: Department of Biological Sciences, State University of Feira de Santana; 187 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa SM de, Reis AC, Viccini LF. 2013. Polyploidy, B chromosomes, and heterochromatin characterization of Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. (Fabaceae-Mimosoideae). Tree Genet Genomes. 9:613–619. doi: 10.1007/s11295-012-0567-7.
   Google Scholar
• Souza ER de, Queiroz LP. 2004. Two new species of Calliandra Benth. (Leguminosae - Mimosoideae) from Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil. Rev Bras Bot. 27(4):615–619.
   Google Scholar
• Souza ER, Lewis GP, Forest F, Schnadelbach AS, Berg C, Queiroz LP. 2013. Phylogeny of Calliandra (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) based on nuclear and plastid molecular markers. Taxon. 62:1200–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza G, Crosa O, Speranza P, Guerra M. 2016. Phylogenetic relations in tribe Leucocoryneae (Amaryllidaceae, Allioideae) and the validation of Zoellnerallium based on DNA sequences and cytomolecular data. Bot J Linn Soc. 182(4):811–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van-Lume B, Esposito T, Diniz-Filho JAF, Gagnon E, Lewis GP, Souza G. 2017. Heterochromatic and cytomolecular diversification in the Caesalpinia group (Leguminosae): relationships between phylogenetic and cytogeographical data. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 29:51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van-Lume B, Souza G. 2018. Cytomolecular analysis of species in the Peltophorum clade (Caesalpinioideae, Leguminosae). Braz J Bot. 41(2):385–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahara T, Javadi F, Onoda Y, Queiroz LP, Faith D, Prado DE, Akasaka M, Kadoya T, Ishihama F, Davies S, et al. 2013. Global legume diversity assessment: concepts, key indicators, and strategies. Taxon. 62(2):249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe KH. 2001. Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat Rev Genet. 2(5):333–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar