Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their biocontrol efficacy against phytopathogens of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

References

• Ahemad M, Kibret M. 2014. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci. 26(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK. 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 28(4):1327–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo-Polanco M, Sánchez-Romera B, Aroca R, Asins MJ, Declerck S, Dodd IC, Martínez-Andújar C, Albacete A, Ruiz-Lozano JM. 2016. Exploring the use of recombinant inbred lines in combination with beneficial microbial inoculants (AM fungus and PGPR) to improve drought stress tolerance in tomato. Environ Exp Bot. 131:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero P, Cavigliasso A, Príncipe A, Godino A, Jofré E, Mori G, Fischer S. 2012. Genetic diversity and antifungal activity of native Pseudomonas isolated from maize plants grown in a central region of Argentina. Syst Appl Microbiol. 35(5):342–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinesh R, Anandaraj M, Kumar A, Bini YK, Subila KP, Aravind R. 2015. Isolation, characterization, and evaluation of multi-trait plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for their growth promoting and disease suppressing effects on ginger. Microbiol Res. 173:34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta J, Handique PJ, Thakur D. 2015. Assessment of culturable tea rhizobacteria isolated from tea estates of Assam, India for growth promotion in commercial tea cultivars. Front Microbiol. 6:1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed WS, Akhkha A, El-Naggar MY, Elbadry M. 2014. In vitro antagonistic activity, plant growth promoting traits and phylogenetic affiliation of rhizobacteria associated with wild plants grown in arid soil. Front Microbiol. 5:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel V, Antoun H, Tweddell RJ. 2007. Growth stimulation and fruit yield improvement of greenhouse tomato plants by inoculation with Pseudomonas putida or Trichoderma atroviride: possible role of indole acetic acid (IAA). Soil Biol Biochem. 39(8):1968–1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobelak A, Napora A, Kacprzak M. 2015. Using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve plant growth. Ecol Eng. 84:22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami I, Hsouna AB, Hamdi N, Gdoura R, Triki MA. 2013. Isolation and characterization of rhizosphere bacteria for the biocontrol of the damping-off disease of tomatoes in Tunisia. C R Biol. 336(11–12):557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-León R, Rojas-Solís D, Contreras-Pérez M, Orozco-Mosqueda MdC, Macías-Rodríguez LI, Reyes-de la Cruz H, Valencia-Cantero E, Santoyo G. 2015. Characterization of the antifungal and plant growth-promoting effects of diffusible and volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Biol Cont. 81:83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Wei Z, Tan S, Mei X, Yin S, Shen Q, Xu Y. 2013. The rhizosphere soil of diseased tomato plants as a source for novel microorganisms to control bacterial wilt. Appl Soil Ecol. 72:79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain D, Sanadhya S, Saheewala H, Maheshwari D, Shukwal A, Singh PB, Meena RH, Choudhary R, Mohanty SR, Singh A. 2020. Molecular diversity analysis of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from groundnut and evaluation of their field efficacy. Curr Microbiol. 77(8):1550–1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavino M, Harish S, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Samiyappan R. 2010. Effect of chitinolytic PGPR on growth, yield and physiological attributes of banana (Musa sp.) under field conditions. Appl Soil Ecol. 45(2):71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesaulya H, Baharuddin Zakaria B, Syaiful SA. 2015. Isolation and physiological characterization of PGPR from potato plant rhizosphere in medium land of Buru Island. Procedia Food Sci. 3:190–199.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Prasanna R, Bidyarani N, Babu S, Mishra BK, Kumar A, Adak A, Jauhari S, Yadav K, Singh R, et al. 2013. Evaluating the plant growth promoting ability of thermotolerant bacteria and cyanobacteria and their interactions with seed spice crops. Sci Hortic. 164:94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK. 2012. Bacillus strains isolated from rhizosphere showed plant growth promoting and antagonistic activity against phytopathogens. Microbiol Res. 167(8):493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laslo É, György É, Mara G, Tamás É, Ábrahám B, Lányi S. 2012. Screening of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as potential microbial inoculants. Crop Prot. 40:43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeed A, Kaleem Abbasi M, Hameed S, Imran A, Rahim N. 2015. Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from wheat rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion. Front Microbiol. 6:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Absalón S, Rojas-Solís D, Hernández-León R, Prieto-Barajas C, Orozco-Mosqueda MDC, Peña-Cabriales JJ, Sakuda S, Valencia-Cantero E, Santoyo G. 2014. Potential use and mode of action of the new strain Bacillus thuringiensis UM96 for the biological control of the gray mold phytopathogen Botrytis cinerea. Biocont Sci Technol. 24:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramanandham P, Rajkumari J, Pattnaik S, Busi S. 2017. Biocontrol potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and Alternaria solani and tomato plant growth due to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Int J Veg Sci. 23(4):294–303.
   Google Scholar
• Park YS, Dutta S, Ann M, Raaijmakers JM, Park K. 2015. Promotion of plant growth by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SS101 via novel volatile organic compounds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 461(2):361–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeran MF, Nagendran K, Gandhi K, Raguchander T, Prabakar K. 2014. Water in oil based PGPR formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens (FP7) showed enhanced resistance against Colletotrichum musae. Crop Prot. 65:186–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarma MVRK, Kumar V, Saharan K, Srivastava R, Sharma AK, Prakash A, Sahai V, Bisaria VS. 2011. Application of inorganic carrier-based formulations of fluorescent Pseudomonads and Piriformospora indica on tomato plants and evaluation of their efficacy. J Appl Microbiol. 111(2):456–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvakumar G, Reetha R, Thamizhiniyan P. 2013. The PGPR as elicitors of plant defence mechanisms and growth stimulants on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). Bot Res Int. 6:47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 28(10):2731–2739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Mavrodi DV, Ke L, Mavrodi OV, Yang M, Thomashow LS, Zheng N, Weller DM, Zhang J. 2015. Biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activity of rhizobacteria from Chinese fields with contaminated soils. Microb Biotechnol. 8(3):404–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuttavanichakul W, Lawongsa P, Wongkaew S, Teaumroong N, Boonkerd N, Nomura N, Tittabutr P. 2012. Improvement of peanut rhizobial inoculant by incorporation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as biocontrol against the seed borne fungus Aspergillus niger. Biol Cont. 63(2):87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zain M, Yasmin S, Hafeez F. 2019. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting antagonistic bacteria from cotton and sugarcane plants for suppression of phytopathogenic Fusarium species. Iran J Biotech. 17(2):61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Khabbaz SE, Wang A, Li H, Abbasi PA. 2015. Detection and characterization of broad-spectrum antipathogen activity of novel rhizobacterial isolates and suppression of Fusarium crown and root rot disease of tomato. J Appl Microbiol. 118(3):685–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar