Diploids and polyploids in the Santolina chamaecyparissus complex (Asteraceae) show different karyotype asymmetry

References

• Afzal-Rafii Z, Vianot J, Ramade M, Bourreil P. 1985. Analyse des caractères caryologiques et écologiques de quelques taxons dans les massifs du Luberon, de Lure et du Mont Ventoux. Rev Cytol Biol Veg Botaniste. 8:33–62.
   Google Scholar
• Altınordu F, Peruzzi L, Yu Y, He X. 2016. A tool for the analysis of chromosomes: KaryoType. taxon. 65(3):586–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angiolini C, Bacchetta G. 2003. Analisi distributiva e studio fitosociologico delle comunità a Santolina insularis (Gennari ex Fiori) Arrigoni della Sardegna meridionale (Italia). Fitosociologia. 40:109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni PV. 1977. Santoline italiche nuove: some new Italian santolinas. Webbia. 32(1):129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni PV. 1982a. Santolina L. In: Pignatti S, editor. Flora d’Italia. 1st ed. Bologna, Italy: Edagricole. p. 64–65.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni PV. 1982b. Le piante endemiche della Sardegna. Boll Soc Sarda Sci Nat. 21:338–348.
   Google Scholar
• Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, Peruzzi L. 2017. Traditional karyomorphological studies: can they still provide a solid basis in plant systematics? Fl Medit. 27:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo L, Maiorca G, Franzoni J, Roma-Marzio F, Peruzzi L. 2020. A morphometric and karyological study of Onobrychis calabrica (Fabaceae), a neglected species endemic to Calabria, S Italy. Willdenowia. 50(2):217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo P, Frediani M, Gelati MT, Venora G, Cremonini R, Ruffini Castiglione M. 2013. Karyological and molecular characterisation of subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae). Pl Biosystems. 147(4):1242–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbajal R, Ortiz S, Sáez L, et al. 2019. Santolina L. In: Castroviejo SB, Benedí C, Buira A, editors. Flora iberica. Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC.
   Google Scholar
• Carta A, Bedini G, Peruzzi L. 2020. A deep dive into the ancestral chromosome number and genome size of flowering plants. New Phytol. 228(3):1097–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carta A, Peruzzi L. 2016. Testing the large genome constraint hypothesis: plant traits, habitat and climate seasonality in Liliaceae. New Phytol. 210(2):709–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodsworth S, Chase MW, Leitch AR. 2016. Is post-polyploidization diploidization the key to the evolutionary success of angiosperms? Bot J Linn Soc. 180(1):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Gallego P, Sáez L, Wajer J, Giacò A, Peruzzi L. 2021. Typification of the names Santolina ericoides and S. villosa (Asteraceae) revisited. Phytotaxa. 509(2):233–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh I, Saha PS, Bhowmick BKJ. Sumita 2021. A phylogenetic analysis of Momordica (Cucurbitaceae) in India based on karyo-morphology, nuclear DNA content and rDNA ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences. Protoplasma. 258(2):347–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacò A, Astuti G, Peruzzi L. 2021. Typification and nomenclature of the names in the Santolina chamaecyparissus species complex (Asteraceae). Taxon. 70(1):189–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greuter W. 2008. Santolina L. In: Greuter W, von Raab-Straube E, editors. Med-checklist: a critical inventory of vascular plants of the circum-mediterranean countries. Geneva, Switzerland: Organization for the Phyto Taxonomic Investigation of the Mediterranean Area (OPTIMA). p. 696–698.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra M. 2012. Cytotaxonomy: the end of childhood. Pl Biosystems. 146:703–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyohs D. 1982. Miscellaneous chromosome numbers in Asteraceae. Madroño. 29(1):62.
   Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga KARL, Sandberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52(2):201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin D. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky GA. 1931. The karyotype in systematics. Bull Appl Bot Genet Pl Breed. 27:220–240.
   Google Scholar
• Lim KY, Soltis DES, Pamela S, Tate J, Matyasek R, Srubarova H, Kovarik A, Pires JC, Xiong Z, Leitch AR. 2008. Rapid chromosome evolution in recently formed polyploids in Tragopogon (Asteraceae). PLoS One. 3(10):e3353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchi P, Capineri R, D’Amato G. 1979. Il cariotipo di Santolina corsica Jord. & Fourr. (Compositae) proveniente da Bastia (Corsica) ed altre osservazioni. Ann Bot (Rome). 38:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Marchi P, D’Amato G. 1973. Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 145. Inform Bot Ital. 5(150):93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos N, Burgaz AR. 1990. Santolina virens Miller (= S. viridis Willd.): a plant belonging to the Spanish flora. Anales Jard Bot Madrid. 47:513–516.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi FD, Pustahija F, Andreucci A, Ciccarelli D, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Peruzzi L. 2018. Does Solidago litoralis (Asteraceae) merit specific rank? Insights from cytogenetic, molecular and ecological data. Phytotaxa. 346(2):121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberprieler C, Himmelreich S, Vogt R. 2007. A new subtribal classification of the tribe Anthemideae (Compositae). Willdenowia. 37(1):89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Paszko B. 2006. A critical review and a new proposal of karyotype asymmetry indices. Plant Syst Evol. 258(1–2):39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pau DC. 1907. Formas nuevas de plantas. Bol Soc Aragonesa Ci Nat. 6:23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Altınordu F. 2014. A proposal for a multivariate quantitative approach to infer karyological relationships among taxa. Comp Cytogenet. 8(4):337–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Eroğlu HE. 2013. Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comp Cytogenet. 7(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Leitch IJ, Caparelli KF. 2009. Chromosome diversity and evolution in Liliaceae. Ann Bot. 103(3):459–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer JA, Shan F, Galwey N, Yan G, Plummer JA, Galwey N. 2003. New methods for comparison of chromosomes within and between species. Caryologia. 56(2):227–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero-Guerra AO. 2008a. Cytogenetics, biogeography and biology of Santolina ageratifolia Barnades ex Asso (Asteraceae: Anthemideae). Bot J Linn Soc. 157(4):797–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero-Guerra AO. 2008b. Cytogenetics, geographical distribution, and pollen fertility of diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Santolina pectinata Lag. (Asteraceae: Anthemideae). Botan J Linn Soc. 156(4):657–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero-Guerra AO. 2010. Cytogenetics, geographical distribution, pollen stainability and fecundity of Santolina impressa (Asteraceae: Anthemideae). Folia Geobot. 45(1):95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins GI. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés-Bermejo E, Antúnez C. 1981. Estudios caríológicos en especies españolas del género "Santolina" L. ("Compositae"). An Jard Bot Madr. 38:127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Varaldo L, Casazza G, Guerrina M, Baumel A, Giacò A, Peruzzi L, Carballal R, Sáez L, Domina G, Minuto L. 2021. Prime osservazioni sulla filogenesi e la biogeografia del genere Santolina, con particolare riferimento all’aggregato di S. chamaecyparissus. Notiz Soc Bot Ital. 5 (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Liu H, Gao A, Yang X, Liu W, Li X, Li L. 2012. Intergenomic rearrangements after polyploidization of Kengyilia thoroldiana (poaceae: Triticeae) affected by environmental factors. PLoS One. 7(2):e31033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss H, Maluszynska J. 2000. Chromosomal rearrangement in autotetraploid plants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Hereditas. 133(3):255–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar