Ethical Advice to Policy in its Problematic Context: Expertise and Trust

References

• Carson, L. and Martin, B (2002) Random Selection of Citizens for Technological decision making, Science and Public Policy, 29: 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, R. (foreword), Tonkiss, F. (ed), Passey, A. (ed), Fenton, N. (ed) and Hems, L. C. (ed) (2000) Trust and Civil Society, Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Dienel, P. and Renn, O (1995) Planning cells: A gate to fractal mediation. In Renn, O, Webler, and Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Boston: Klewer Academic, pp. 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (1991–2004) Eurobarometer. Brussels: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (2002) Europeans and Radioactive Waste. Eurobarometer 56.2. Brussels: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Durant, J., Wagner, W, Torgerson, H., Einsiedel, E., Jelsoe, E., Fredrickson, H., Lassen, J., Rusanen, T., Boy, D., de Cheveigne, S., Hampel, J., Stathopoulou, A., Allansdottir, A., Midden, C., Nielsen, T., Przestalski, A., Twardowski, T., Fjaestad, B., Olsson, S., Olofsson, A., Bauer, M., and Liakopoulos, M. (1997) Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature, 387: 845–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GMNation, 2003. The UK National GM Dialogue [www.gmsciencedebate.uk.org; www.gmpublicdebate.uk.org].
   Google Scholar
• Irwin A., Dale, A and Smith, D. (1996) Science and Hell's Kitchen: The Local Understanding of Hazard Issues, in A. Irwin and B. Wynne, ed (1996) Misunderstanding Science: The Public reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press (forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B.B. (2003) Further Notes on Public Response to Uncertainty in Risks and Science, Risk Analysis, 23: 741–789.
   Google Scholar
• Laski, H. (1930) The Limitations of the Expert. Harper's Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, H., Malmfors, T. 1994. Comprehending radiation risks In: Radiation and Society: Comprehending Radiation Risk, Proc. Int. Conf. (Vol. 1) IAEA: Vienna, 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. (2000) “Behind the Scenes of Scientific debating”, Social Epistemology, 14: 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Nature, 2003. Dealing with Democracy (editorial), 425: 329
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1992) Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions, 3rd edition. Sage: London.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1995) Selling Science, W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A.P., Lassen, J., Sandoe, P. (in press) Involving the public: Participatory methods and democratic ideals. Global Bioethics (This issue).
   Google Scholar
• Oughton, D.H., Bay, I., Forsberg, E-M, Kaiser, M., Howard, B. 2004. An ethical dimension to sustainable resoration and long-term management of contaminated areas, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 74: 171–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oughton, D.H. (2004) The promises and pitfalls of participation procedures. Global Bioethics, 17: 181–189
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2000. Framework for Integrating Socio-economic Analysis in Chemical Risk management Decision Making, OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications, Series on Risk Management, No. 13. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1993) Perceived Risk, Trust and Nuclear Waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain, in Dunlap, R.E., Kraft, M.E. and Rosa, E.U (eds) Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens Views of Repository Sitings, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G. (2003) “Recovery in the Acid Rain Story: Transparency and Credibility in Science-Based Environmental Regulation”, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5: 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E.M. (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, L.M. (2000) Nuclear Waste: Exploring the Ethical Dilemmas, United Church Publishing House: Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1987) Risk Management and Hazardous Wastes: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility, Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1996) “Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science”, A. Irwin and B. Wynne. (1996) Misunderstanding Science: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide; in (S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, B. Wynne, eds.) Risk, Environment and Modernity, Sage: London, pp44–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. Rules of the game of doing science (Millennium Essay) Nature 400,721.
   Google Scholar