Providing monetary and non-monetary goods to research participants: perspectives and practices of researchers and Research Ethics Committees in Zambia

References

• AAPOR. (2016). The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Survey Outcome Rate Calculator 4.0. (Version 4.0).
   Google Scholar
• Beckford, L., & Broome, M. R. (2007). Ethics and the payment of research subjects. Psychiatry, 6(2), 83–85. doi: 10.1016/j.mppsy.2006.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Boutin-Foster, C., Scott, E., Melendez, J., Rodriguez, A., Ramos, R., Kanna, B., & Michelen, W. (2013). Ethical considerations for conducting health disparities research in community health centers: A social-ecological perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), 2179–2184. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burhansstipano, L., Christopher, S., & Schumacher, S. A. (2005). Lessons learned from community-based participatory research in Indian country. Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 12(Suppl. 2), 70–76. doi: 10.1177/1073274805012004S10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Council for International, & Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2016). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, & National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (2014). The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The Journal of the American College of Dentists, 81(3), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dickert, N., Emanuel, E., & Grady, C. (2002). Paying research subjects: An analysis of current policies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(5), 368–373. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickert, N., & Grady, C. (1999). What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(3), 198–203. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907153410312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eissenberg, T., Panicker, S., Berenbaum, S., Epley, N., Fendrich, M., Kelso, R., … Simmerling, M. (2006). IRBs and psychological science: Ensuring a collaborative relationship. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=899605
   Google Scholar
• Ellenberg, J. H. (1994). Selection bias in observational and experimental studies. Statistics in Medicine, 13(5-7), 557–567. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J. (2004). Ending concerns about undue inducement. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 32(1), 100–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb00453.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J. (2005). Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts? The American Journal of Bioethics, 5(5), 9–13. discussion W8–W11, W17. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., Currie, X. E., Herman, A., & on behalf of Project Phidisa (2005). Undue inducement in clinical research in developing countries: Is it a worry? The Lancet, 366(9482), 336–340. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66992-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., Killen, J., & Grady, C. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189(5), 930–937. doi: 10.1086/381709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, C., Ritter, A., Baldwin, S., Bowen, K., Gardiner, P., Holt, T., … Johnston, J. (2005). Paying research participants: A study of current practices in Australia. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 542–547. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002). Bias and causal associations in observational research. The Lancet, 359(9302), 248–252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Kopec, J. A., Cibere, J., Li, L. C., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2016). Population survey features and response rates: A randomized experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 106(8), 1422–1426. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardigan, P. C., Succar, C. T., & Fleisher, J. M. (2012). An analysis of response rate and economic costs between mail and web-based surveys among practicing dentists: A randomized trial. Journal of Community Health, 37(2), 383–394. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9455-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyder, A. A., Rattani, A., Krubiner, C., Bachan, A. M., & Tran, N. T. (2014). Ethical review of health systems research in low- and middle-income countries: A conceptual exploration | Bioethics.net. Retrieved from http://www.bioethics.net/articles/ethical-review-of-health-systems-research-in-low-and-middle-income-countries-a-conceptual-exploration/
   Google Scholar
• Kimberly, M. B., Hoehn, K. S., Feudtner, C., Nelson, R. M., & Schreiner, M. (2006). Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: A comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials. Pediatrics, 117(5), 1706–1711. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latterman, J., & Merz, J. F. (2001). How much are subjects paid to participate in research? American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 45–46. doi: 10.1162/152651601300169040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macklin, R. (1981). ‘Due’ and ‘undue’ inducements: On pasing money to research subjects. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 3(5), 1–6. doi: 10.2307/3564136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGee. (1997). Subject to payment (A proposed formula for paying research subjects). Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/5656767/Subject_to_Payment_A_proposed_formula_for_paying_research_subjects_
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, S., Mulupi, S., Mbaabu, L., & Marsh, V. (2012). Benefits and payments for research participants: Experiences and views from a research centre on the Kenyan coast. BMC Medical Ethics, 13, 13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwinga, A., & Moodley, K. (2015). Engaging with Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Lusaka Zambia: Perspectives from the research team and CAB members. BMC Medical Ethics, 16(1), 39. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0031-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Njue, M., Kombe, F., Mwalukore, S., Molyneux, S., & Marsh, V. (2014). What are fair study benefits in international health research? Consulting community members in Kenya. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njue, M., Molyneux, S., Kombe, F., Mwalukore, S., Kamuya, D., & Marsh, V. (2015). Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan coast. PLoS ONE, 10(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, T. (2011). Exploitation in payments to research subjects. Bioethics, 25(4), 209–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01717.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, T. B. (2011). A living wage for research subjects. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(2), 243–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00593.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, B. D., Crawford, S., Couper, M., Cave, C., & Haefner, H. K. (2004). Pain at the vulvar vestibule: A web-based survey. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 8(1), 48–57. doi: 10.1097/00128360-200401000-00011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ripley, E. B. (2006). A review of paying research participants: It’s time to move beyond the ethical debate. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(4), 9–19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.4.9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, E., Macrina, F., Markowitz, M., & Gennings, C. (2010). Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 43–56. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409–432. doi: 10.1023/A:1024232915870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, J. M. (2001). The payment of research subjects: Ethical concerns. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28(4), 657–663.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software (Version Release 12). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, M., & Moore, A. (1997). Inducement in research. Bioethics, 11(5), 373–389. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. C., & Bernstein, M. (2011). Payment of research subjects for more than minimal risk trials is unethical. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 342(4), 294–296. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318227e0a1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2015). Poverty | Data. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/topic/poverty
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2017). World Bank Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk. Retrieved from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki. Retrieved from http://www.wma.net/en/20activities/10ethics/10helsinki/
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. (2013, October 19). Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/
   Google Scholar
• Zulu, J. M., Lisulo, M. M., Besa, E., Kaonga, P., Chisenga, C. C., Chomba, M., … Kelly, P. (2014). Improving validity of informed consent for biomedical research in Zambia using a laboratory exposure intervention. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e108305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar