Promoting academic literacy skills among seven graders in Arabic as L1 in Israel (El fomento del lenguaje académico de los estudiantes de lengua árabe en el primer curso de secundaria en Israel)

References / Referencias

• Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. S. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 16, 423–442.
   Google Scholar
• Al Ghanem, R., & Kearns, D. M. (2015). Orthographic, phonological, and morphological skills and children’s’ word reading in Arabic: A literature review. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 83–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman, L., & Homey M. A. (2007). Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayari, S. (1996). Diglossia and illiteracy in the Arab world 1. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 9, 243–253.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, S. (2001). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 44–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72, 101–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, B., & Peyton, J. K. (1990). A new writing environment and an old culture: A situated evaluation of computer networking to teach writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 171–191.
   Google Scholar
• Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., … White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A., Nation, P., Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). The specialised vocabulary of English for academic purposes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 252–267). Cambridge: Cambridge Applied Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Witte, K., & Rogge, N. (2014). Does ICT matter for effectiveness and efficiency in mathematics education? Computers & Education, 75, 173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. WORD, 15, 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 467–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, B., Menkhoff, T., & Smith, R. (2015). Enhancing students’ learning process through interactive digital media: New opportunities for collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 652–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee‐Moore, M. E., & Smith, L. L. (1996). Interactive computer software: The effects on young children’s reading achievement. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 17, 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (2014). A review of the effects of computer-based reading programs on middle school students (Graduate Research Papers. 174). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/174
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, R. (2009). The cognitive basis of diglossia in Arabic: Evidence from a repetition priming study within and between languages. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2, 93–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Is literary Arabic a second language for native Arab speakers?: Evidence from semantic priming study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 51–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israeli Ministry of Education. (2013). Arabic Language Curriculum for Arab and Druze Education (7th – 12th grades). Jerusalem: Pedagogical Secretary Language Department.
   Google Scholar
• Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Froud, K. (2007). Lexical processing in two language varieties: Anevent-related brain potential study of Arabic native speakers. In M. Mughazy (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XX (pp. 153–168). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Woodruff, A. L., Klein Reutebuch, C., & Kouzekanani, K. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 6–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D., Lee, S., & Lao, C. (2018). Comprehensible and compelling: The causes and effects of free voluntary reading. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, F., Kujala, J., Richardson, U., Lyytinen, H., & Goswami, U. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of two theoretically motivated computer‐assisted reading interventions in the United Kingdom: GG Rime and GG Phoneme. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. F., Capotosto, L., Branum-Martin, L., White, C., & Snow, C. E. (2012). Language proficiency, home-language status, and English vocabulary development: A longitudinal follow-up of the Word Generation program. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 437–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Crosson, A. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Pierce, M. (2010). Uneven profiles: Language minority learners’ word reading, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, L., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (2000). Computer‐assisted reading intervention in a secondary school: An evaluation study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Ferretti, R. P., Okolo, C. M., & Cavalier, A. R. (2001). Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 273–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhoul, B., Kamis-Dakwar, R., & Copti-Mshael, Th. (2015). The development of sociolinguistic diglossic knowledge in oral-literacy mismatch situations: Preliminary findings from Palestinians Arabs. Psychology, 6, 1168–1179.
   Google Scholar
• Makhoul, B., Olshtain, E., & Ibrahim, R. (2015). Let’s read together”: A balanced computer assisted intervention program and its effect on comprehension amongst at linguistic risk Arab first graders. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 5, 626–645.
   Google Scholar
• Makhoul, B., Olshtain, E., Sabah, K., & Copti-Mshael, T. (2018). The development of academic vocabulary among Arabic-native-speaking middle school pupils: How much do they really know? Psychology, 9, 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• Mathes, P. G., Torgesen, J. K., & Allor, J. H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 371–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2005). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. In D. H. Rose, A. Meyer & C. Hitchcock (Eds.), The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies (pp. 13-35). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mo, D., Zhang, L., Luo, R., Qu, Q., Huang, W., Wang, J., … Rozelle, S. (2014). Integrating computer-assisted learning into a regular curriculum: Evidence from a randomised experiment in rural schools in Shaanxi. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 6, 300–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-enhanced Learning, 2(2), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. International association for the evaluation of educational achievement. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., Herman, P., & Anderson, R. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume 1, Revised edition, February 2014): Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behavior, confidence. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Indicator B1 how much is spent per student? In Education at glance 2016: OECD indicators (pp. 180–197). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, R. K., & Wise, B. W. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Reading and Writing, 4, 107–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potocki, A., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Effects of computer-assisted comprehension training in less skilled comprehenders in second grade: A one-year follow-up study. Computers & Education, 63, 131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potocki, A., Magnan, A., & Ecalle, J. (2015). Computerized trainings in four groups of struggling readers: Specific effects on word reading and comprehension. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAMA. (2016). MEITZAV—Measurements of school efficiency and growth—General background. Retrieved from: http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Rama/Meitzav/DochotMaarachtim.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., & Schreiner, R. (1985). The effects of computer-mediated text on measures of reading comprehension and reading behavior. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 536–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Grimley, M. (1999). Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi‐media materials in 11‐year‐old children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. S. (2002). Reading in a digital age. In G. E. Gorman (Ed.), The digital factor in library and information services (pp. 91–111). London: Facet publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, S. F., & Beck, I. L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 197–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (FL) readers. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 717–736.
   Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18, 559–582.
   Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 605–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Joshi, M. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M. K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Predicting word-level reading fluency outcomes in three contrastive groups: Remedial and computer-assisted remedial reading intervention, and mainstream instruction. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 402–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M. K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer‐assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82, 1013–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, R. S., Abrami, P., Hipps, G., & Deault, L. (2009). A randomized controlled trial study of the ABRACADABRA reading intervention program in grade 1. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 590–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the bahviour of two versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88. 10.1177/026553220101800103
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, L. C., Styers, M. K., Wilkerson, S. B., & Peery, E. (2015). Computer-assisted learning in elementary reading: A randomized control trial. Computers in the Schools, 32, 20–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibold, C. (2011). Building English language learners’ academic vocabulary: Strategies and Tips. Multicultural Education, 18(2), 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best‐evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 290–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetter, M. E., & Hughes, M. T. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to enhance the reading comprehension of struggling readers: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (1998). Interactive computer support for improving phonological skills. In J. L. Metsala, & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 189–208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. L., Mustian, A. L., & Cooke, N. L. (2012). Comparing whole-word and morphograph instruction during computer-assisted peer tutoring on students’ acquisition and generalization of vocabulary. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Županec, V., Miljanović, T., & Pribićević, T. (2013). Effectiveness of computer-assisted learning in biology teaching in primary schools in Serbia. Zbornik Instituta Za Pedagoska Istrazivanja, 45, 422–444.
   Google Scholar