‘Step-by-step’ method to conduct applied research in organizational engineering and business management (Método ‘paso a paso’ para la investigación aplicada en el ámbito de la ingeniería organizacional y la gestión empresarial)

References / Referencias

• Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., & Muslin, I. S. (2009). First decade of organizational research methods: Trends in design, measurement, and data-analysis topics. Organizational Research Methods, 12(1), 69–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108322641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., & Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives ( Abridged E). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Angrosino, M. (2008). Doing ethnographic and observational research. In J. Corbin, N. K. Denzin, P. Freebody, K. Gergen, J. Mason, M. Murray, C. Seale, J. Potter, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), The SAGE qualitative research kit (1st ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208932
   Google Scholar
• Ates, O. (2012). Impact of case study method on an ESP business course. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(6), 135–140. http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_6_Special_Issue_March_2012/17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. In D. A. Kenny, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2019.1610343
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G.-Z. (2016). Global trends and research aims for English academic oral presentations: Changes, challenges, and opportunities for learning technology. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerra-Fernandez, I., Wang, T., Agha, G., & Sin, T. (2005). Actor model and knowledge management systems: Social interaction as a framework for knowledge integration. In K.-D. Althoff, A. Dengel, R. Bergmann, M. Nick, & T. Roth-Berghofer (Eds.), Professional knowledge management, Third Biennial Conference,WM2005 (Vol. 3782, pp. 19–31). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/978-3-540-30465-4
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, C. A. (2010). Metodología de la investigación administración, economía, humanidades y ciencias sociales ( L. E. Cruz Buelvas, M. de los Á. Briceño Moreno, M. García Bencomo, & C. I. Jaramillo Gaviria, Eds.) (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classificationof educational goals. In B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, & D. R. Krathwohl (Eds.), Handbook 1 cognitive domain. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briller, S. H., Meert, K. L., Schim, S. M., Thurston, C. S., & Kabel, A. (2008). Implementing a triangulation protocol in bereavement research: A methodological discussion. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 57(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.57.3.b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2005). Research methods and organizational studies ( M. Bulmer, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows, A guide for social scientists. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buhmann, K., Fasterling, B., & Voiculescu, A. (2018, October 2). Business & human rights research methods. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 36(4), 323–332. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2018.1547522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. A. (2014). La ciencia. su método y su filosofía. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial Argentina, Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Calderon-Valencia, F., & Escobar-Sierra, M. (2020). Defensores Ambientales en Colombia y Razonamiento Abductivo en el Acceso a la Justicia. Veredas Do Direito: Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 17(38), 69–112. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v17i38.1678
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavaye, A. L. M. (1996). Case study research: A multi-faceted research approach for IS. Information Systems Journal, 6(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.1996.tb00015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Jiang, B. C., & Hsu, K. (2005). An empirical study of industrial engineering and management curriculum reform in fostering students’ creativity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790500087423
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, S. (1996). The case study method for research in small-and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 15(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242696151005
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. L. (1951). Ancient rhetoric and English renaissance literature. Shakespeare Quarterly, 2(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2866651
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research ( P. A. Smith, Ed.) (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory ( M. Baird, M. Staudt, M. Stranz, & L. Stefano, Eds.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, C., Forrester, M., Gibson, S., Gordon-Finlayson, A., Hugh-Jones, S., King, N., Shaw, R., Sullivan, C., Riley, S., & Wiggins, S. (2010). Doing qualitative research in psychology: A practical guide ( M. Forrester, Ed.) (1st ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field (Vol. 6, 1st ed.). Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 1). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development theory and applications. 26 applied social research methods series (4th ed.). Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., Li, S., & Bartunek, J. (2009). Research methods for organizational learning: The transatlantic gap. Management Learning, 40(4), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609339682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Sierra, M. (2015). Análisis de la gestión de la innovación vinculada con la responsabilidad social desde las dimensiones motivación y conocimiento: Un estudio de caso. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/51034/
   Google Scholar
• Feak, C. B. (2012). ESP and speaking. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 35–53). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Fiegen, A. M. (2010). Systematic review of research methods: The case of business instruction. Reference Services Review, 38(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321011070883
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. In J. Corbin, N. K. Denzin, P. Freebody, K. Gergen, J. Mason, M. Murray, C. Seale, J. Potter, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), The Sage qualitative research kit (1st ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209441
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U., Von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (Eds.). (2004). A Companion to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. (1999). Paradigms and research methods. In Research Methods Forum (Vol. 4, pp. 1–8). Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffari, S., & Talebbeydokhti, N. (2013). Status of environmental engineering education in various countries in comparison with the situation in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(Ifee2012), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.776
   Google Scholar
• Gilstrap, D. L. (2009). Collective case study method and fractal geometry: Instrumental and intrinsic cases in organizational research. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 11(4), 1–14. https://soar.wichita.edu/handle/10057/6634
   Google Scholar
• Giudici, P. (2003). Applied data mining: Statistical methods for business and industry. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2006.s135
   Google Scholar
• González Rey, F. (2006). Investigación cualitativa y subjetividad ( G. de Villa S. J. & N. E. Rodenas, Eds.). Oficina de derechos humanos del arzobispado de Guatemala.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (Ed.). (2011). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Halcomb, E. J., & Andrew, S. (2005). Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 13(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.13.2.71.s8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2013). What is qualitative research? Research methods series (1st ed.). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación ( N. I. Lopez, Ed.) (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: An approach to theory building. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 522–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113484969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Joedodibroto, R. (1991). Some experiences in training engineering students for a better information seeking methodology. European Journal of Engineering Education, 16(3), 261–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799108939529
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2016). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Research methodology in strategic management: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108319843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltai, K., Ho, N. T., Masequesmay, G., Niedober, D. J., Skoog, M., Johnson, W., … Lyons, J. B. (2014). An extended case study methodology for investigating influence of cultural, organizational, and automation factors on human-automation trust. In K. Koltai, N. Ho, G. Masequesmay, D. Niedober, M. Skoog, W. Johnson, A. Cacanindin, & J. Lyons (Eds.), Conference on human factors in computing systems - proceedings (pp. 885–888). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559974
   Google Scholar
• Kouritzin, S. G., Piquemal, N. A. C., & Norman, R. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative research: Challenging the orthodoxies in standard academic discourse(s). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203886823
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2007). Netnography 2.0. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 129–143). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. In J. Corbin, N. K. Denzin, P. Freebody, K. Gergen, J. Mason, M. Murray, C. Seale, J. Potter, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), The SAGE qualitative research kit (1st ed.). Sage Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualtative studies of strategy and management. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 6(2011), 201–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-8387(2011)0000006007
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research ( P. E. Nathan, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., & Wathen, S. A. (2012). Statistical techniques in business & economics (15th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, F. Y., Rey-Martí, A., & Botella-Carrubi, D. (2020). Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 115, 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, M., & Pietarinen, A.-V. (2016). A dynamic approach to Peirce’s interrogative construal of abductive logic. IFCoLog Journal of Logic and Its Applications, 3(3), 73–104. http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00005.pdf#page=83
   Google Scholar
• Mariotto, F. L., Pinto Zanni, P., & Salati Marcondes de Moraes, G. H. (2014). What is the use of a single-case study in management research? Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54(4), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020140402
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. F. (2012, August 1). How to choose a statistical test. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 114(8), 865–868. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201200260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marusteri, M., & Bacarea, V. (2010). Comparing groups for statistical differences: How to choose the right statistical test? Biochemia Medica, 20(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, R. N., Salim, S. S., & Ahmad, R. (2014). Analysis and classification of problems associated with requirements engineering education: Towards an integrated view. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39(3), 1923–1935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0901-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, M. (1996). Argument structure. In Business research through argument (pp. 71–89). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2291-1_4
   Google Scholar
• Michailova, S., & Liuhto, K. (2000). Organization and management research in transition economies: Towards improved research methodologies. Journal of East-West Business, 6(3), 7–46. https://doi.org/10.1300/J097v06n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis ( R. Holland, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2016). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (11th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. J., & Cody, W. K. (1993). The role of theory in qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 6(4), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/089431849300600405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perren, L., & Ram, M. (2004). Case study method in small business and entrepreneurial research: Mapping boundaries and perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 22(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604039482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1987). Research methodology in organizational studies. Journal of Management, 13(2), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzebon, M. (2004). Conducting and evaluating critical interpretive research: Examining criteria as a key component in building a research tradition. In B. Kaplan, D. P. Truex, I. I., D. Wastell, A. T. Wood-Harper, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems research (pp. 275–292). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_16
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691986242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. The University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2015). Rigorous data analysis: Beyond “anything goes”. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Practice of research method. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-998-2
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research ( N. Beretvas & P. Leavy, Eds.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. N. K., & Bezzina, F. (2015). Reflections on conceptions of research methodology among management academics. European Management Journal, 33(5), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., & Nail-Chiwetalu, B. (2006). Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: The application of traditional and comprehensive pearl growing. A review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820600742190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, D. P. (2013). Research methods for organizational studies ( A. Duffy & K. Duch, Eds.) (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611284
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory. Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, S., & Singh, R. (2014). Demystifying statistics: How to choose a statistical test? Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 9(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injr.2014.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, J. K. (2012). Computer-oriented statistical methods in business, as per the BBA course syllabus (1st ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., & Dow, S. (2019). International business education at the interface: The raw case study method. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 30(3), 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2019.1698392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Doing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide ( V. Knight, Ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research, studying how things work. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stapa, M., Murad, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2014). Engineering technical oral presentation: Voices of the stakeholder. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118(118), 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.063
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, A. H., Flikkema, R., & Toledo-Pereyra, L. H. (2011). Developing the research hypothesis. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 24(5), 191–194. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2011.609449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas Sabadías, A. (1995). Estadística descriptiva e inferencial. Colección Ciencia y tecnica. Univ de Castilla La Mancha.
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, C. E., Caress, A. L., Chew-Graham, C., & Todd, C. J. (2004). Case studies: A research strategy appropriate for palliative care? Palliative Medicine, 18(8), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216304pm962ra
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literaturerReview. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.1.1.104.6570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857029034
   Google Scholar
• Willimack, D. K. (2013). Methods for the development, testing, and evaluation of data collection instruments. In Designing and conducting business surveys (1st ed., pp. 253–301). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118447895.ch07
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (2003). Mejorar la escritura de la investigacion cualitativa ( Primera en). Editorial Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Enfermeria de la Universidad de Antioquia.
   Google Scholar
• Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. H. (Eds.). (2009). Organizational ethnography studying the complexity of everyday life (1st ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M., Edwards, G., Davis, J., Burger, K., & Terry, A. (2013). Integrating problem solving and research methods teaching for systems practice in engineering. In Procedia computer science (Vol. 16, pp. 1072–1081). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.113
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. In V. Knight (Ed.), Applied social research methods series (3rd ed., Vol. 5). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar