Learning through reading and writing tasks in higher education: what do students use, paper or screen? (El aprendizaje a través de la lectura y la escritura en la educación universitaria: ¿qué usan los estudiantes, papel o pantalla?)

References / Referencias

• Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2018). Students’ academic reading preferences: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616656044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge. Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ayala, S. A. (2019). Reading and search practices in Rosario, Argentina: A case study of usage practices of digital and paper devices by students and professors in higher education. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 16(1), 174–196. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Soledad-Ayala/publication/333433625
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Yehudah, G., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2014). The influence of text annotation tools on print and digital reading comprehension. In Y. Eshet-Alkalay, A. Caspi, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, V. Silber-Varod, & Y. Yair (Eds.), Learning in the technological era: Proceedings of the 9th CHAIS conference for innovation in learning technologies (pp. 28–35). Open University and Shoham.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Yehudah, G., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2018). The contribution of text-highlighting to comprehension: A comparison of print and digital reading. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 27(2), 153–178. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/174353/
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, M., Morgan, T., Belfer, K., & Qayyum, A. (2008, October). The digital learner at BCIT and implications for an e-strategy. 5th Research Workshop of the European Distance Education Network (EDEN), Researching and promoting access to education and training: The role of distance education and e-learning in technology enhanced environments, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital learners in higher education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage Et de La Technologie, 37(1), 1–24. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42755/
   Google Scholar
• Castells, N., Minguela, M., Nadal, E., Solé, I., Miras, M., & Cuevas, I. (in press). La lectura y la escritura para aprender en la Universidad: Representaciones de estudiantes y docentes de distintas disciplinas. [Reading and writing to learn at the University: Students’ and professors’ views in different disciplines]. In M. Castelló, & N. Castells (Eds.), Escribir en la Universidad Española: Entre la realidad y el deseo. Octaedro.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, M., Simpson, A., & Graham, S. (2013). Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9386-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. L. (2008). First year students‘ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500095689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., & Jones, S. (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003664021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, M., Solé, I., Martín, E., Castells, N., Cuevas, I., & González-Lamas, J. (2016). Perfiles de creencias epistemológicas y acerca de la lectura, y su papel en la comprensión de múltiples textos. [Epistemological and reading beliefs profiles and their role in multiple text comprehension]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(2), 226–252. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.39.15058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, M., Villalón, R., de Dios, M. J., & Martín, E. (2007). Reading and writing tasks on different university degree courses: What do the students say they do? Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 489–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ academic reading format preferences and behaviors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, W., & Ebner, M. (2009). Is your university ready for the Ne(x)t-Generation? In C. Fulford, & G. Siemens (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia & telecommunications (pp. 4344–4351). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. (2008). The reading-writing nexus in discourse research. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing (pp. 435–450). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
   Google Scholar
• Petrová, Z., & Nemec, R. (2019). Changing reading paths in a digital age: What are the consequences for meaning-making? Journal of Pedagogy, 10(2), 65–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2019-0007
   Google Scholar
• Sevillano-García, M. L., Quicios-García, M. P., & González-García, J. L. (2016). Posibilidades ubicuas del ordenador portátil: Percepción de estudiantes universitarios españoles. [Ubiquitous possibilities of the laptop: Spanish university students’ perception]. Comunicar, 24(46), 87–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3916/C46-2016-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2017). The surprising persistence of Biglan’s classification scheme. Studies in Higher Education, 42( 8), 1520–1531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1111323
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (2000). An update on strategic learning: It’s more than textbook reading strategies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(6), 528–541. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40000858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P. (2001). Writing, learning and the development of expertise in higher education. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 37–56). Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. (2016). Tales of literacy for the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar