65
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework

Pages 240-259 | Received 06 Dec 2016, Accepted 01 Mar 2018, Published online: 07 May 2018

References

  • Amgoud, L. , Ben-Naim, J. , & Vesic, S. (2017). Measuring the intensity of attacks in argumentation graphs with shapley value . International joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 63–69).
  • Benferhat, S. , & Garcia, L. (1998). A local handling of inconsistent knowledge and default bases. In Applications of uncertainty formalisms (pp. 325–353).
  • Besnard, P. (2014). Revisiting postulates for inconsistency measures. In JELIA (pp. 383–396).
  • Besnard, P. , Grégoire, É. , Piette, C. , & Raddaoui, B. (2010). Mus-based generation of arguments and counter-arguments . In IRI (pp. 239–244).
  • Besnard, P. , Grégoire, É. , & Raddaoui, B. (2012). An argumentation framework for reasoning about bounded resources. In ICTAI (pp. 540–-547).
  • Besnard, P. , Grégoire, É. , & Raddaoui, B. (2013). A conditional logic-based argumentation framework. In SUM (pp. 44–56).
  • Besnard, P. & Hunter, A. (2001). A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence , 128 (1–2), 203–235.
  • Bertossi, L. E. , Hunter, A. , & Schaub, T. (2005). Introduction to inconsistency tolerance. In Inconsistency tolerance (pp. 1–14).
  • Besnard, P. , & Hunter, A. (2005). Practical first-order argumentation. In AAAI (pp. 590–595).
  • Black, E. , Hunter, A. , & Pan, J. Z. (2009). An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies. In SUM (pp. 68–79).
  • Chen, Q. , Zhang, C. , & Zhang, S. (2004). A verification model for electronic transaction protocols. In APWeb (pp. 824–833).
  • Condotta, J. , Raddaoui, B. , & Salhi, Y. (2016). Quantifying conflicts for spatial and temporal information. International conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (pp. 443–452).
  • Doder, D. , Raskovic, M. , Markovic, Z. , & Ognjanovic, Z. (2010). Measures of inconsistency and defaults. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 51 (7), 832–845.
  • Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence , 77 (2), 321–358.
  • Grant, J. (1978). Classifications for inconsistent theories. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic , 19 (3), 435–444.
  • Grant, J. & Hunter, A. (2006). Measuring inconsistency in knowledgebases. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems , 27 (2), 159–184.
  • Grant, J. & Hunter, A. (2008). Analysing inconsistent first-order knowledgebases. Artificial Intelligence , 172 (8–9), 1064–1093.
  • Grant, J. , & Hunter, A. (2011). Measuring the good and the bad in inconsistent information. In IJCAI (pp. 2632–2637).
  • Grant, J. , & Hunter, A. (2013). Distance-based measures of inconsistency. In ECSQARU (pp. 230–241).
  • Grant, J. , & Hunter, A. (2015). Using shapley inconsistency values for distributed information systems with uncertainty. In Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty ECSQARU (pp. 235–245).
  • Hunter, A. (2002). Measuring inconsistency in knowledge via quasi-classical models. In AAAI/IAAI (pp. 68–73).
  • Hunter, A. (2004). Logical comparison of inconsistent perspectives using scoring functions. Knowledge and Information Systems , 6 (5), 528–543.
  • Hunter, A. (2006). How to act on inconsistent news: Ignore, resolve, or reject. Data & Knowledge Engineering , 57 (3), 221–239.
  • Hunter, A. , & Konieczny, S. (2006). Shapley inconsistency values. In KR (pp. 249–259).
  • Hunter, A. , & Konieczny, S. (2008). Measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets. In KR (pp. 358–366).
  • Hunter, A. & Konieczny, S. (2010). On the measure of conflicts: Shapley inconsistency values. Artificial Intelligence , 174 (14), 1007–1026.
  • Hunter, A. , Parsons, S. , & Wooldridge, M. (2014). Measuring inconsistency in multi-agent systems. Kunstliche Intelligenz , 28 , 169–178.
  • Jabbour, S. , Ma, Y. , & Raddaoui, B. (2014). Inconsistency measurement thanks to mus decomposition. In AAMAS (pp. 877–884).
  • Jabbour, S. , Ma, Y. , Raddaoui, B. , & Saïs, L. (2014). On the characterization of inconsistency: A prime implicates based framework. In ICTAI (pp. 146–153).
  • Jabbour, S. , Ma, Y. , Raddaoui, B. , & Saïs, L. (2014). Prime implicates based inconsistency characterization. In ECAI (pp. 1037–1038).
  • Jabbour, S. , & Raddaoui, B. (2013). Measuring inconsistency through minimal proofs. In ECSQARU (pp. 290–301).
  • Jabbour, S. , Ma, Y. , Raddaoui, B. , & Sais, L. (2017). Quantifying conflicts in propositional logic through prime implicates. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning , 89 , 27–40.
  • Jabbour, S. , Ma, Y. , Raddaoui, B. , Sais, L. , & Salhi, Y. (2015). On structure-based inconsistency measures and their computations via closed set packing. International conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1749–1750).
  • Jabbour, S. , Ma, Y. , Raddaoui, B. , Sais, L. , & Salhi, Y. (2016). A MIS partition based framework for measuring inconsistency . International conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (pp. 84–93).
  • Knight, K. (2002). Measuring inconsistency. Journal of Philosophical Logic , 31 (1), 77–98.
  • Liffiton, M. H. & Sakallah, K. A. (2008). Algorithms for computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets of constraints. Journal of Automated Reasoning , 40 (1), 1–33.
  • Martinez, A. B. B. , Arias, J. J. P. , & Vilas, A. F. (2004). On measuring levels of inconsistency in multi-perspective requirements specifications. In PRISE’04 (pp. 21–30).
  • Mu, K. , Liu, W. , & Jin, Z. (2011). A general framework for measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets. Knowledge and Information Systems , 27 (1), 85–114.
  • Mu, K. , Liu, W. , & Jin, Z. (2012). Measuring the blame of each formula for inconsistent prioritized knowledge bases. Journal of Logic and Computation , 22 (3), 481–516.
  • Mu, K. , Liu, W. , Jin, Z. , & Bell, D. A. (2011). A syntax-based approach to measuring the degree of inconsistency for belief bases. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 52 (7), 978–999.
  • Ma, Y. , Qi, G. , & Hitzler, P. (2011). Computing inconsistency measure based on paraconsistent semantics. Journal of Logic and Computation , 21 (6), 1257–1281.
  • Ma, Y. , Qi, G. , Xiao, G. , Hitzler, P. , & Lin, Z. (2010). Computational complexity and anytime algorithm for inconsistency measurement. International Journal of Software and Informatics , 4 (1), 3–21.
  • Martinez, V. M. , Pugliese, A. , Simari, G. I. , Subrahmanian, V. S. , & Prade, H. (2007). How dirty is your relational database? An axiomatic approach. In ECSQARU (pp. 103–114).
  • McAreavey, K. , Liu, W. , & Miller, P. C. (2014). Computational approaches to finding and measuring inconsistency in arbitrary knowledge bases. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 55 (8), 1659–1693.
  • McAreavey, K. , Liu, W. , Miller, P. , & Mu, K. (2011). Measuring inconsistency in a network intrusion detection rule set based on snort. International Journal of Semantic Computing , 5 (3).
  • Mu, K. (2015). Responsibility for inconsistency. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 61 , 43–60.
  • Oller, C. A. (2004). Measuring coherence using lp-models. Journal of Applied Logic , 2 (4), 451–455.
  • Picado-Muiño, D. (2011). Measuring and repairing inconsistency in probabilistic knowledge bases. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 52 (6), 828–840.
  • Qi, G. , Liu, W. , & Bell, D. A. (2005). Measuring conflict and agreement between two prioritized belief bases. In IJCAI (pp. 552–557).
  • Raddaoui, B. (2013). Contributions aux approches logiques de l’argumentation en intelligence artificielle (PhD thesis). University of Artois.
  • Raddaoui, B. (2015, January 10--12). Computing inconsistency using logical argumentation. In ICAART 2015 -- Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence . Vol. 2 (pp. 164-172). Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Reiter, R. (1987). A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence , 32 (1), 57–95.
  • Rodder, W. , & Xu, L. (2001). Elimination of inconsistent knowledge in the probabilistic expert system-shell SPIRIT (in German). In Operations Research . Springer-Verlag (pp. 260–265).
  • Thimm, M. (2013). Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics. Artificial Intelligence , 197 , 1–24.
  • Thimm, M. (2016). Stream-based inconsistency measurement. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 68 , 68–87.
  • Xiao, G. , Lin, Z. , Ma, Y. , & Qi, G. (2010). Computing inconsistency measurements under multi-valued semantics by partial max-sat solvers. In KR .
  • Xiao, G. , & Ma, Y. (2012). Inconsistency measurement based on variables in minimal unsatisfiable subsets. In ECAI (pp. 864–869).
  • Zhou, L. , Huang, H. , Qi, G. , Ma, Y. , Huang, Z. , & Qu, Y. (2009). Measuring inconsistency in dl-lite ontologies. In Web intelligence (pp. 349–356).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.