Let the people decide? Support for referenda since the New Zealand flag change referendums

References

• Akkerman A, Jacobs K, Zaslove A. 2016 September. The voice of populist people? Referendum preferences, practices and populist attitudes. Paper presented at: The ECPR General Conference in Prague; Czech Republic. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/da7a7e12-cc55-4aa8-92f0-c534dcdc6d43.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Goodyear-Grant E. 2010. Why are highly informed citizens sceptical of referenda? Electoral Studies. 29(2):227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CD, Goodyear-Grant E. 2005. Conceptions of political representation in Canada: An explanation of public opinion. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique. 38(4):1029–1058. doi: 10.1017/S0008423905040254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer MW. 2017. No time for experts? Trust in science after the BREXIT vote of 23 June 2016. In: B. Schiele, J. LeMarec, editor. Cultures de Science. Montreal, Canada: Acfas; p. 91–99. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/78047/.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer PC, Fatke M. 2014. Direct democracy and political trust: enhancing trust, initiating distrust – or both? Swiss Political Science Review. 20(1):49–69. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson Å, Mattila M. 2009. Direct democracy and its critics: support for direct democracy and ‘stealth’ democracy in Finland. West European Politics. 32(5):1031–1048. doi: 10.1080/01402380903065256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer J. 2017 September. A fourth wave of populism? Trajectories of populist radical right parties in Europe, 2000–2017. Paper presented at: The 11th ECPR General Conference; Oslo, Norway. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/afb62469-c7aa-4d52-9328-2a037ac7844b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer J, Vatter A. 2012. Can’t get no satisfaction with the Westminster model? Winners, losers and the effects of consensual and direct democratic institutions on satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Research. 51(4):435–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler S, Donovan T, Karp JA. 2007. Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quarterly. 60(3):351–362. doi: 10.1177/1065912907304108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines EG, Stimson JA. 1980. The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review. 74(1):78–91. doi: 10.2307/1955648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingwood L. 2012. Levels of education and support for direct democracy. American Politics Research. 40(4):571–602. doi: 10.1177/1532673X11428805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton RJ. 2008. Direct democracy and good governance: does it matter? In: S. Bowler, A. Glazer, editors. Direct democracy’s impact on American political institutions. New York City, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton JR, Bürklin W, Drummond A. 2001. Public opinion and direct democracy. Journal of Democracy. 12(4):141–153. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese CH. (Ed.). 2007. The dynamics of referendum campaigns: an international perspective. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• de Vreese CH, Schuck AR. 2014. Political communication in referendums. In: C. Reinemann, editor. Political communication. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter; p. 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• de Vreese CH, Semetko HA. 2002. Cynical and engaged: strategic campaign coverage, public opinion, and mobilization in a referendum. Communication Research. 29(6):615–641. doi: 10.1177/009365002237829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinas E. 2013. Opening “openness to change” political events and the increased sensitivity of young adults. Political Research Quarterly. 66(4):868–882. doi: 10.1177/1065912913475874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan T, Karp JA. 2006. Popular support for direct democracy. Party Politics. 12(5):671–688. doi: 10.1177/1354068806066793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan T, Tolbert CJ, Smith DA. 2009. Political engagement, mobilization, and direct democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly. 73(1):98–118. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatke M. 2014. Allure or alternative? Direct democracy and party identification. Party Politics. 20(2):248–260. doi: 10.1177/1354068813520271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font J, Fernández JL. 2015. Direct democracy and responsiveness: two paths towards enlarging citizens’ voices in democratic politics? Paper presented at: The Conference “Democracy: a citizen perspective”; May; Abo, Finland. http://www.abo.fi/fakultet/media/33801/fontfernandez_directdemocracyandresponsiveness.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ford R, Goodwin MJ. 2010. Angry white men: individual and contextual predictors of support for the British National Party. Political Studies. 58(1):1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forss K, Magro L. 2016. Facts or feelings, facts and Feelings? The post-democracy narrative in the Brexit debate. European Policy Analysis. 2(2):12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin MJ, Heath O. 2016. The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: an aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly. 87(3):323–332. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves LM, Vowles J. in press. Measuring populism in New Zealand. In: J. Vowles, J. Curtin, editor. The populist Exception? The 2017 New Zealand general election. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing JR, Theiss-Morse E. 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskinson J. (Director). 2014 August 16. Predatory churches and televangelism [Television series episode]. In J. Oliver (Executive Producer), Last week tonight. New York City, NY: HBO.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart R, Norris P. 2016 September. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Paper presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Political Science; Philadelphia, PA. https://faculty.uml.edu/sgallagher/Trump_Populism_Norris.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson D, Thorsen E, Wring D, editor. 2016. EU referendum analysis 2016: media, voters and the campaign. http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/24337/1/EU%20Referendum%20Analysis%202016%20-%20Jackson%20Thorsen%20and%20Wring%20v1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karp J, Aimer P. 2002. Direct democracy on trial: the citizens-initiated referendums. In: J. Vowles, P. Aimer, J. Karp, S. Banducci, R. Miller, A. Sullivan, editor. Proportional representation on trial: The 1999 New Zealand general election and the fate of MMP. Auckland, NZ: Auckland University Press; p. 146–159.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc L. 2003. The politics of direct democracy: referendums in global perspective. ON, Canada: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leininger A. 2015a March. Popular support for direct democracy in Europe. Paper presented at: The ECPR Joint Sessions; Warsaw, Poland. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/81025c54-6d96-42eb-99bd-d1c6769be3ac.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leininger A. 2015b. Direct democracy in Europe: potentials and pitfalls. Global Policy. 6(S1):17–27. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12224
   Google Scholar
• Little A. 2016 March 24. Andrew Little: John Key’s flag has cost New Zealand $26 m. The New Zealand Herald. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11611452.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn T, Rosati P, Nair B. 2017 August. Calculated vs. ad hoc publics in the #Brexit discourse on Twitter. Paper presented at: The 2017 Irish Academy of Management Annual Conference, Queen’s University, Belfast, Ireland. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319528530_Calculated_vs_Ad_Hoc_Publics_in_the_Brexit_Discourse_on_Twitter.
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli A. 2017. Beyond Trump: populism on the rise. Chicago, IL: Edizioni Epoké.
   Google Scholar
• Milne BJ. 2015. Who wants to change the flag? Results of a national representative survey. New Zealand Sociology. 30(4):126–153.
   Google Scholar
• Milne BJ. 2016. Methods and procedures for the 2015 International Social Survey Programme (ISSP). https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/arts/research-centres/compass/documents/ISSP2015_methods_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition. 39(4):541–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen T. 2014. The Scottish independence referendum 2014. Journal of Law and Society. 41(4):627–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2014.00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzhistory.govt. 2016. Red peak flag. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/red-peak.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver JE, Rahn WM. 2016. Rise of the Trumpenvolk: populism in the 2016 election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 667(1):189–206. doi: 10.1177/0002716216662639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne D, Sears DO, Valentino NA. 2011. The end of the solidly democratic South: the impressionable-years hypothesis. Political Psychology. 32(1):81–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00796.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels T, Marien S. 2010. Populist voters and direct democracy. The silent majority in search of a voice? Paper presented at: The Politicologenetmaal, Leuven, Belgium. https://soc.kuleuven.be/web/files/11/72/W07-08.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perota J. (Director). 2015 November 2. American legislative exchange council [Television series episode]. In J. Oliver (Executive Producer), Last week tonight. New York City, NY: HBO.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam RD. 2001. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Radio New Zealand. 2014 October 30. Flag to cost $26 million; Prominent New Zealanders to help. http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/20155265/flag-to-cost-26-million,-prominent-new-zealanders-to-help.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts N. 2016. Referendums. Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/referendums.
   Google Scholar
• Satherley N, Yogeeswaran K, Osborne D, Sibley CG. 2018. If they say “yes,” we say “no”: Partisan cues increase polarization overnational symbols. Psychological Science. 29(12):1996–2009. doi: 10.1177/0956797618805420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow SE. 2001. Direct democracy and institutional change: a comparative investigation. Comparative Political Studies. 34(6):651–665. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck AR, De Vreese CH. 2011. Public support for referendums: the role of the media. West European Politics. 34(2):181–207. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.546566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck AR, de Vreese CH. 2015. Public support for referendums in Europe: a cross-national comparison in 21 countries. Electoral Studies. 38:149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetko HA, de Vreese CH. 2004. Political campaigning in referendums: framing the referendum issue. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DA, Tolbert C. 2007. The instrumental and educative effects of ballot measures: research on direct democracy in the American states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 7(4):416–445. doi: 10.1177/153244000700700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towfigh EV, Goerg SJ, Glöckner A, Leifeld P, Llorente-Saguer A, Bade S, Kurschilgen C. 2016. Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation? Public Choice. 167(1-2):47–65. doi: 10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vowles J. 2017. Turnout at the macro-level. In: J. Fisher, E. Fieldhouse, M. N. Franklin, R. Gibson, M. Cantijoch, C. Wiezien, editor. The Routledge handbook of elections, voting behaviour, and public opinion. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak M. 2014. Preferences for political decision-making processes and issue publics. Public Opinion Quarterly. 78(4):917–939. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu I, Milne BJ. 2017. Methods and procedures for the 2016 International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) for New Zealand. https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/arts/research-centres/compass/documents/ISSP2016_methods_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar