4,525
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

‘Forced’ family separation and inter-generational dynamics: multi-generational new Chinese immigrant families in New Zealand

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 148-167 | Received 25 Mar 2020, Accepted 24 Jul 2020, Published online: 30 Jul 2020

References

  • Ali LAJ. 2014. Welcome to Canada? A critical review and assessment of Canada’s fast-changing immigration policies. Toronto: Ryerson Centre for Immigration & Settlement.
  • Auckland Council. 2017. Auckland’s Asian population [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Mar 11]. https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz%2fplans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws%2four-plans-strategies%2fauckland-plan%2fabout-the-auckland-plan%2fPages%2faucklands-asian-population.aspx.
  • Baldassar L, Baldock CV, Wilding R. 2007. Families caring across borders: migration, ageing and transnational caregiving. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Baldassar L, Merla L. 2014. Introduction: transnational family caregiving through the lens of circulation. In: Baldassar L, Merla L, editor. Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: understanding mobility and absence in family life. New York: Routledge; p. 3–24.
  • Bartley A. 2010. 1.5 generation Asian migrants and intergenerational transnationalism: thoughts and challenges from New Zealand. National Identities. 12(4):381–395.
  • Bartley A, Spoonley P. 2008. Intergenerational transnationalism: 1.5 generation Asian migrants in New Zealand. International Migration. 46(4):63–84.
  • Battistella G, Conaco MCG. 1998. The impact of labour migration on the children left behind: a study of elementary school children in the Philippines. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. 13(2):220–241.
  • Bedford R, Ho E, Lidgard J. 2005. From targets to outcomes: immigration policy in New Zealand, 1996–2003. In: Trlin A, Spoonley P, Watts N, editor. New Zealand and international migration a digest and bibliography, number 4. Vol. 4. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Sociology, Massey University; p. 1–43.
  • Bedford R, Liu LS. 2013. Parents in New Zealand’s family sponsorship policy: a preliminary assessment of the impact of the 2012 policy changes. New Zealand Population Review. 39:25–49.
  • Benítez JL. 2012. Salvadoran transnational families: ICT and communication practices in the network society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 38(9):1439–1449.
  • Best C. 2014. Kinship care and transnational parenting: the intersection of cultural values and practices. Journal of Family Social Work. 17(2):119–135.
  • Bonjour S, Kraler A. 2015. Introduction: family migration as an integration issue? Policy perspectives and academic insights. Journal of Family Issues. 36(11):1407–1432.
  • Borevi K. 2015. Family migration policies and politics: understanding the Swedish exception. Journal of Family Issues. 36(11):1490–1508.
  • Bryceson DF. 2019. Transnational families negotiating migration and care life cycles across nation-state borders. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 45(16):3042–3064.
  • Bryceson DF, Vuorela U, editors. 2002. The transnational family: New European frontiers and global networks. Oxford, UK: Berg.
  • Burke K. 1986. Review of immigration policy August 1986. Wellington: Government Printer.
  • De Bruine E, Hordijk M, Tamagno C, Sánchez AY. 2013. Living between multiple sites: transnational family relations from the perspective of elderly non-migrants in Junín, Peru. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 39(3):483–500.
  • De Silva M. 2017. The care pentagon: older adults within Sri Lankan-Australian transnational families and their landscapes of care. Population, Space and Place. 23(8):1–9.
  • Dreby J. 2006. Honor and virtue: Mexican parenting in the transnational context. Gender & Society. 20(1):32–59.
  • Duncan B, Trejo SJ. 2015. Assessing the socioeconomic mobility and integration of U.S. immigrants and their descendants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 657(1):108–135.
  • Emeka A. 2019. “Just black” or not “just black?” Ethnic attrition in the Nigerian-American second generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 42(2):272–290.
  • Faist T. 2000. Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 23(2):189–222.
  • Glick-Schiller N, Basch L, Blanc-Szanton C. 1992. Towards a definition of transnationalism: introductory remarks and research questions. Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences. 645:ix–xiv.
  • Graham E, Jordan LP, Yeoh BSA, Lam T, Asis M, Su-Kamdi. 2012. Transnational families and the family Nexus: perspectives of Indonesian and Filipino children left behind by migrant parent(s). Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 44(4):793–815.
  • Gutierrez A. 2018. A family affair: How and why second-generation Filipino-Americans engage in transnational social and economic connections. Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies. 41(2):229–247.
  • Haagsman K, Mazzucato V. 2014. The quality of parent–child relationships in transnational families: Angolan and Nigerian migrant parents in The Netherlands. Ethnic and Migration Studies. 40(11):1677–1696.
  • Haas Hd, Fokkema T. 2010. Intra-household conflicts in migration decisionmaking: return and Pendulum migration in Morocco. Population and Development Review. 36(3):541–561.
  • Henderson R. 2007. Aging away: immigrant families, elderly care, ethnography and policy. Anthropology in Action. 14(1 & 2):63–73.
  • Ho E, Bedford R. 2008. Asian transnational families in New Zealand: dynamics and challenges. International Migration. 46(4):41–62.
  • Ho ES, Chiang LN. 2017. Long-distance filial piety: Chinese families in Australasia Caring for elderly parents across borders. Translocal Chinese: East Asian Perspectives. 11(2):278–311.
  • Ho E, Ip M, Bedford R. 2001. Transnational Hong Kong Chinese families in the 1990s. New Zealand Journal of Geography. 111(1):24–30.
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo P, Avila E. 1997. ‘I’m here, but I’m there’: the meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender and Society. 11(5):548–571.
  • Huang S, Yeoh BSA, Lam T. 2008. Asian transnational families in transition: the liminality of simultaneity. International Migration. 46(4):3–13.
  • Huang S, Yeoh BSA. 2005. Transnational families and their children’s education: China’s ‘study mothers’ in Singapore. Global Networks. 5(4):379–400.
  • Immigration New Zealand. 2019a. Information about : parent and grandparent visitor visa [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/new-zealand-visas/apply-for-a-visa/about-visa/parent-and-grandparent-multiple-entry-visitor-visa.
  • Immigration New Zealand. 2019b. Statistics [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/research-and-statistics/statistics.
  • Immigration New Zealand. 2019c. The parent resident visa will reopen with new requirements [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/media-centre/news-notifications/parent-resident-visa-will-reopen-new-requirements.
  • King R, Cela E, Fokkema T, Vullnetari J. 2014. The migration and well-being of the zero generation: transgenerational care, grandparenting, and loneliness amongst Albanian older people. Population, Space and Place. 20(8):728–738.
  • Lam T, Yeoh BSA. 2019. Parental migration and disruptions in everyday life: reactions of left-behind children in Southeast Asia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 45(16):3085–3104.
  • Larsen G. 2013. Family migration to Australia. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
  • Levitt P, Waters MC, editors. 2002. The changing face of home: the transnational lives of the second generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Li WW. 2011. Filial piety, parental piety and community piety: changing cultural practices of elder support among Chinese migrant families in New Zealand. The Journal of Multicultural Society. 2(1):1–30.
  • Lie MLS. 2010. Across the oceans: childcare and grandparenting in UK Chinese and Bangladeshi households. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 36(9):1425–1443.
  • Lima F. 2001. Transnational families: institutions of transnational social space. In: Pries L., editor. New transnational social spaces: International migration and transnational companies in the early 21st century. London: Routledge; p. 77–93.
  • Liu LS. 2011. New Zealand case study of PRC transnational migration: returnees and trans-Tasman migrants. In: Ip M, editor. Transmigration and the new Chinese: theories and practices from the New Zealand experience. Hong Kong: Certre of Asian Studies, the University of Hong Kong; p. 57–101.
  • Liu LS. 2015. Examining trans-Tasman migration of New Zealand’s new immigrants from the People’s Republic of China: a quantitative survey. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 56(2):297–314.
  • Liu LS. 2016. Intergenerational dimensions of transnational Chinese migrant families in New Zealand — A research gap identified. Journal of Chinese Overseas. 12(2):216–250.
  • Liu LS. 2018. Chinese transnational migration in the age of global modernity: the case of oceania. London: Routledge.
  • McMillan K. 2005. Immigration, nationalism, and citizenship debates in the 1990s. In: Trlin A, Spoonley P, Watts N, editor. New Zealand and international migration: a digest and bibliography. Vol. 4. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Sociology, Massey University; p. 70–85.
  • Mok TA. 2015. A long-term therapeutic journey with an Asian “parachute kid.”. Asian American Journal of Psychology. 6(3):281–288.
  • Nedelcu M, Wyss M. 2016. ‘Doing family’ through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks. 16(2):202–218.
  • Parreñas R. 2005. Long distance intimacy: class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks. 5(4):317–336.
  • Portes A. 1999. Conclusion: towards a new world - the origins and effects of transnational activities. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 22(2):463–477.
  • Robinson D. 2013. Migration policy under the coalition government. People Place and Policy. 7(2):73–81.
  • Ryan L. 2008. Navigating the emotional Terrain of families “here” and “there”: women, migration and the management of emotions. Journal of Intercultural Studies. 29(3):299–313.
  • Shih KY. 2016. Transnational families. In: Shehan CL, editor. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell; p. 1–7.
  • Sigad LI, Eisikovits RA. 2013. Grandparenting across borders: American grandparents and their Israeli grandchildren in a transnational reality. Journal of Aging Studies. 27(4):308–316.
  • Simon-Kumar R. 2015. Neoliberalism and the new race politics of migration policy: changing profiles of the desirable migrant in New Zealand. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 41(7):1172–1191.
  • Statistics New Zealand. 2019. NZ.Stat [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. http://nzdotstat.stats.govt.nz/wbos/Index.aspx?_ga=2.60643373.1812678914.1574632754-688401793.1565654482.
  • Sun K.C.-Y. 2014. Transnational kinscription: a case of parachute kids in the USA and their parents in Taiwan. Ethnic and Migration Studies. 40(9):1431–1449.
  • Takeda A. 2012. Emotional transnationalism and emotional flows: Japanese women in Australia. Women’s Studies International Forum. 35(1):22–28.
  • Tamagno C. 2003. “ Entre acá y allá’: vidas transnacionales y desarrollo Peruanos entre Italia y Perú [PhD dissertation]. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
  • Tan L. 2016. Concern as more older migrants left alone. New Zealand Herald [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11635692.
  • Tan L. 2017. Kept apart: Sick parents can’t visit kids in New Zealand. New Zealand Herald [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11803722.
  • Treas J. 2008. Transnational older adults and their families. Family Relations. 57(4):468–478.
  • Treas J, Mazumdar S. 2002. Older people in America’s immigrant families: dilemmas of dependence, integration, and isolation. Journal of Aging Studies. 16(3):243–258.
  • Trlin A. 1992. Change and continuity: New Zealand’s immigration policy in the late 1980s. In: Trlin A., Spoonley P, editor. New Zealand and international migration: A digest and bibliography. Vol. 2. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University; p. 1–28.
  • Trlin A. 1997. For the promotion of economic growth and prosperity: New Zealand’s immigration policy, 1991–1995. In: Trlin A., Spoonley P, editor. New Zealand and International migration: A digest and bibliography. Vol. 3. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Sociology, Massey University; p. 1–27.
  • Tu M. 2019. The transnational one-child generation: family relationships and overseas aspiration between China and the UK. Children’s Geographies. 17(5):565–577.
  • Waters JL. 2002. Flexible families? “Astronaut” households and the experiences of lone mothers in Vancouver. British Columbia. Social and Cultural Geography. 3(2):117–134.
  • Waters JL. 2005. Transnational family strategies and education in the contemporary Chinese diaspora. Global Networks. 5(4):359–377.
  • Whyte MK. 2004. Filial obligations in Chinese families: Paradoxes of modernisation. In: Ikels C, editor. Filial piety: practice and discourse in contemporary East Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press; p. 106–127.
  • Wilding R, Baldassar L. 2009. Transnational family-work balance: experiences of Australian migrants caring for ageing parents and young children across distance and borders. Journal of Family Studies. 15(2):177–187.
  • Wolf DL. 1997. Family secrets: transnational struggles among children of Filipino immigrants. Sociological Perspectives. 40(3):457–482.
  • Wolf DL. 2002. There is no place like ‘Home’: emotional transnationalism and the struggles of second-generation Filipinos. In: Levitt P, Waters MC, editor. The changing face of home: the transnational lives of the second generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; p. 255–294.
  • Wong ST, Yoo GJ, Stewart AL. 2006. The changing meaning of family support among older Chinese and Korean immigrants. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 61(1):S4–S9.
  • Woodhouse M. 2016. NZRP changes to strike the right balance. The beehive [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jun 25]. http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/nzrp-changes-strike-right-balance.
  • Xiang B. 2003. Emigration from China: a sending country perspective. International Migration. 41(3):21–48.
  • Yarris KE. 2017. Care across generations: solidarity and sacrifice in transnational families. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Yeoh BSA, Huang S, Lam T. 2005. Transnationalizing the ‘Asian’ family: imaginaries, intimacies and strategic intents. Global Networks. 5(4):307–315.
  • Yue X, Ng SH. 1999. Filial obligations and expectations in China: current views from young and old people in Beijing. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2(2):215–226.
  • Zentgraf KM, Chinchilla N. 2012. Transnational family separation: a framework for analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 38(2):345–366.
  • Zhou M. 1998. “Parachute Kids” in Southern California: the educational experience of Chinese children in transnational families. Educational Policy. 12(6):682–704.
  • Zickgraf C. 2017. Transnational ageing and the ‘zero generation’: the role of Moroccan migrants’ parents in care circulation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 43(2):321–337.
  • Zontini E, Reynolds T. 2018. Mapping the role of ‘transnational family habitus’ in the lives of young people and children. Global Networks. 18(3):418–436.