Renovating the procedural architecture of international law

References

• Abbott, K.W., et al., 2000. The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. doi: 10.1162/002081800551271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D., 2000. Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. doi: 10.1162/002081800551280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., 2011. International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1017/S175297191000031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R., 2009. Late sovereign diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 4(2), 121–141. doi: 10.1163/187119109X440870
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. and Crook, J.R., 2002. Symposium: the ILC's state responsibility articles – introduction and overview. American Journal of International Law, 96(4), 773–791. doi: 10.2307/3070677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, F.A., 1999. Foundations of world order: the legalist approach to international relations, 1898–1922. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, A.B., 1994. Politics and culture in international history: from the ancient Near East to the opening of the modern age, 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, J. and Toope, S.J., 2010. Legitimacy and legality in international law: an interactional account. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bukovansky, M., 2002. Legitimacy and power politics: the American and French Revolutions in international political culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., 2001. The structures of intergovernmental relations. International Social Science Journal, 53(167), 121–127. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00300
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., 2009. The paradox of federalism: some practical reflections. Regional & Federal Studies, 19(2), 309–319. doi: 10.1080/13597560902753644
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. and Simeon, R., 2002. Intergovernmental relations in Canada: the emergence of collaborative federalism. Publius, 32(2), 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Branch of the International Law Association, 2013. Committees [online]. Available at: http://ila-canada.ca/committees/ [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, A., 2005. International law, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaloux, A., 2013. Water resource management and North American green paradiplomacy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 19(3).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., 1996. On diplomacy in the ancient Near East: the Amarna letters. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 7(2), 245–270. doi: 10.1080/09592299608406003
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, N.C., 2002. Argument and change in world politics: ethics, decolonization, and humanitarian intervention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Declarations Recognizing the Jurisdiction of the Court as Compulsory [online], 2013. Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1&p3=3 [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• DeNardis, L., 2013. The global war for internet governance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denemark, R.A. and Hoffmann, M.J., 2008. Just scraps of paper? The dynamics of multilateral treaty-making. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 43(2), 185–219. doi: 10.1177/0010836708089082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of National Defence, 2013. International Military Training and Policy [online]. Available at: http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/training-international-policy/index.page [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, P. F. and Ku, C., 2010. The dynamics of international law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djalal, H. and Townsend-Gault, I., 1999. Managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea: informal diplomacy for conflict prevention. In: F.O. Hampson, et al., eds. Herding cats: multiparty mediation in a complex world. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 107–134.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., 1996. National interests in international society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K., 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasius, M., 2006. The international criminal court: a global civil society achievement. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, G.W., 1984. The standard of civilization in international society. London, UK: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D., 2013. Between local innovation and global impact: cities, networks and the governance of climate change. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 19(3).
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A., 2013. Consensus dynamics and global governance frameworks: insights from the Kimberley Process on conflict diamonds. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 19(3).
   Google Scholar
• Grenier, F., 2013. The global educational challenge: how Canada can contribute to global developmental solutions through innovation in higher education. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 19(3).
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P.M., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R.B., 1997. Moral authority as a power resource. International Organization, 51(4), 591–622. doi: 10.1162/002081897550465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, H.L.A., 1994. The concept of law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• ILC (International Law Commission), 2001. Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, With Commentaries [online]. Available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• ILC (International Law Commission), 2012. Report of the sixty-fourth session. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R.H., 1990. Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations and the Third World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A.I., 2001. Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 487–516. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K., 1998. Activists beyond borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, E., 2007. A case study of the construction of international hierarchy: British treaty-making against the slave trade in the early nineteenth century. International Organization, 61(2), 311–339. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissinger, H.A., 2000. A world restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the problems of peace, 1812–22, 2nd ed. London, UK: Phoenix Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz, A., 2002. Transnational activism and global transformations: the anti-apartheid and abolitionist experiences. European Journal of International Relations, 8(1), 49–76. doi: 10.1177/1354066102008001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W., 1995. Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W., 2001. Politics in the vernacular: nationalism, multiculturalism, and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J., 1988. Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L.L. and Simmons, B.A., 1998. Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. International Organization, 52(4), 729–757. doi: 10.1162/002081898550734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States [online], 2013. Available at: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-40.html [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., 2004. Arguing, bargaining and all that: communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10(3), 395–435. doi: 10.1177/1354066104045542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C. and Simeon, R., 2007. Recognition without empowerment: minorities in a democratic South Africa. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(4), 699–729. doi: 10.1093/icon/mom025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B., 2002. Returning practice to the linguistic turn: the case of “diplomacy”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 627–651. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310031201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson, S.H.G., 1946. The Congress of Vienna: a study in allied unity, 1812–1822. London, UK: Constable & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S. and Keohane, R.O., 1971. Transnational relations and world politics: an introduction. International Organization, 25(3), 329–349. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuf, N.G., 1989. World of our making: rules and rule in international relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J.M., 2010. The clash of ideas in world politics: transnational networks, states, and regime change, 1510–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A., 2010. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of jihadism – transnational religious insurgencies and the transformation of international orders. Review of International Studies, 36(2), 257–280. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, R., 1998. Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. International Organization, 52(3), 613–644. doi: 10.1162/002081898550671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, M. and Smith, G., 2013. Reimaging the internet: the need for a high-level strategic vision for internet governance, 2015–2020. Waterloo, ON: The Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C., 1999. The moral purpose of the state: culture, social identity, and institutional rationality in international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 2000. “Let's argue!”: communicative action in world politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1162/002081800551109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J.G., 1992. Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution. International Organization, 46(3), 561–598. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J.G., 1998. What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. In: Constructing the world polity: essays on international institutionalization. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, P. W., 1994. The transformation of European politics, 1763–1848. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, P., 2009. Diplomatic theory of international relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simeon, R., 2001. Adaptability and change in federations. International Social Science Journal, 53(167), 145–152. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00303
   Google Scholar
• Simeon, R., 2009. Constitutional design and change in federal systems: issues and questions. Publius, 39(2), 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statute of the International Court of Justice [online], 1945. Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/index.php?p1=4&p2=2&p3=0 [Accessed 17 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S., 1996. The retreat of the state: the diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., 2009. Civilization and empire: China and Japan’s encounter with European international society. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 1945. Charter of the United Nations [online]. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/index.shtml [Accessed 17 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly, 1947. Establishment of an International Law Commission [online], A/RES/174(II), 21 November 1947. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/174(II)&Lang=E&Area=RESOLUTION [Accessed 17 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations [online], 1961. Available at: http://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/UNTS/Volume%20500/v500.pdf [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties [online], 1969. Available at: http://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/UNTS/Volume%201155/v1155.pdf [Accessed 11 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., 1992. The evolution of international society: a comparative historical perspective. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A., 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A., 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar