Le Canada face aux transitions de puissance à travers ses énoncés politiques, 1964–2017

Références

• Allan, Bentley, Vucetic, Srdjan, et Hopf, Ted, 2018. Distribution of identity and the future of international order: China’s hegemonic prospects. International Organization (à Paraître).
   Google Scholar
• Beneš, Vít et Harnisch, Sebastian, 2015. Role theory in symbolic interactionism: Czech Republic, Germany and the EU. Cooperation and Conflict, 50 (1), 146–165. doi: 10.1177/0010836714525768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantir, Cristian et Kaarbo, Juliet dir., 2016. Domestic role contestation, foreign policy, and international relations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, Mark, Canada in a multi-polar world, Remarks by Mr Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of Canada, presented to the Canadian Club of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, 16 mai 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chafetz, Glenn, Spirtas, Michael, et Frankel, Benjamin dir., 1999. The origins of national interests. Londres: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Jae Ho, 2016. The rise of China and east Asia: A New regional order on the horizon? Chinese Political Science Review, 1 (1), 47–59. doi: 10.1007/s41111-016-0006-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdinand, Peter, 2014. Rising powers at the UN: An analysis of the voting behaviour of brics in the general assembly. Third World Quarterly, 35 (3), 376–391. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.893483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron L., 1988. The weary titan. Britain and the experience of relative decline, 1895–1905. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartzke, Erik, 2007. The capitalist peace. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (1), 166–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. dir., 1993. Ideas & foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1964. Livre blanc sur la Défense. Ottawa: Imprimeur de la Reine.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1970a. Politique étrangère au service des Canadiens. Ottawa: Infomation Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1970b. Europe. Politique étrangère au service des Canadiens. Ottawa: Infomation Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, Ministère de la Défense nationale, 1971. La Défense dans les années 1970. Ottawa: Information Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1985. Compétitivité et sécurité : orientations pour les relations extérieures du Canada. Ottawa: Approvisionnements et Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1987. Défis et engagements. Une politique de défense pour le Canada. Ottawa: Approvisionnement et Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1992. La politique de Défense du Canada 1992. Ottawa: Ministère de la Défense nationale, avril.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1994. Le Livre blanc sur la Défense de 1994. Ottawa: Ministère des approvisionnements et Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 1995. Le Canada dans le monde. Énoncé du gouvernement. Ottawa: Gouvernement du Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 2005. Fierté et influence: notre rôle dans le monde (Énoncé de politique internationale du Canada). Ottawa: 19 avril.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 2008. Stratégie de défense “Le Canada d’abord”, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Canada, 2017, Protection, sécurité, engagement. La politique de défense du Canada. Ottawa: Ministère de la Défense nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. et Yarhi-Milo, K., 2012. The personal touch: leaders’ impressions, costly signaling, and assessments of sincerity in international affairs. International Studies Quarterly, 56 (3), 560–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00731.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnisch, Sebastian, 2012. Conceptualizing in the minefield: role theory and foreign policy learning. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8 (1), 47–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00155.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnisch, Sebastian, Frank, Cornelia, et Maull, Hanns W., 2011. Role theory in international relations: approaches and analyses. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, William, 2007. Plus ça change … continuité, changement et culture dans les livres blancs sur la politique étrangère (1947–2005). dans Stéphane Roussel, dir., Culture stratégique et politique de défense. L’expérience canadienne. Montréal: Athéna, 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, Ole, 1970. National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14 (3), 233–309. doi: 10.2307/3013584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, Kristen, 2015. Different paths to power: the rise of Brazil, India and China at the world trade organization. Review of International Political Economy, 22 (2), 311–338. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2014.927387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, 2018. The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94 (1): 7–23. doi: 10.1093/ia/iix241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John, Mastanduno, Michael, et Wohlforth, William C., 2011. Introduction: unipolarity, state behavior, and systemic consequences. dans G. John Ikenberry, Michael Mastanduno et William C. Wohlforth, dirs.., International relations theory and the consequences of unipolarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert L., 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, Juliet et Cantir, Cristian, 2013. Role conflict in recent wars: danish and Dutch debates over Iraq and Afghanistan. Cooperation and Conflict 48 (4), 465–483. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupchan, Charles A., 2013. No one’s world: the west, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, Christopher, 2012. This time it’s real: the End of unipolarity and the Pax americana. International Studies Quarterly, 56 (1), 203–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00704.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Prestre, Philippe, dir., 1997. Role quests in the post-cold War Era: foreign policies in transition. Montreal: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lobell, Steven E., Norrin Ripsman and Jeffrey Taliaferro, eds., 2009. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, Alex, Masson, Isabelle, et Morin, David, 2004. Identité nationale, sécurité et la théorie des relations internationales. Études internationales, 35 (1, mars), 7–24. doi: 10.7202/008445ar
   Google Scholar
• Massie, Justin et Dorion-Soulié, Manuel, 2016. Canada’s China policy in a (declining?) unipolar world: engagement, containment, or indifference? dans Michael K. Hawes et Christopher J. Kirkey, dir. Canadian foreign policy in a unipolar world. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 132–156.
   Google Scholar
• Michaud, Nelson et Tremblay, Stéphane, 2006. Les livres blancs en matière de politique étrangère. Épistémologie et perspectives analytiques. Études Internationales, 37 (1, mars), 7–33. doi: 10.7202/013410ar
   Google Scholar
• Morin, Jean-Frédéric et Paquin, Jonathan, 2018. Foreign policy analysis: A toolbox. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Jr., Joseph S., 2012. The twenty-first century will Not Be a “post-American” world”. International Studies Quarterly, 56 (1), 215–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00698.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, Jr., Joseph S., 2015. Is the American century over?. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pabst, Adrian, 2016. Brexit, post-liberalism, and the politics of paradox. Telos, 2016 (176), 189–201. doi: 10.3817/0916176189
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, Jonathan, 2016. Trump ébranle des piliers de la politique étrangère du Canada. Options politique, 1er novembre 2016. Available from: http://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/november-2016/trump-ebranle-des-piliers-de-la-politique-etrangere-du-canada/
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, Laura et Massie, Justin, 2017. Role conflict: Canada’s withdrawal from combat operations against ISIL. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 72 (3), 298–317. doi: 10.1177/0020702017723357
   Google Scholar
• Posen, Barry R., 2012. From unipolarity to multipolarity: transition in sight? dans G. John Ikenberry, Michael Mastanduno et William C. Wohlforth (dir.), International relations theory and the consequences of unipolarity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 317–341.
   Google Scholar
• Ripsman, Norrin, Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., et Lobell, Steven E., 2016. Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack, 1984. The ideology of the offensive. military decision making and the disaster of 1914. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuenkel, Oliver, 2016. Do the BRICS possess soft power?. Journal of Political Power, 9 (3), 353–367. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, Cameron G. et Breuning, Marijke, 2012. Integrating foreign policy analysis and international relations through role theory. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8 (1), 1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M., 2011. The end of the American era. The National Interest, no. 116, Novembre-Décembre.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Thomas. 2016. Trump’s 19th century Foreign Policy. Politico, 20 January. Available from: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-foreign-policy-213546
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, Fareed, 2009. The post-American world. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar