NAFTA renegotiations and support for Canada-China FTA

References

• Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer, 2010. Are survey experiments externally valid? American Political Science Review, 104 (2), 226–242. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, Michael M., et al., 2015. Reality bites: The limits of framing effects for salient and contested policy issues. Political Science Research and Methods, 3 (3), Cambridge University Press, 683–695. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Scott, 2004. American and Canadian assessments of nafta: opinion on Continental policy and its drivers. American Behavioral Scientist, 47 (10), Sage Publications, 1285–1318. doi: 10.1177/0002764204264256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidengil, Elisabeth, 1995. Economic man–social woman? the case of the gender gap in support for the Canada-United States free trade agreement. Comparative Political Studies, 28 (3), 384–408. doi: 10.1177/0010414095028003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieco, Joseph M., 1988. Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42 (03), 485–507. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027715
   Google Scholar
• Guisinger, Alexandra, 2009. Determining trade policy: do voters hold politicians accountable? International Organization, 63 (03), 533–557. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisinger, Alexandra, 2016. Information, gender, and differences in individual preferences for trade. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 37 (4), 538–561. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1192428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haftel, Yoram Z., and Thompson, Alexander, 2018. When do states renegotiate investment agreements? the impact of arbitration. The Review of International Organizations, 13 (1), Springer, 25–48. doi: 10.1007/s11558-017-9276-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., 1984. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., and Axelrod, Robert, 1985. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38 (1), 226–254. doi: 10.2307/2010357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landriault, Mathieu, and Minard, Paul, 2018. Canada/China free trade agreement: a public opinion appraisal. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 24 (1), Taylor & Francis, 113–117. doi: 10.1080/11926422.2018.1427124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese, 2014. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, Edward D., and Mutz, Diana C., 2009. Support for free trade: self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63 (03), 425–457. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090158
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, Edward D., Mutz, Diana C., and Silver, Laura R., 2015. Men, women, trade, and free markets. International Studies Quarterly, 59 (2), 303–315. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J., 1994. The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19 (3), 5–49. doi: 10.2307/2539078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, Matthew, Wolfe, Robert, and Parkin, Andrew, 2002. Globalization, trade policy and the permissive consensus in Canada. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 28 (3), JSTOR, 351–371. doi: 10.2307/3552227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Timothy, 2010. Power, exit costs, and renegotiation in international law. Harvard International Law Journal, 51 (2), HeinOnline, 379–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana C., and Kim, Eunji, 2017. The impact of ingroup favoritism on trade preferences. International Organization, 71 (4), 827–850. doi: 10.1017/S0020818317000327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, David M., 2004. Borderline interest or identity? American and Canadian opinion on the North American free trade agreement. Comparative Politics, 36 (3), 331–351. doi: 10.2307/4150134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J., 2001. What determines individual trade-policy preferences? Journal of International Economics, 54 (2), 267–292. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00094-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok, Ivan, and Hatfield, Madeleine, 2018. Reinforcing regions in precarious times. Regional Studies, 52 (1), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1401780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok, Ivan, et al., 2017. Global reversal, regional revival? Regional Studies, 51 (1), 1–8. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1255720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuxhorn, Kim-Lee, 2018. Indirect pathways of self-interest and the TPP. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique. doi: 10.1017/S0008423918000628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Comtrade Database, 2019. Available from: https://comtrade.un.org/ [Accessed 20 April 2019 ].
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Robert, and Mendelsohn, Matthew, 2005. Values and interests in attitudes toward trade and globalization: the continuing compromise of embedded liberalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 38 (01), 45–68. doi: 10.1017/S0008423905050055
   Google Scholar