Assessing the graphic turn in Canadian foreign policy

References

• Beier, J. M. (2010). At home on native land: Canada and the united nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples. In J. Marshall Beier, & L. Wylie (Eds.), Canadian foreign policy in Critical perspective (pp. 175–186). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, J. M., & Wylie, L. (2010). Canadian foreign policy in critical perspective. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (1979). A systems concept of society: Beyond individualism and holism. Theory and Decision, 10, 13–30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00126329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (1996). Finding philosophy in social science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (2004). How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansen, S., & James, P. (202X). A graphic turn for Canadian foreign policy: Insights from systemism. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 2X(X), 000–000.
   Google Scholar
• Hlatky, S. v. (2020). Women and gender dynamics in Canadian foreign policy. In B. Bow, & A. Lane (Eds.), Canadian foreign policy: Reflections on a field in transition (pp. 255–268). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. C., & James, P. (2017). Systemism and foreign policy analysis: A new approach to the study of international conflict. In S. A. Yetiv, & P. James (Eds.), Advancing interdisciplinary approaches to international relations (pp. 289–321). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• James, P. (2004). Systemism, social mechanisms, and scientific progress: A case study of the International Crisis Behavior project. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(3), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393104266438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, P. (2019). Systemist international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble, E., & Smith, H. A. (1999). (Re)Defining traditions: Gender and Canadian foreign policy. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• King, H. (2017). The erasure of Indigenous thought in foreign policy. Open Canada. https://opencanada.org/erasure-indigenous-thought-foreign-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, J. (2014). Joining empire: The political economy of the New Canadian foreign policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madokoro, L., & McKenzie, F. (2017). Introduction: Writing race into Canada’s international history. In L. Madokoro, F. McKenzie, & D. Meren (Eds.), Dominion of race: Rethinking Canada’s International history (pp. 3–24). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlinger, E. (1981). On the autonomy of the democratic state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nossal, K. R., Roussel, S., & Paquin, S. (2015). The politics of Canadian foreign policy (4th ed.). Kingston and Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfonner, M. R., & James, P. (2020). The visual international relations project. International Studies Review, 22(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, A. (2001). Mario Bunge’s philosophy of social science. Society, 38(May/June), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-001-1026-5.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. (1971). The scientific study of foreign policy. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadovnikov, S. (2004). Systemism, social laws, and the limits of social theory: Themes out of Mario Bunge’s The sociology-Philosophy connection. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(4), 536–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393104269199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarson, L. (2020). Becoming comfortable being uncomfortable: Canadian foreign policy and Indigenous global politics. In B. Bow, & A. Lane (Eds.), Canadian foreign policy: Reflections on a field in transition (pp. 189–203). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. A., & Cornut, J. (2016). The status of women in Canadian foreign policy analysis. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 37(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1152874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. A., Stienstra, D., & Sjolander, C. T. (2003). Engaging the possibilities of magic: Feminist pedagogy and Canadian foreign policy. In C. T. Sjolander, H. A. Smith, & D. Steinstra (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Canadian foreign policy (pp. 12–21). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stienstra, D., Sjolander, C. T., & Smith, H. A. (2003). Taking up and throwing down the gauntlet: Feminists, gender, and Canadian foreign policy. In C. T. Sjolander, H. A. Smith, & D. Steinstra (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on Canadian foreign policy (pp. 1–11). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, Lana. (2020). “Life and times of critical studies of Canadian foreign policy”. In Brian Bow & Andrea Lane (Eds.), Canadian Foreign Policy: Reflections on a Field in Transition (pp. 55–67). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar