Ecoregionalization assessment: Spatio-temporal analysis of net primary production across Ontario

Literature cited

• Anselin, L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis, 29: 93–115.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. G., 1998. Ecoregions: The Ecosystem Geography of the Oceans and Continents. Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. C. & A. C. Gatrell, 1995. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman, London.
   Google Scholar
• Band, L. E., F. Csillag, A. H. Perera & J. A. Baker, 1999. Deriving an eco-regional framework for Ontario through large-scale estimates of net primary productivity. Forest Research Report No.149, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forestry Research Institute, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Boots, B., 2002. Local measures of spatial association. Écoscience, 9:168–176.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, A. D., P. Haggett, J. K. Ord, K. Bassett & R. Davies, 1975. Elements of Spatial Structure: A Quantitative Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N. A. C., 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Csillag, F., 1997. Quadtrees: Hierarchical multi-resolution data structures for analysis of digital images. Pages 247–271 in D. A. Quattrochi & M. F. Goodchild (ed.). Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Csillag, F. & J. Agnew, 1995. How many Italys? A spatial statistical regionalization of electoral data over time. Pages 85–106 in J. Eagles (ed.). Spatial Contextual Research in Geography. Taylor and Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Csillag, F., B. Boots, M.-J. Fortin, K. Lowell & F. Potvin, 2001. Multiscale characterization of boundaries and landscape ecological patterns. Geomatica, 55: 291–307.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles, J., 1995. Spatial Contextual Research in Geography. Taylor and Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ecological Stratification Working Group, 1996. A national ecological framework for Canada. Forest Research Report No.149, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, and Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Getis, A., 1994. Spatial dependence and heterogeneity and proximal databases. Pages 105–120 in S. Fotheringham & P. Rogerson (ed.). Spatial Analysis and GIS. Taylor and Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Getis, A. & J. K. Ord, 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24: 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, S. J. & S. D. Prince, 1996. Remote sensing of net primary production in boreal forest stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 78: 149–179.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M., 1986. Spatial Autocorrelation, Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography. Geo Books, Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Goward, S. N., R. H. Waring, D. G. Dye & J. Yang, 1994. Ecological remote sensing at OTTER: Satellite macroscale observations. Ecological Applications, 4: 322–343.
   Google Scholar
• Haining, R., 1990. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Handcock, R. N., 2001. Spatio-temporal analysis of net primary production across Ontario using an ecoregionalization. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Handcock, R. N., S. Mitchell & F. Csillag, 1999. Monte-Carlo sensitivity analysis of spatial partitioning schemes : Regional predictions of nitrogen-loss. Pages 247–254 in K. Lowell & A. Jaton (ed.). Spatial Accuracy Assessment: Land Information Uncertainty in Natural Resources. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, G. A., 1961. The ecological basis for land-use planning. Research Report No. 46, Ontario Department of Lands and Forest, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, G. F. & F. G. Caspall, 1971. Error on coropleth maps: Definition, measurement, reduction. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 61: 217–244.
   Google Scholar
• Jurdant, M., 1968. Ecological classification of forest lands: An integrated vegetation-soil-landform approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg, J. J. & R. H. Waring, 1997. A generalized model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management, 95: 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C., 1979. Introduction to Statistics: A Nonparametric Approach for the Social Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., J. M. Chen, J. Cihlar & W. M. Park, 1997. A process-based boreal ecosystem productivity simulator using remote sensing inputs. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62: 158–175.
   Google Scholar
• Longley, P. & M. Batty (ed.), 1996. Spatial Analysis: Modeling in a GIS Environment. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Myneni, R. B., C. D. Keeling, C. J. Tuckers, G. Asrar & R. R. Nemani, 1997. Increased plant growth in northern high latitudes from 1981–1991. Nature, 386: 698–702.
   Google Scholar
• NEF, 1999. National Ecological Framework for Canada: Version 2.1. http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/coverage/intro.html.
   Google Scholar
• PAL, 1998. NOAA/NASA Pathfinder AVHRR Land dataset. http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/CAMPAIGN_DOCS/FTP_SITE/readmes/pal.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pielou, E. C., 1977. Mathematical Ecology. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, S. D., 1991. A model of regional primary production for use with coarse resolution satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12: 1313–1330.
   Google Scholar
• Quattrochi, D. A. & M. F. Goodchild (ed.), 1997. Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Rastetter, E. B., A. W. King, B. J. Cosby, G. M. Hornberger, R. V. O’Neill & J. E. Hobbie, 1992. Aggregating fine scale ecological knowledge to model coarser-scale attributes of ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 2: 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Schloss, A. L., D. W. Kicklighter, J. Kaduk, U. Wittenburg, et al., 1999. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Comparison of NPP to climate and the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Global Change Biology, Supplement 1, 5: 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Snedecor, G. W. & W. G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., 1990. Spatial Epidemiology. Pion, London.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. J. & P. J. Sellers, 1986. Satellite remote sensing for pri-mary production. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7: 1395–1416.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, D., 1981. Introductory Spatial Analysis. Methuen, London.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, G. & B. Fingleton, 1985. Spatial Data Analysis by Example. J. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, R. H. & S. W. Running, 1998. Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at Multiple Scales. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, R. & M. Oliver, 1990. Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wulder, M. & B. Boots, 1998. Local spatial autocorrelation characteristics of remotely-sensed imagery assessed with the Getis statistic. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19: 2223–2231.
   Google Scholar