Development and testing of phenologically driven grizzly bear habitat models

Literature cited

• Anderson, D. R., K. P. Burnham & W. L. Thompson, 2000. Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64: 912–923.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous, 1998. Cumulative Effects Assessment (CEA) Application for Grizzly Bears. Version 1. Users Guide. Jasper National Park, Jasper, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M. S. & L. L. McDonald, 1999. Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 268–272.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M. S. & J. S. Waller, 2000. The application of resource selection functions analysis to estimate the number of grizzly bears that could be supported by habitats in the Bitterroot ecosystem. Pages 6–231 to 6–241 in C. Servheen (ed.). Grizzly Bear Recovery in the Bitterroot Ecosystem. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix 21B. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Missoula, Montana.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P. & D. R. Anderson, 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., A. S. Hadi & B. Price, 2000. Regression Analysis by Example. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. W., P. C. Paquet & A. P. Curlee, 1996. Introduction to special section: Large carnivore conservation in the Rocky Mountains of the United States and Canada. Conservation Biology, 10: 936–939.
   Google Scholar
• Crist, E. P. & R. C. Cicone, 1984. Application of the tasseled cap concept to simulated thematic mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 50: 343–352.
   Google Scholar
• Dussault, C., R. Courtois, J. P. Ouellet & J. Huot, 1999. Evaluation of GPS telemetry collar performance for habitat studies in the boreal forest. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27: 965–972.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, A. H. & J. F. Bell, 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24: 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. E., G. B. Stenhouse, M. J. Hansen, C. C. Popplewell, J. A. Dechka & D. R. Peddle, 2001. An integrated decision tree approach (IDTA) to mapping landcover using satellite remote sensing in support of grizzly bear habitat analysis in the Alberta Yellowhead Ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 27: 579–592.
   Google Scholar
• Garshelis, D. L., 2000. Delusions in habitat evaluation: Measuring use, selection, and importance. Pages 111–164 in L. Boitani & T. K. Fuller (ed.), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gibeau, M. L., 1998. Grizzly bear habitat effectiveness model for Banff, Yoho, and Kootenay National Parks, Canada. Ursus, 10: 235–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S., J. Bentz, D. O’Leary & D. Clish, 1998. Common Ecological Land Classification and Associated Attribute Database for the Yellowhead Ecosystem. 2nd edition. GEOWEST Environmental Consultants Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, D., 1996. Buffaloberry [Shepherdia canadensis (L.) Nutt.] fruit production in fire-successional bear feeding sites. Journal of Range Management, 49: 520–529.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, D. & S. Herrero, 1987. Grizzly bear food and habitat in the Front Ranges of Banff National Park, Alberta. International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 7: 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, D., S. Herrero & K. Brady, 1991. Food and habitat used by grizzly bears, Ursus arctos, along the Continental Divide in Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta. Canadian-Field Naturalist, 105: 325–329.
   Google Scholar
• Holcroft, A. C. & S. Herrero, 1984. Grizzly bear digging sites for Hedysarum sulphurescens roots in southwestern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62: 2571–2575.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, W. D. & G. M. Coen, 1982. Ecological (Biophysical) Land Classification of Banff and Jasper National Parks. Volume II. Soil and Vegetation Resources. Alberta Institute of Pedology Publication No. SS-82–44, Edmonton, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Honacki, J. H., K. E. Kinman & J. W. Koeppl, 1982. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Allen Press and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, G. A. & K. L. Parker, 2001. Impact of human activities on grizzly bear habitat in Jasper National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29: 624–638.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Jr. & S. Lemeshow, 1980. Goodness-of-fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics, A9: 1043–1069.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Jr. & S. Lemeshow, 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, M. E., G. V. Hilderbrand, C. Servheen, C. C. Schwartz, S. M. Arthur, T. A. Hanley, C. T. Robbins & R. Michener, 1999. Trophic relations of brown and black bears in several western North American ecosystems. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63: 921–929.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. H., 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61: 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Kansas, J. L. & R. N. Riddell, 1995. Grizzly Bear Habitat Model for the Four Contiguous Mountain Parks. Second Iteration. Riddell Environmental Research Ltd., Red Deer, Alberta and URSUS Ecosystem Management Ltd., Calgary, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• La Roi, G. H. & R. J. Hnatiuk, 1980. The Pinus contorta forests of Banff and Jasper National Parks: A study in comparative synecology and syntaxonomy. Ecological Monographs, 50: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, J. J., 1999. Resource selection functions: Taking space seriously. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 399–400.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, R. D., J. S. Waller, T. L. Manley, L. J. Lyon & H. Zuuring, 1996. Relationship among grizzly bears, roads and habitat in the Swan Mountains, Montana. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 1395–1404.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, R. D., J. S. Waller, T. L. Manley, K. Ake & W. T. Wittinger, 1999. Landscape evaluation of grizzly bear habitat in western Montana. Conservation Biology, 13: 367–377.
   Google Scholar
• Manel, S., H. C. Williams & S. J. Ormerod, 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: The need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38: 921–931.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, T. L., K. Ake & R. D. Mace, 1992. Mapping grizzly bear habitat using Landsat TM satellite imagery. Pages 231–240 in J. D. Greer (ed.). Remote Sensing and Natural Resource Management. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Manly, B. F. J., L. L. McDonald & D. L. Thomas, 1993. Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. Chapman & Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, D. J., 2000. Causes and consequences of dietary differences among Yellowstone grizzly bears (Ursus arctos). Ph.D. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, D. J., K. Barber, R. Maw & R. Renkin, 1999. Coefficients of productivity for Yellowstone’s grizzly bear habitat. U.S.G.S. Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Moscow, Idaho.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, B. N. & V. Banci, 1999. Status and management of the brown bear in Canada. Pages 46–50 in C. Servheen, S. Herrero & B. Peyton (ed.). Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Gland.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenoff, D. J., T. A. Sickley, R. G. Haight & A. P. Wydeven, 1995. A regional landscape analysis and prediction of favourable gray wolf habitat in the northern Great Lakes region. Conservation Biology, 9: 279–294.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. L., 2001. A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationship studies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65: 613–623.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, E. H., 1994. The Flora of Alberta. 2nd edition. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. E. & A. Haney, 1998. Gradient responses for understory species in a bracken-grassland and northern-dry forest ecosystem of northeast Wisconsin. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Arts, Letters, and Sciences, 86: 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. E., M. S. Boyce, G. B. Stenhouse & R. H. M. Munro, 2002. Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead Ecosystem of Alberta: Taking autocorrelation seriously. Ursus, 13: 533–542.
   Google Scholar
• Obbard, M. E., B. A. Pond & A. Perera, 1998. Preliminary evaluation of GPS collars for analysis of habitat use and activity patterns of black bears. Ursus, 10: 209–217.
   Google Scholar
• Otis, D. L. & G. C. White, 1999. Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63: 1039–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Rettie, W. J. & P. D. McLoughlin, 1999. Overcoming radiotelemetry bias in habitat-selection studies. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77: 1175–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Schooley, R. L., 1994. Annual variation in habitat selection: Patterns concealed by pooled data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 58: 367–374.
   Google Scholar
• Swets, J. A., 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240: 1285–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, R. H. & S. W. Running. 1998. Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at Multiple Scales. 2nd edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. D., S. W. Running, R. Nemani, R. E. Keane & K. C. Ryan, 1997. Measurement and remote sensing of LAI in Rocky Mountain montane ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27: 1714–1727.
   Google Scholar
• Zweig, M. H. & G. Campbell, 1993. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 39: 561–577.
   Google Scholar