Faible niveau d’agressivité intraspécifique chez les colonies d’Anochetus ghilianii (Spinola, 1851) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) au Rif occidental (Nord-Ouest du Maroc)

Références

• Bagnères AG, Morgan ED. 1991. The postpharyngeal glands and the cuticle of Formicidae contain the same characteristic hydrocarbons. Experientia. 47:106–111.
   Google Scholar
• Beye M, Neumann P, Chapuisat M, Pamilo P, Moritz RFA. 1998. Nestmate recognition and the genetic relatedness of nests in the ant Formica pratensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43:67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG. 2010. Chapter 1. History and overview of insect hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG, editors. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry and chemical ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton B. 2014. An online catalog of the ants of the world [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 30]. Available from: http://antcat.org
   Google Scholar
• Bos N, Dreier S, Jørgensen CG, Nielsen J, Guerrieri FJ, D’Ettorre P. 2012. Learning and perceptual similarity among cuticular hydrocarbons in ants. J. Insect Physiol. 58:138–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briese DT. 1983. Different modes of reproductive behaviour (including a description of colony fission) in a species of Chelaner (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux. 30:308–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WL Jr. 1978. Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. Part VI. Ponerinae, Tribe Ponerini, Subtribe Odontomachiti. Section B. Genus Anochetus and bibliography. Stud. Entomol. 20:549–652.
   Google Scholar
• Cagniant H. 1976. Distribution, écologie et nid de la fourmi Cataglyphis cursor Fonscolombe. Hyménoptères Formicidae. Vie et Milieu, Serie C, Biologie Terrestre. 26:265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Cagniant H. 2006. Liste actualisée des fourmis du Maroc (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecologische Nachrichten. 8:193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Chapuisat M, Bernasconi C, Hoehn S, Reuter M. 2004. Nestmate recognition in the unicolonial ant Formica paralugubris. Behav. Ecol. 16:15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chéron B, Cronin AL, Doums C, Fédérici P, Haussy C, Tirard C, Monnin T. 2011. Unequal resource allocation among colonies produced by fission in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Ecology. 92(7):1448–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clémencet J, Viginier B, Doums C. 2005. Hierarchical analysis of population genetic structure in the monogynous ant Cataglyphis cursor using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 14(12):3735–3744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin AL, Molet M, Doums C, Monnin T, Peeters C. 2013. Recurrent evolution of dependent colony foundation across eusocial insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58:37–55. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811–153643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosland MW. 1989. Kin recognition in the ant Rhytidoponera confusa. I. Environmental odour. Anim. Behav. 37:912–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahbi A, Cerdá X, Hefetz A, Lenoir A. 1996. Social closure, aggressive behavior and cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in the polydomous ant Cataglyphis iberica (Hymenoptera Formicidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 22:2173–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debout G, Schatz B, Elias M, Mckey D. 2007. Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90:319–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drescher J, Bluthgen N, Heike F. 2007. Population structure and intraspecific aggression in the invasive ant species Anoplolepis gracilipes in Malaysian Borneo. Mol. Ecol. 16:1435–1465.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Escudero I, Seppä P, Pamilo P. 2001. Dependent colony founding in the ant Proformica longiseta. Insectes Sociaux. 48:80–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielde AM. 1904. Power of recognition among ants. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol. Lab. 7:227–250.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon DM, Kulig AW. 1996. Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests. Ecology. 77:2393–2409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze J, Foitzik S, Hippert A, Hölldobler B. 1996. Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environmental based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology. 102:510–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. 1990. The Ants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 732 p.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer B, Chapuisat M, Kremer N, Finet C, Keller L. 2006. Unicoloniality, recognition and genetic differentiation in a native Formica ant. J. Evol. Biol. 19:2031–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffé K, Marcuse M. 1983. Nestmate recognition and territorial behavior in the ant Odontomachus bauri Emery (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Insectes Sociaux. 30:466–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowers MJ, Taheri A, Reyes-López J. 2015. The ant Anochetus ghilianii (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), not a Tertiary relict, but an Iberian introduction from North Africa: evidence from mtDNA analyses. Syst. Biodivers. doi:10.1080/14772000.2015.1061065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutsum AR, Saunders TS, Cherrett JM. 1979. Intraspecific aggression in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus. Anim. Behav. 27:839–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzerke A, Neumann P, Pirk CW, Bliss P, Moritz RF. 2006. Seasonal nestmate recognition in the ant Formica exsecta. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61:143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaden M, Wehner R. 2003. Nest defense and conspecific enemy recognition in the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis. J. Insect Behav. 16:717–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langen TA, Tripet F, Nonacs P. 2000. The red and the black: habituation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert Pheidole ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48:285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Moli F, Mori A.1990. Laboratory experiments on environmental sources of nestmate and non-nestmate discrimination in three species of Formica ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche. 97:147–169.
   Google Scholar
• Le Moli F, Mori A, Grasso DA. 1992. Nestmate and conspecific non-nestmate recognition in Formica cunicularia Latr.: the effect of diet differences. In: Billen J, editor. Biology and evolution of social insects. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, p. 161–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lenoir A, Fresneau D, Errard C, Hefetz A. 1999. Individual and colonial identity in ants: the emergence of the social representation concept. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels, JM, editors. Information processing in social insects. Bâle: Birkhauser, p. 219–237.
   Google Scholar
• Lenoir A, Hefetz A, Simon T, Soroker V. 2001. Comparative dynamics of gestalt odour formation in two ant species Camponotus fellah and Aphaenogaster senilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Physiol. Entomol. 26:275–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenoir A, Quérard L, Pondicq N, Berton F. 1988. Reproduction and dispersal of the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Psyche. 95:21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas C. 2002. Etude des bases chimiques et comportementales de la formation du « visa » colonial chez les Ponérines du genre Pachycondyla [thèse]. Paris, France: Université Paris XI, 158 p.
   Google Scholar
• Martin SJ, Drijfhout F. 2009. A rewiew of ant cuticular hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Ecol. 35:1151–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SJ, Helanterä H, Kiss K, Lee YR, Drijfhout FP. 2009. Polygyny reduces rather than increases nestmate discrimination cue diversity in Formica exsecta ants. Insectes Sociaux. 56:375–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SJ, Vitikainen E, Helanterä H, Drijfhout F. 2008. Chemical basis of nest-mate discrimination in the ant Formica exsecta. Proc. R. Soc. B. 275:1271–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier JL. 1999. Territorialité et agressivité intra- et interspécifique dans les mosaïques de fourmis arboricoles. L’Année Biologique. 38:149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RS. 1967. Pattern and process in competition. Adv. Ecol. Res. 4:1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Nowbahari M, Lenoir A. 1984. La fermeture des sociétés de la fourmi Cataglyphis cursor: relations avec la distance géographique. In: De Haro A,& X. Espadaler X, editors. Processus d’acquisition précoce. Les communications. Publ. Univ. Autonoma Barcelona et SFECA, p. 457–461.
   Google Scholar
• Obin MS. 1986. Nestmate recognition cues in laboratory and field colonies of Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): effect of environment and role of cuticular hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Ecol. 12: 1965–1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obin MS, Vander Meer RK. 1988. Sources of nestmate recognition cues in the imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim. Behav. 36:1371–1381.
   Google Scholar
• Passera L, Aron S. 2005. Les fourmis: comprtement, organisation social et évolution. Ottawa, ON: Les presses scientifiques du CNRC, 480 p.
   Google Scholar
• Patek SN, Baio JE, Fisher BL, Suarez AV. 2006. Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103(34):12787–12792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson K. 1896. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 187:253–318.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters C, Ito F. 2001. Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social Hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46:601–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters C, Molet M. 2010. Colonial reproduction and life histories. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K, editors. Ant ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Pisarski B. 1982. Influence de la structure sociale sur le comportement agressif des ouvrieres de Formica (Coptoformica) exsecta Nyl. In: Pisarski B, editor. Structure et organisation des sociétés de fourmis de l’espèce Formica (Coptoformica) exsecta Nyl. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Memorabilia Zoologica, 38, p. 113–136.
   Google Scholar
• Provost E. 1991. Nonnestmate kin recognition in the ant Leptothorax lichtensteini: evidence that genetic factors regulate colony recognition. Behav. Genet. 21:151–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retana J, Cerdá X. 1995. Agonistic relationships among sympatric Mediterranean ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Insect Behav. 8(3):365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross KG, Vander Meer RK, Fletcher DJC, Vargo EL. 1987. Biochemical phenotypic and genetic studies of two introduced fire ants and their hybrid (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Evolution. 41:280–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanada-Morimura S, Minai M, Yokoyama M, Hirota T, Satoh T, Obara Y. 2003. Encounter-induced hostility to neighbors in the ant Pristomyrmex pungens. Behav. Ecol. 14:713–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AA, Millar JC, Hanks LM, Suarez AV. 2012. Experimental evidence that workers recognize reproductives through cuticular hydrocarbons in the ant Odontomachus brunneus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66:1267–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith BH, Breed MD. 1995. The chemical basis for nestmate recognition and mate discrimination in insects. In: Cardé RT, Bell WJ, editors. Chemical ecology of insects. New York: Chapman & Hall, 287–317.
   Google Scholar
• Soroker V, Lucas C, Simon T, Fresneau D, Durand LJ, Hefetz A. 2003. Hydrocarbon distribution and colony odour homogenisation in Pachycondyla apicalis. Insectes Sociaux. 50:212–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorvari JP, Theodora P, Turillazzi S, Hakkarainen H, Sundstrom L. 2007. Food resources, chemical signalling, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica aquilonia. Behav. Ecol. 19:441–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinola M. 1851. Compte rendu des Hyménoptères inédits provenants du voyage entomologique de M. Ghiliani dans le Para en 1846. Extrait des Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences de Turin (2). 13:3–78
   Google Scholar
• Suarez A, Holway DA, Dangsheng L, Tsutsui ND, Case J. 2002. Spatiotemporal patterns of intraspecific aggression in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim. Behav. 64:697–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temeles EJ. 1994. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they dear enemies? Anim. Behav. 47:339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisâ CM, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA. 2007. Contact between supercolonies elevates aggression in Argentine ants. Insectes Sociaux. 54:225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinaut A, Bensusan K, Guillen R. 2011. Redescription of the queen of Anochetus ghilianii (Spinola, 1851) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Boletin de la Asociacion Espanola de Entomologia. 35(1–2):151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Tinaut A, Ruano F, Martínez Ibáñez MD, Bensusan K, Guillem R. 2011. Anochetus ghilianii (Spinola, 1851). In: Verdú JR, Numa C, Galante E, editors. Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados amenazados de España (Especies Vulnerables). Dirección General del Medio Natural y Política Forestal, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Medio Rural y Marino, p. 431–435.
   Google Scholar
• Torres CW, Brandt M, Tsutsui ND. 2007. The role of cuticular hydrocarbons as chemical cues for nestmate recognition in the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Insectes Sociaux. 54:363–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripet F, Fournier D, Nonacs P, Keller L. 2006. Kin recognition and the paradoxical patterns of aggression between colonies of a Mojave desert Pheidole ant. Insectes Sociaux. 53:127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson EO. 1971. Competitive and aggressive behavior. In: Eisenberg JF, Dillon W, editors. Man and beast: comparative social behavior. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 181–218.
   Google Scholar