Censusing a tawny owl (Strix aluco) population living at high density merging two consolidated techniques

References

• Andersen T. 1961. A population of tawny owl (Strix aluco) in Northern Zealand, studied in the breeding season. Dansk Orn Foren Tidsskr. 55:21–55.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby BM, Redpath SM. 1997. Variation in the male territorial hoot of the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in three English populations. Ibis. 139:152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe S. 2000. Bird census techniques. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolboacă LE, Artem E, Amarghioalei V. 2015. Breeding densitis of Tawny owl (Strix aluco) in Eastern Moldova region (Romania). Analele științifice ale Univ ”Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iași, s Biol Anim. 61:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Calenge C. 2006. The package adehabitat for the R software: tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Modell. 197:1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman SN, Balmer DE, Crick HQP. 2006. On the censusing of Tawny owls Strix aluco. Bird Census News. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti P. 1994. Patterns of territory size and defence level in rural and urban tawny owl (Strix aluco) populations. J Zool. 234:641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeotti PR, Appleby BM, Redpath SM. 1996. Macro and microgeographical variations in the “hoot” of Italian and English tawny owls (Strix aluco). Ital J Zool. 63:57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti PR, Pavan G. 1991. Individual recognition of male Tawny owls (Strix aluco) using spectrograms of their territorial calls. Ethol Ecol Evol. 3:113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirons GJM. 1985. The effects of territorial behaviour on the stability and dispersion of Tawny owl (Strix aluco) populations. J Zool. 1:21–48.
   Google Scholar
• IBCC. 1969. Recomendations for an international standard for mapping method in bird census work. Bird Study. 16:248–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AE, Ten Cate C, Bijleveld C. 2001. The interobserver reliability of scoring sonagrams by eye: a study on methods, illustrated on zebra finch songs. Anim Behav. 62:791–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffezzoli L, Martignoni C 2010. Report: relazione ornitologica SIC e ZPS “Bosco Fontana”. Indagine conoscitiva di aggiornamento sugli uccelli a fini gestionali [Report on the bird fauna. Study on the birds for management purposes]. In: Hardersen S, Toni I, editors. Integrazione del Piano di Gestione della Riserva Naturale Statale e Sito Natura 2000 IT 20B0011 Bosco della Fontana. Mantova (Italy): Programma di Sviluppo Rurale 2007–2013 (FEARS). Regione Lombardia, Azione 323 A.
   Google Scholar
• Martin P, Bateson P. 1986. Measuring behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monti P, Todini A. 2013. L’Allocco e i rapaci notturni a Roma. Ente Regionale RomaNatura, Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy CM, Rockwell RF. 2012. Identification of individual Eastern Screech-Owls Megascops asio via vocalization analysis. Bioacoustics. 21:127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penteriani V, Pinchera F. 1990. Censimento di una popolazione di Allocco, Strix aluco, in un massiccio montuoso dell’Appennino Centrale (Abruzzo). Riv Ital Di Ornitol. 60:20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Peri A. 2017. A comparison of three methods for planning a census of Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) populations living at high territorial density. Bioacoustics. 4622:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard KA, Blumstein DT, Griffin SC. 2010. Pre-screening acoustic and other natural signatures for use in noninvasive individual identification. J Appl Ecol. 47:1103–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranazzi L, Manganaro A, Ranazzi R, Salvati L. 2000. Woodland cover and tawny owl Strix aluco density in a Mediterranean urban area. Biota. 1:83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ranazzi L, Ranazzi R, Manganaro A. 1992. Censimento dell’Allocco in un parco urbano (Villa Doria Pamphili, Roma). SupplRIcBiolSelvaggina. 16:389–392.
   Google Scholar
• Redpath SM. 1994. Censusing Tawny Owls Strix aluco by the use of imitation calls. Bird Study. 41:192–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi R, Galeotti P, Boccola S, Baccalini F. 2004. Occupancy rate and habitat variables influencing nest-box use in the tawny owl (Strix aluco). Avocetta. 28:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Salvati L, Manganaro A, Ranazzi L. 2002. Wood quality and the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in different forest types of central Italy. Ornis Svecica. 12:47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DG, Carpenter T. 1987. General census considerations. Biology and conservation of northern forest owls: symposium proceedings, February 3–7, 1987, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Southern HN. 1970. The natural control of a population of Tawny Owls (Strix aluco). JZool, Lond. 162:197–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde P. 2005. Predators control post-fledging mortality in tawny owls, Strix aluco. Oikos. 110:461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde P, Bolstad MS. 2004. A telemetry study of the social organization of a tawny owl (Strix aluco) population. J Zool. 263:65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde P, Bolstad MS, Moller JD. 2003. Reversed sexual dimorphism in tawny owls, Strix aluco, correlates with duty division in breeding effort. Oikos. 101:265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde P, Redpath SM. 2006. Combining information from range use and habitat selection : sex-specific spatial responses to habitat fragmentation in tawny owls Strix aluco. Ecography. 29:152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry A, Peake TM, Mcgregor PK. 2005. The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Front Zool. 16:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Turini R. 1995. Censimento di Allocco (Strix aluco L.), nell’oasi faunistica toscan dell’orrido di Botri (Lucca). Atti Soc Tosc Sci Nat, Mem, Ser B. 102:69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Van Winkle W. 1975. Comparison of several probabilistic home-range models. J Wildl Manage. 39:118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrezec A. 2006. Breeding density of Tawny Owl Strix aluco territories in montane forests of Mountain Bjelasica (Montenegro). Ciconia. 14:41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Vrezec AL. 2003. Breeding density and altitudial distribution of the Ural, Tawny, and Boreal Owls in North Dinaric Alps (Central Slovenia). J Raptor Res. 37:55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiącek J, Polak M. 2010. The role of forest age, habitat quality, food resources and weather conditions for Tawny Owl Strix aluco populations. Polish J Environ Stud. 19:1039–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington-Hill J, Conway G. 2017. Tawny Owl Strix aluco response to call-broadcasting and implications for survey design. Bird Study. 64:205–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapponi L, Minari E, Longo L, Toni I. 2014. The Habitat-Trees experiment : using exotic tree species as new microhabitats for the native fauna. iForest. 8:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zuberogoitia I, Campos LF. 1998. Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola. 45:47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zuberogoitia IA, Martinez-Climent JA. 2000. Methods for surveying Tawny Owl Strix aluco populations in large areas. Biota. 1/2:79–88.
   Google Scholar