Public opinion toward a misunderstood predator: what do people really know about wolverine and can educational programs promote its conservation?

References

• Andersone Ž, Ozolinš J. 2004. Public perception of large carnivores in Latvia. Ursus. 15:181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne R, Packer J, Hughes K, Dierking L. 2007. Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environ Educ Res. 13:367–383.
   Google Scholar
• Balmford A, Leader-Williams N, Mace GM, Manica A, Walter O, West C, Zimmermann A. 2007. Message received? Quantifying the impact of informal conservation education on adults visiting UK zoos. In: Zimmermann A, Hatchwell M, Dickie L, West C, editors. Catalysts for conservation: a direction for zoos in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 120–136.
   Google Scholar
• Banci VA. 1994. Wolverine. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Buskirk SW, Lyon LJ, Zielinski WJ, editors. The scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores: American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States. Fort Collins (CO): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station; p. 99–127.
   Google Scholar
• Bath AJ, Enck JW. 2003. Wildlife-human interactions in national parks in Canada and the USA. Soc Sci Res Rev. 4:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Benson K. 2014. Gwich’in traditional knowledge: nèhtrùh (Wolverine). Fort McPherson (NT): Gwich’in Social and Cultural Institute, Gwich’in Renewable Resources Board.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerke T, Østdahl T, Kleiven J. 2003. Attitudes and activities related to urban wildlife: pet owners and non-owners. Anthrozoos. 16:252–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright AD, Manfredo MJ, Fulton DC. 2000. Segmenting the public: an application of value orientation to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildl Soc Bull. 28:218–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell MO, Alvarado MET. 2011. Public perceptions of jaguars Panthera onca, pumas Puma concolor and coyotes Canis latrans in El Salvador. Area. 43:250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr N. 2016. Star attractions and damp squibs at the zoo: a study of visitor attention and animal attractiveness. Tour Recreat Res. 41:326–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton S, Fraser J, Saunders CD. 2009. Zoo experiences: conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biol. 28:377–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COSEWIC. 2014. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the wolverine Gulo gulo in Canada [Internet]. Ottawa. http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/virtual_sara/files/cosewic/sr_wolverine_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dayer AA, Stinchfield HM, Manfredo MJ. 2007. Stories about wildlife: developing an instrument for identifying wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Hum Dimens Wildl. 12:307–315.
   Google Scholar
• De Pinho J, Grilo C, Boone RB, Galvin KA, Snodgrass JG. 2014. Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. PLoS One. 9:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker DJ, Lauber TB, William FS. 2002. Human-wildlife conflict management: a practitioner’s guide. Ithaca: Northeast Wildlife Damage Management Research and Outreach Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Derwin CW, Piper JB. 1988. The African rock Kopje exhibit ‒ evaluation and interpretive elements. Environ Behav. 20:435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmann-Easler D, Pease JL. 1999. Evaluating the effectiveness of residential environmental education programs in fostering positive attitudes toward wildlife. J Environ Educ. 31:33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt AL, Schacter DL. 2016. False memories with age: neural and cognitive underpinnings. Neuropsychologia. 91:346–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap RE. 2002. An enduring concern. Public Perspect. 13:10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles PF, Muffit S. 1990. An analysis of children’s attitudes toward animals. J Environ Educ. 21:41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Canada. 2016. Recovery strategy for the wolverine (Gulo gulo), Eastern population, in Canada. Ottawa:Series S at RARSS.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson G, Heberlein TA. 2003. Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biol Conserv. 111(2):149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson G, Kindberg J, Bostedt G. 2007. Willingness to pay (WTP) for wolverine Gulo gulo conservation. Wildlife Biol. 2:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Sandström C, Ericsson G. 2015. Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves. Wildlife Biol. 21:131–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk JH, Reinhard EM, Vernon C, Bronnenkant K, Heimlich JE, Deans NL. 2007. Why zoos and aquariums matter: assessing the impact of a visit to a zoo or aquarium. Silver Spring (MD): Association of Zoos and Aquariums.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez EJ, Tamborski MA, Pickens SR, Timberlake W. 2009. Animal-visitor interactions in the modern zoo: conflicts and interventions. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 120:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figari H, Skogen K. 2011. Social representations of the wolf. Acta Sociol. 54:317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin C, Banci VA, Brazil J, Crête M, Huot J, Michel H, Lafond R, Paré P, Shaefer J, Vandal D. 2005. Plan national de rétablissement du Carcajou (Gulo gulo) [Population de l’Est]. Québec: Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton DC, Manfredo MJ, Lipscomb J. 1996. Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Hum Dimens Wildl. 1:24–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gallant D, Gauvin LY, Berteaux D, Lecomte N. 2016. The importance of data mining for conservation science: a case study on the wolverine. Biodivers Conserv. 25:2629–2639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnthorsdottir A. 2001. Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoos. 14:204–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyles J. 1736. Memoirs of odd adventures, strange deliverances, etc. in the captivity of John Giles, Esq: commander of the garrison on Saint George River, in the district of Maine. Charleston (SC): Nabu Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hash HS. 1987. Wolverine. Toronto (Canada): Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein T, Ericsson G. 2008. Public attitudes and the future of wolves Canis lupus in Sweden. Wildlife Biol. 14:391–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann TM, Schüttler E, Benavides P, Galvez N, Sohn L, Palomo N. 2013. Values, animal symbolism, and human-animal relationships associated to two threatened felids in Mapuche and Chilean local narratives. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 9:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson S, McDuff M, Monroe M. 2015. Conservation education and outreach techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert BM, Rush C. 1996. Human culture and large carnivore culture conservation in North America. Conserv Soc. 10:977–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert SR. 1984. American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals – an update. Int J Study Anim Probl. 1:87–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert SR, Berry JK. 1987. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildl Soc Bull. 15(3):363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert SR, Westervelt MO. 1984. Children’s attitudes, knowledge and behaviors towards animals. Child Environ Quarterly. 1:8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman DG. 1989. Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation. Biol Sci. 39:152–161.
   Google Scholar
• Knight AJ. 2008. “Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection. J Environ Psychol. 28:94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela A, Kaartinen S, Aspi J, Kojola I, Helle P, Rytkönen S. 2013. Does grey wolf presence affect habitat selection of wolverines? Ann Zool Fennici. 50:216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretser HE, Curtis PD, Francis JD, Pendall RJ, Knuth BA. 2009. Factors affecting perceptions of human-wildlife interactions in residential areas of northern New York and implications for conservation. Hum Dimens Wildl. 14:102–118.
   Google Scholar
• Luebke JF, Clayton S, DeGregoria Kelly LA, Grajal A. 2015. Global climate change attitudes and perceptions among south American zoo visitors. Zoo Biol. 34:393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo MJ, Teel TL, Bright AD. 2003. Why are public values toward wildlife changing? Hum Dimens Wildl. 8:287–306.
   Google Scholar
• McNaught C, Lam P. 2010. Using Wordle as a supplementary research tool. Qual Rep. 15:630–643.
   Google Scholar
• Milenković M. 2008. Large carnivores as added value – economic, biological and cultural aspects. In: Potts RG, Hecker K, editors. Coexistence of large carnivores and humans: threat or benefit? Proceedings of the international symposium preceding the 54th CIC general assembly; 1 May 2007; Belgrade, Serbia. Budakeszi (Hungary): CIC – International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation; p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell G, Obradovich S, Sumner D, DeMorris K, Lofton L, Minor J, Cotton L, Foster T. 1990. Cage location effects on visitor attendance at three Sacramento Zoo mangabey enclosures. Zoo Biol. 9:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan JM, Gramann JH. 1989. Predicting effectiveness of wildlife education programs: a study of students’ attitudes and knowledge toward snakes. Wildl Soc Bull. 17:501–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss A, Esson M. 2010. Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes. Zoo Biol. 29:715–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers OE, Saunders CD, Garett E, Erik G. 2003. What do children think animals need? Aesthetic and psycho-social conceptions. Environ Educ Res. 9:305–325.
   Google Scholar
• Oli MK, Taylor IR, Rogers ME. 1994. Snow leopard Panthera uncia predation of livestock: an assessment of local perceptions in the Annapurna conservation area, Nepal. Biol Conserv. 68:63–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario Wolverine Recovery Team. 2013. Recovery strategy for the Wolverine (Gulo gulo) in Ontario. Peterborough (Canada):Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Owens P. 2005. Children’ s environmental values in the early school years. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ. 14:37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Packer J, Ballantyne R. 2010. The role of zoos and aquariums in education for a sustainable future. New Dir Adult Cont Educ. 2010(127):25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick PG, Matthews CE, Ayers DF, Tunnicliffe SD. 2007. Conservation and education: prominent themes in zoo mission statements. J Environ Educ. 38:53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Paul ES, Serpell JA. 1993. Pet ownership in childhood: its influence on attitudes towards animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 35:296.
   Google Scholar
• Peastitute J. 2013. Kuihkwahchaw, Naskapi wolverine legends. 1st ed. Quebec City (Canada): The Naskapi Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Rabb G. 2004. The evolution of zoos from menageries to centers of conservation and caring. Curator Museum J. 47:237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Randler C. 2010. Animal related activities as determinants of species knowledge. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 6:237–243.
   Google Scholar
• Reade LS, Waran NK. 1996. The modern zoo: how do people perceive zoo animals? Appl Anim Behav Sci. 47:109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røskaft E, Händel B, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP, Händel B, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP. 2007. Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildlife Biol. 13:172–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan C, Saward J. 2004. The zoo as ecotourism attraction – visitor reactions, perceptions and management implications: the case of Hamilton zoo, New Zealand. J Sustain Tour. 12:245–266.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder OA. 1995. Zoological parks and the conservation of biological diversity: linking ex situ and in situ conservation efforts. J Environ Dev. 4:105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Savard R. 1971. Carcajou et le sens du monde: récits montagnais-naskapi. Montreal (Canada): Ministère des Affaires culturelles.
   Google Scholar
• Seton E. 1953. Lives of game animals. Boston: Charles T. Branford Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard CL, Speelman LR. 1986. Affecting environmental attitudes through outdoor education. J Environ Educ. 17:20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Skibins J. 2015. Ambassadors or attractions? Disentangling the role of flagship species in wildlife tourism. In: Markwell K, editor. Animals and tourism: understanding diverse relationships. Bristol (UK): Channel View Publications; p. 256–273.
   Google Scholar
• Small E. 2011. The new Noah’s Ark: beautiful and useful species only. Part 1. Biodiversity conservation issues and priorities. Biodivers. 12:232–247.
   Google Scholar
• Swanagan JS. 2000. Factors influencing zoo visitors’ conservation attitudes and behavior. J Environ Educ. 31:26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant MA, Bright AD, Ken Cordell H. 1997. Attitudes toward wildlife species protection: assessing moderating and mediating effects in the value-attitude relationship. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tikka PM, Kuitunen MT, Tynys SM. 2000. Effects of educational background on students’ attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. J Environ Educ. 31:12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk J, Gustavsen L, Mysterud A, May R, Flagstad Ø, Brøseth H, Andersen R, Andersen R, Steen H, Landa A. 2008. Diet shift of a facultative scavenger, the wolverine, following recolonization of wolves. J Anim Ecol. 77:1183–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West P, Brockington D. 2006. An anthropological perspective on some unexpected consequences of protected areas. Conserv Biol. 20:609–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CK, Ericsson G, Heberlein TA. 2002. A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972–2000). Wildl Soc Bull. 30:575–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf RL, Tymitz BL. 1980. Studying visitor perceptions of zoo environments: a naturalistic view. Int Zoo Yearb. 21:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford W 2014. Wolverines: behind the myth. Alaska Fish & Wildlife News [Internet]. http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=wildlifenews.view_articleandarticles_id=692
   Google Scholar
• Yalowitz SS. 2004. Evaluating visitor conservation research at the Monterey Bay aquarium. Curator Museum J. 47:283–298.
   Google Scholar