Vegetation in rural roadsides of the Pampa region (Argentina): an opportunity for grassland conservation?

References

• Akbar KF, Hale WH, Headley AD. 2008. Floristic composition and environmental determinants of roadside vegetation in north England. Polish J Ecol. 57:73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso S, Nuciari MC, Guma IR, Van Olphen A. 2009. Flora de un área de la Sierra La Barrosa (Balcarce) y fenología de especies con potencial ornamental. [Flora of an area of the Sierra La Barrosa (Balcarce) and phenology of species with ornamental potential]. Rev FCA UNCuyo. 41:23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso SI, Peretti A. 2006. Malezas plaga de la agricultura argentina, catálogo de semillas y plántulas [Weed plague of argentine agriculture, seeds and seedlings' catalog]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): UNMdP.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shehbaz IA, Salariato DL. 2012. Flora Argentina. Flora vascular de la República Argentina. Dicotyledoneae, Brassicaceae. [Vascular flora of the Argentine Republic. Dicotyledoneae, Brassicaceae.] Córdoba (Argentina): Instituto de Botánica Darwinion-Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas.
   Google Scholar
• Arenas JM, Escudero A, Mola I, Casado MA. 2017. Roadsides: an opportunity for biodiversity conservation. Appl Veg Sci. 20:527–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auestad I, Rydgren K, Austad I. 2016. Near-natural methods promote restoration of species-rich grassland vegetation-revisiting a road verge trial after 9 years. Restor Ecol. 24:381–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagnato C, Conde C, Noe Y, Caride C, Baeza S, Paoli H, Paoli H, Vallejos M, Gallego F, Vale L, et al. 2012. Utilización de firmas espectrales de alta resolución temporal para la elaboración de mapas de uso agrícola y estimaciones de superficie cultivada a escala de lote en Argentina y Uruguay. [Use of spectral signatures of high temporal resolution for the elaboration of maps of agricultural use and estimates of cultivated land area in Argentina and Uruguay]. Córdoba (Argentina): Congreso Argentino de Teledetección; p. 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker JP, Berendse F. 1999. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. TEE. 14:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Belesky DP, Fedders JM. 1996. Does endophyte influence regrowth of tall fescue? Ann Bot. 78:499–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? TEE. 18:182–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bernes C, Bullock JM, Jakobsson S, Rundlöf M, Verheyen K, Lindborg R. 2017. How are biodiversity and dispersal of species affected by the management of roadsides? A systematic map. Environ Evid. 6:24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilenca D, Miñarro F. 2004. Identificación de Áreas Valiosas de Pastizal (AVPs) en las Pampas y Campos de Argentina, Uruguay y sur de Brasil. [Identification of Valuable Grassland Areas (AVPs) in the Pampas and Campos of Argentina, Uruguay and southern Brazil]. Buenos Aires: Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist MM, Bekker RM, Vos P. 2003. Restoration of ditch bank plant species richness: the potential of the soil seed bank. Appl Veg Sci. 6:179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RN, Sawyer CD. 2012. Plant species diversity of highway roadsides in southern New England. Northeast Nat. 19:25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Burgos JJ, Vidal AL. 1951. Los climas de la República Argentina, según la nueva clasificación de Thornthwaite. Serie agroclimática. [The climates of the argentine republic, according to the new classification of Thornthwaite. Agroclimatic series]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Servicio Meteorológico Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera AL. 1963. Compuestas. Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. [Asteraceae. Flora of the province of Buenos Aires]. Tomo 4 (6). Buenos Aires (Argentina): Colección Científica del INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera AL. 1965a. Oxalidáceas a Umbelíferas. Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. [Oxalidacea to Umbellifereae. Flora of the province of Buenos Aires]. Tomo 4(4). Buenos Aires (Argentina): Colección Científica del INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera AL. 1965b. Ericáceas a Caliceráceas. Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. [Ericacea to Calyceraceae. Flora of the province of Buenos Aires]. Tomo 4(5). Buenos Aires (Argentina): Colección Científica del INTA
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera AL. 1967. Piperáceas a Leguminosas. Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. [Piperacea to Leguminosae. Flora of the province of Buenos Aires]. Tomo 4(3).Buenos Aires (Argentina): Colección Científica del INTA
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera AL. 1968. Pteridófitas. Gimnospermas y Monocotiledóneas (excepto Gramíneas). Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. [Pteridophyta. Gymnosperms to Monocotyledonous (except Gramineae). Flora of the province of Buenos Aires]. Tomo 4(1). Buenos Aires (Argentina): Colección Científica del INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera AL. 1970. Gramíneas. Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. [Gramineae. Flora of the province of Buenos Aires]. Tomo 4(2). Buenos Aires (Argentina): Colección Científica del INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Caride C, Pineiro G, Paruelo JM. 2012. How does agricultural management modify ecosystem services in the argentine Pampas? The effects on soil C dynamics. Agr Ecos Env. 154:23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comparatore VM, Martínez MM, Vasallo AI, Barg M, Isacch JP. 1996. Abundancia y relaciones con el hábitat de aves y mamíferos en pastizales de Paspalum quadrifarium (Paja Colorada) manejados con fuego (Pcia. de Buenos Aires, Argentina). [Abundance and relations with the habitat of birds and mammals in grasslands of Paspalum quadrifarium (Paja Colorada) managed with fire (Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina)]. Interciencia. 2:228–237.
   Google Scholar
• D’Acunto L, Semmartin M, Ghersa CM. 2014. Uncropped field margins to mitigate soil carbon losses in agricultural landscapes. Agr Ecos Env. 183:60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Fuente EB, Perelman SB, Ghersa CM. 2010. Weed and arthropod communities in soyabean as related to crop productivity and land use in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. Weed Research. 50:561–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Riva EG, Casado MA, Jimenez MD, Mola I, Costa-Tenorio M, Balaguer L. 2011. Rates of local colonization and extinction reveal different plant community assembly mechanisms on road verges in central Spain. J Veg Sci. 22:292–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers B, De Becker P, Honnay O, Hermy M, Muys B. 2004. Sunken roads as habitats for forest plant species in a dynamic agricultural landscape: effects of age and isolation. J Biogeogr. 32:99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decourtye A, Mader E, Desneux N. 2010. Landscape enhancement of floral resources for honey bees in agro-ecosystems. Apidologie. 41:264–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delucchi G. 2006. Las especies vegetales amenazadas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires: una actualización. [Threatened plant species of the Province of Buenos Aires: an update]. APRONA. Boletines Científicos. 39:19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Di Iorio OR, Farina J. 2006. La fauna de Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). [The fauna of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the province of Buenos Aires (Argentina)]. Rev Museo Arg Cs Nat. 8:261–287.
   Google Scholar
• Di Iorio OR, Farina J. 2009. Plantas hospedadoras de Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) host plants of the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina]. Rev Museo Arg Cs Nat. 11:77–99.
   Google Scholar
• Duelli P, Obrist MK. 2003. Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agr Ecos Env. 98:87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverría ML, Alonso SI, Comparatore VM. 2017. Survey of the vascular plants of Sierra Chica, the untouched area of the Paititi Natural Reserve (southeastern Tandilia mountain range, Buenos Aires province, Argentina). Check List. 13:1003–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Chiti J. 1999. Hierbas y plantas curativas. [Herbs and healing plants]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Condorhuasi.
   Google Scholar
• Forman RT. 1995. Land Mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forman RT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshall CD, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman CR, Heanue K, et al. 2003. Road ecology. Science and solutions. Covelo (CA): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frangi J. 1975. Sinopsis de las comunidades vegetales y el medio de las sierras de Tandil (Provincia de Buenos Aires). [Synopsis of plant communities and hills’ environment of Tandil (Province of Buenos Aires)]. Bol Soc Arg Bot. 16:29–319.
   Google Scholar
• Gelbard J, Belnap J. 2003. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv Biol. 17:420–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghersa CM, León RJC. 2001. Ecología del paisaje pampeano: consideraciones para su manejo y conservación. [Pampas landscape ecology: considerations for its management and conservation]. In: Naveh Z, Lieberman AS, editors. Ecología de paisajes. Teoría y aplicación. [Landscape ecology. Theory and application]. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Agronomía; p. 471–512.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel PE, Batista WH, Texeira M, Martinez-Ghersa MA, Omacini M, Ghersa CM. 2008. Neotyphodium endophyte infection frequency in annual grass populations: relative importance of mutualism and transmission efficiency. Proc Royal Soc London B. 275:897–905.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera L 2007. Impacto de la fragmentación del paisaje sobre la estructura comunitaria y el valor pastoril de pastizales remanentes pampeanos. [Impact of landscape fragmentation on community structure and grazing value of pampean remnant grasslands] [ doctoral Thesis]. Mar del Plata (Argentina): Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera L, Laterra P. 2011. Relative influence of disturbance histories and landscape patterns on floristic structure and diversity of fragmented grasslands. Appl Veg Sci. 14:181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera LP, Sabatino MS, Jaimes FR, Poggio S. 2017a. Una propuesta para valorar el estado de conservación de los bordes de caminos rurales en el Sudeste Bonaerense. [A proposal to assess the conservation status of roadsides in southeastern Buenos Aires]. Ecología Austral. 27:404–417.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera LP, Sabatino MC, Jaimes FR, Saura S. 2017b. Landscape connectivity and the role of small habitat patches as stepping stones: an assessment of the grassland biome in South America. Biod Conser. 26:3465–3479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilty JA, Lidicker WZ, Merenlender AM. 2006. Corridor ecology: the science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, et al. 2006. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 15:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [INTA] Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. 1991. Cartas de suelo de la República Argentina, E 1: 50000. [Soil maps of the Argentine Republic, E 1:50,000]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Ediciones INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez MD, Ruiz-Capillas P, Mola I, Pérez-Corona E, Casado MA, Balaguer L. 2011. Soil development at the roadside: a case study of a novel ecosystem. Land Degrad Dev. 24:564–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laterra P, Orúe E, Zelaya DK, Booman G, Cabria F. 2009. Jerarquización y mapeo de pastizales según su provisión de servicios ecosistémicos. [Hierarchy and mapping grasslands according to its provision of ecosystem services]. In: De Patta Pillar V, Müller SC, de Souza Castilhos AM, Ávila Jacque AV, editors. Campos sulinos - conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade. Brasília: MMA; p. 128–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lázaro-Lobo A, Ervin GN. 2019. A global examination on the differential impacts of roadsides on native vs. exotic and weedy plant species. Glob Ecol Conserv. 17:e00555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre LFJ. 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• León RJC, Burkart SE, Movia CP. 1979. La vegetación de la República Argentina. Relevamiento fitosociológico del pastizal del norte de la Depresión del Salado (Partido de Magdalena y Brandsen, provincia de Buenos Aires). [The vegetation of the Argentine Republic. Phytosociological survey of the northern grassland of the Salado Depression (Magdalena and Brandsen Counties, province of Buenos Aires)]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Ediciones INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Lepš J, Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindborg R. 2007. Evaluating the distribution of plant life history traits in relation to current and historical landscape configurations. J Ecol. 95:555–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindborg R, Plue J, Andersson K, Cousins SAO. 2014. Function of small habitat elements for enhancing plant diversity in different agricultural landscapes. Biol Conserv. 169:206–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Tarmi S, Helenius J. 2002. Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland. Agr Ecos Env. 89:137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzocca A. 1976. Manual de malezas. [Weed manual]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Hemisferio Sur.
   Google Scholar
• Marzocca A. 1997. Vademecum de malezas medicinales de la Argentina. Indígenas y exóticas. [Vademecum of medicinal weeds of Argentina. Indigenous and exotics]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Orientación Gráfica.
   Google Scholar
• Medan D, Torretta JP. 2015. The reproduction of Colletia hystrix and late-flowering in Colletia (Rhamnaceae: Colletieae). Plant Syst Evol. 301:1181–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modernel P, Rossing WA, Corbeels M, Dogliotti S, Picasso V, Tittonell P. 2016. Land use change and ecosystem service provision in Pampas and Campos grasslands of southern South America. Environ Res Lett. 11:113002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina GAR, Poggio SL, Ghersa CM. 2014. Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position. Agr Ecosys Environ. 192:135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monasterolo M, Medan D, Montaldo N, Devoto M. 2015. Elementos lineales del paisaje en agroecosistemas, su rol como facilitadores de la polinización. [Linear landscape elements in agroecosystems, their role as pollination facilitators]. Mar del Plata (Argentina): CISEN IV.
   Google Scholar
• Montero GA 2008. Comunidades de artrópodos en vegetación de áreas no cultivadas del sudeste de Santa Fe. [Arthropod communities in vegetation of uncultivated areas in southeastern Santa Fe]. [ master’s thesis]. Rosario (Argentina): National University of Rosario.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York: Wiley and Son.
   Google Scholar
• Múlgura ME, O´Leary N, Rotman AD. 2012. Flora Argentina. Flora vascular de la República Argentina 14. Dicotyledoneae, Verbenaceae. [Argentine Flora. Vascular flora of the Argentine Republic 14. Dicotyledoneae, Verbenaceae]. Córdoba (Argentina): Instituto de Botánica Darwinion-Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas.
   Google Scholar
• Odriozola ER. 2009. Problemas sanitarios en bovinos vinculados a la intensificación ganadera. [Health problems in cattle linked to livestock intensification]. Azul (Argentina): Jornada técnica sobre sanidad animal y nutrición mineral en recursos forrajeros; p. 255–266.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J. 2015. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/opetus/metodi/vegantutor.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega E, Laterra P. 2003. Fire-cued colonization of a Flooding Pampa grassland by thistle species: remnant litter and interference effects. Appl Veg Sci. 6:35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parera A, Viglizzo E. 2014. Índice de Contribución a la Conservación de Pastizales Naturales del Cono Sur de Sudamérica (ICP): criterios y parámetros para su desarrollo. [Natural Grassland Conservation Contribution Index of the Southern Cone of South America (ICP): criteria and parameters for its development]. In: Parera A, Paullier I, Weyland F, editors. Índice de Contribución a la Conservación de Pastizales Naturales del Cono Sur. Una herramienta para incentivar a los productores rurales. [Contribution to the Conservation of Natural Grasslands of the Southern Cone. A tool to incentivize rural farmers]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Aves de Uruguay; p. 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Poggio S, Chaneton E, Ghersa M. 2010. Landscape complexity differentially affects alpha, beta, and gamma diversities of plants occurring in fencerows and crop fields. Biol Conserv. 143:2477–2486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez C, Herrera L. 2012. El valor ecológico potencial de los ambientes lineales: riqueza vegetal en bordes de vías de la Pampa Interserrana de Tandil. [The potential ecological value of linear environments: plant richness at the edge of roads of the Interserrana Pampa of Tandil]. Luján (Buenos Aires): Reunión Argentina de Ecología.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport E, Marzoca A, Drausal B. 2009. Malezas comestibles del Cono sur. [Edible weeds of the Southern Cone]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Ediciones INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Pyßek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib. 6:93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Roitman G, Preliasco P. 2012. Guía de reconocimiento de herbáceas de la Pampa deprimida. Características para su manejo. Buenas prácticas para una ganadería sustentable de pastizal. [Herbaceous recognition guide of the flooding Pampa. Features for their management. Good practices for sustainable grassing farming]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Aves Argentinas.
   Google Scholar
• Romero O. 1982. Comportamiento de dos especies en secano: pasto ovillo y festuca. [Behavior of two species in dry land: “pasto ovillo” and fescue]. IPA Carillanca. 1:14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rudgers JA, Mattingly WB, Koslow JM. 2005. Mutualistic fungus promotes plant invasion into diverse communities. Oecologia. 144:463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatino MC, Maceira NO, Aizen MA. 2010. Direct effects of habitat area on interaction diversity in pollination webs. Ecol Indic. 20:1491–1497.
   Google Scholar
• Sáez A, Sabatino M, Aizen M. 2014. La diversidad floral del borde afecta la riqueza y abundancia de visitantes florales nativos en cultivos de girasol. [The floral diversity of field margins influences the richness and abundance of native flower visitors in sunflower fields]. Ecología Austral. 24:94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez RO, Nuñez MV 2004. El sistema de Tandilia: una aproximación a la definición de su espacialidad y compartimentación territorial. [The Tandilia system: an approach to the definition of its spatiality and territorial compartmentalization]. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Segundo Congreso de la Ciencia Cartográfica y IX Semana Nacional de Cartografía.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ. editors. 1991. Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Scheneiter JO 2005. Manejo de pasturas de festuca alta. Documento de resumen. [Pasture management of tall fescue. Summary document]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Jornada de campo: Avance en producción y manejo de pasturas.
   Google Scholar
• Scheneiter JO, Kaufmann II, Ferreyra AR, Llorente RT. 2015. The herbage productivity of tall fescue in the Pampas region of Argentina is correlated to its ecological niche. Grass For Sci. 71:403–412.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers P, Joenje W. 2002. Modelling the effect of fertiliser, mowing, disturbance and width on the biodiversity of plant communities of field boundaries. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 93:351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirimarco X, Barral MP, Villarino SH, Laterra P. 2017. Water regulation by grasslands: A global meta‐analysis. Ecohydrology. 11(4): e1934.
   Google Scholar
• Soons MB, Messelink JH, Jongejans E, Heil GW. 2005. Habitat fragmentation reduces grassland connectivity for both short-distance and long-distance wind-dispersed forbs. J Ecol. 93:1214–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano A, RJC L, Sala OE, Lavado RS, Deregibus VA, Cauéphé MA, Scaglia OA, Velázquez CA, Lemcoff JH. 1991. Río de la Plata Grasslands. In: Couplan RT, editor. Natural grasslands. Introduction and western hemisphere. Ecosystems of the world. New York: Elsevier; p. 367–407.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner GP, Smallbone L. 2009. Effects of road age on the structure of roadside vegetation in south-eastern Australia. Agr Ecosys Environ. 129:57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JJ, Williams PA, Timmins SM, Smale MC. 2009. Distribution and spread of environmental weeds along New Zealand roadsides. New Zeal J Ecol. 33:190–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Braak CJF. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio. 69:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemeyer B, Kahle P, Lennartz B. 2006. Nutrient losses from artificially drained catchments in North-Eastern Germany at different scales. Agr Water Manag. 85:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torretta JP, Poggio SL. 2013. Species diversity of entomophilous plants and flower-visiting insects is sustained in the field margins of sunflower crops. J Nat Hist. 47:139–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol Letters. 8:857–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valicenti R, Farina E, Scaramuzzino R, D’Alfonso C. 2010. Ordenación de la vegetación en el paisaje Boca de la Sierras (Azul, Sistema de Tandilia). [Vegetation management in Boca de la Sierras landscape (Azul, Tandilia System)]. RASADEP. 1:111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Valladares F, Tena D, Matesanz S, Bochet E, Balaguer L, Costa-Tenorio M, Tormo J, García-Fayos P. 2008. Functional traits and phylogeny: what is the main ecological process determining species assemblage in roadside plant communities? J Veg Sci. 19:381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa PM, de Siqueira Cardinelli L, Magnago LF, Heringer G, Venâncio Martins S, Viana Campos P, Rodrigues AC, Viana Neri A, Alves Meira-Neto JA. 2018. Relación especie-área y distribución de la abundancia de especies en una comunidad vegetal de un inselberg tropical: efecto del tamaño de los parches. [Species-area relationship and distribution of the species abundance in a plant community of a tropical inselberg: effect of patch size]. Rev Biol Trop. 66:937–951.
   Google Scholar
• Zuloaga FO, Anton AM, Rúgolo Z. 2012a. Flora Argentina. Flora vascular de la República Argentina 3 (1). [Argentine flora. Vascular flora of the Argentine Republic. 3 (1)]. Córdoba (Argentina): Gráficamente Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Zuloaga FO, Anton AM, Rúgolo Z. 2012b. Flora Argentina. Flora vascular de la República Argentina 3 (2). [Argentine flora. Vascular flora of the Argentine Republic. 3 (2)]. Córdoba (Argentina): Gráficamente Ediciones.
   Google Scholar