Citizen science and aquatic macroinvertebrates: public engagement for catchment-scale pollution vigilance

References

• Alba-Tercedor J, Sánchez-Ortega A. 1988. Un método rápido y simple para evaluar la calidad biológica de las aguas corrientes basado en el de Hellawell. Limnetica. 4(5):1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage P, Moss D, Wright J, Furse M. 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Res. 17:333‑347. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(83)90188-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August TA, West SE, Robson H, Lyon J, Huddart J, Velasquez LF, Thornhill I. 2019. Citizen meets social science: predicting volunteer involvement in a global freshwater monitoring experiment. Freshw Sci. 38(2):321–331. doi:10.1086/703416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, Brucet S, Courrat A, Poikane S, Solimini A, van de Bund W, Zampoukas N, Hering D. 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the water framework directive. Ecol Indic. 18:31–41. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks SJ, Fitch B, Davy-Bowker J, Alvarez-Codesal S. 2019. Anglers’ Riverfly Monitoring Initiative (ARMI): A UK-wide citizen science project for water quality assessment. Freshw Sci. 38(2):270–280. doi:10.1086/703397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton LR. 2003. The Mersey Basin: an historical assessment of water quality from an anecdotal perspective. Sci Total Environ. 314-316:53–66. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00094-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascade Consulting. 2013. Evaluation of the catchment based approach pilot stage. Final Evaluation Report. Manchester: Cascade Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke RT, Wright JF, Furse MT. 2003. RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers. Ecol Model. 160(3):219–233. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00255-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordery S. 1995. Friendly societies and the discourse of respectability in Britain, 1825-1875. J Brit Stud. 34:35–58. doi:10.1086/386066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fiore D, Fitch B. 2016. The Riverfly Monitoring Initiative: structured community data gathering informing statutory response. Environmental Scientist. 25(2):37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Everall NC, Johnson MF, Wood P, Farmer A, Wilby RL, Measham N. 2017. Comparability of macroinvertebrate biomonitoring indices of river health derived from semi-quantitative and quantitative methodologies. Ecol Indic. 78:437–448. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard M. 2008. Selection of taxa as indicators of river and freshwater wetland quality in the UK. Aquat Conserv. 18:1052–1106. doi:https://dx.doi.10.1002/aqc.896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Extence CA, Balbi DM, Chadd RP. 1999. River flow indexing using British benthic macroinvertebrates: a framework for setting hydroecological objectives. Regul River. 15:543–574. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199911/12)15:6<545::aid-rrr561>3.0.CO;2-W.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch B, Brooks S, Brierley B. 2018. A review of the Anglers’ Riverfly Monitoring Initiative in England, 2017 to 2018. Ambleside: Riverfly Partnership & Freshwater Biological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Furse MT, Wright JF, Armitage PD, Moss D. 1981. An appraisal of pond-net samples for biological monitoring of lotic macro-invertebrates. Water Res. 15:679–689. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(81)90160-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gérin-Lajoie J, Herrmann TM, MacMillan GA, Hébert-Houle E, Monfette M, Rowell JA, Soucie TA, Snowball H, Townley E, Lévesque E, et al. 2018. IMALIRIJIIT: a community-based environmental monitoring program in the George River watershed, Nunavik, Canada. Écoscience. 25(4):381–399. doi:10.1080/11956860.2018.1498226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glendell M, Extence C, Chadd R, Brazier RE. 2014. Testing the pressure-specific invertebrate index (PSI) as a tool for determining ecologically relevant targets for reducing sedimentation in streams. Freshwater Biol. 59:53–367. doi:10.1111/fwb.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsky M. 1998. The growth and distribution of English friendly societies in the early nineteenth century. Econ Hist Rev. 51(3):489–511. doi:10.1111/1468-0289.00102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham PM, Dickens WS, Taylor RJ. 2004. miniSASS - A novel technique for community participation in river health monitoring and management. Afr J Aquat Sci. 29(1):25–35. doi:10.2989/16085910409503789.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory C, Brierley G, Le Heron R. 2011. Governance spaces for sustainable river management. Geogr Compass. 5(4):182–199. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00411.x.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths A. 2016. Reviving a river. Countryfile. 2016(October):52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Groulx M, Fishback L, Winegardner A. 2019. Citizen science and the public nature of climate action. Polar Geography 42(3): 176–195. doi:10.1080/1088937X.2019.1597396
   Google Scholar
• Growns I, Schiller C, O’Connor N, Cameron A, Gray B. 2006. Evaluation of four live-sorting methods for use in rapid biological assessments using macroinvertebrates. Environ Monit Assess. 117:173–192. doi:10.1007/s10661-006-0231-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase P, Pauls S, Sundermann A, Zenker A. 2004. Testing different sorting techniques in macroinvertebrate samples from running waters. Limnologica. 34:366–378. doi:10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80006-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes HA. 1998. Origin and development of the biological monitoring working party (BMWP) score system. Water Res. 32(3):964–968. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00275-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilsenhoff WL. 1988. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a Family-level biotic index. J N Am Benthol Soc. 7(1):65–68. doi:10.2307/1467832.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley R, Rothwell J, Woodward J. 2017. Metal contamination of bed sediments in the Irwell and Upper Mersey catchments, northwest England: exploring the legacy of industry and urban growth. J Soil Sediment. 17(11):2648–2665. doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1668-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones FC. 2008. Taxonomic sufficiency: the influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Rev. 16:45–69. doi:10.1139/A07-010.
   Google Scholar
• Kobori H, Dickinson JL, Washitani I, Sakurai R, Amano T, Komatsu N, Kitamura W, Takagawa S, Koyama K, Ogawara T, et al. 2016. Citizen science: a new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation. Ecol Res. 31:1–19. doi:10.1007/s11284-015-1314-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimore JA, Steen PJ. 2014. Integrating freshwater science and local management through volunteer monitoring partnerships: the Michigan clean water corps. Freshwr Sci. 33(2):686–692. doi:10.1086/676118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenat DR, Resh VH. 2001. Taxonomy and stream ecology: the benefits of genus- and species-level identifications. J N Am Benthol Soc. 20(2):287–298. doi:10.2307/1468323
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist B. 2002. Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biol. 47:679–694. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00895.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh DM, Cosentino BJ. 2019. Causes and consequences of non-random drop-outs for citizen science projects: lessons from the North American amphibian monitoring program. Freshwater Sci. 38(2):292–302. doi:10.1086/701672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh T, Kirby C, Muchan K, Barker L, Henderson E, Hannaford J. 2016. The winter floods of 2015/2016 in the UK - a review. Wallingford: Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Mason CF. 2002. Biology of freshwater pollution. 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nerbonne JF, Nelson KC. 2008. Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: tensions among group goals, data quality, and outcomes. Environ Manage. 42:470–479. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9103-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollis DJ, Dallas HF, Esler KJ, Boucher C. 2006. Bioassessment of the ecological integrity of river ecosystems using aquatic macroinvertebrates: an overview with a focus on South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci. 31(2):205–227. doi:10.2989/16085910609503892.
   Google Scholar
• Paisley MF, Walley WJ, Trigg DJ. 2007. Revision and testing of BMWP scores. Final Report for Scottish and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research (SNIFFER) Project WFD72A. Edinburgh: SNIFFER
   Google Scholar
• Pocock MJO, Chapman DS, Sheppard LJ, Roy HE. 2014. Choosing and using citizen science: a guide to when and how to use citizen science to monitor biodiversity and the environment. Wallingford: Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Raven PJ, George JJ. 1989. Recovery by riffle macroinvertebrates in a river after a major accidental spillage of chlorpyrifos. Environ Pollut. 59:55–70. doi:10.1016/0269-7491(89)90021-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins L, Burt TP, Bracken LJ, Boardman J, Thompson DBA. 2017. Making water policy work in the United Kingdom: A case study of practical approaches to strengthening complex, multi-tiered systems of water governance. Environ Sci Policy. 71:41–55. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy HE, Pocock MJO, Preston CD, Roy DB, Savage J, Tweddle JC, Robinson LD. 2012. Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. Wallingford: Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF.
   Google Scholar
• Shuker LJ, Gurnell AM, Wharton G, Gurnell DJ, England J, Finn Leeming BF, Beach E. 2017. MoRPh: a citizen science tool for monitoring and appraising physical habitat changes in rivers. Water Environ J. 31(3):418–424. doi:10.1111/wej.12259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shupe SM. 2016. High resolution stream water quality assessment in the Vancouver, British Columbia region: a citizen science study. Sci Total Environ. 603-604:745–759. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MJ, Kay WR, Edward DHD, Papas PJ, Richardson KSJ, Simpson JC, Pinder AM, Cale DJ, Horwitz PHJ, Davis JA, et al. 1999. AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biol. 41:269–282. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00430.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struthers, WAK. 1997. From Manchester Docks to Salford Quays: ten years of environmental improvements in the Mersey Basin Campaign. Water Environ J. 11(1):1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.1997.tb00081.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson MSA, Bankier C, Bell T, Dumbrell AJ, Gray C, Ledger ME, Lehmann K, Mckew BA, Sayer CD, Shelley F, et al. 2016. Gene-to-ecosystem impacts of a catastrophic pesticide spill: testing a multilevel bioassessment approach in a river ecosystem. Freshwr Biol. 61(12):2037–2050. doi:10.1111/fwb.12676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill I, Loiselle S, Clymans W, van Noordwijk CGE. 2019. How citizen scientists can enrich freshwater science as contributors, collaborators, and co-creators. Freshwater Sci. 38(2):231–235. doi:10.1086/703378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UKTAG. 2008. The water framework directive. UK environmental standards and conditions (phase 1) final report. Stirling:Water Framework Directive United Kingdom Technical Advisory Group.
   Google Scholar
• UKTAG. 2014. UKTAG river assessment method: benthic invertebrate fauna. Stirling:Water Framework Directive United Kingdom Technical Advisory Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace JB, Webster JR. 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annu Rev Entomol 41:115–139. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley WJ, Hawkes HA. 1996. A computer-based reappraisal of the Biological Monitoring Working Party scores using data from the 1990 river quality survey of England and Wales. Water Res.. 30(9):2086–2094. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(96)00013-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley WJ, Hawkes HA. 1997. A computer-based development of the biological monitoring working party score system incorporating abundance rating, site type and indicator value. Water Res. 31(2):201–210. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00249-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber MA, Ringold PL. 2019. River metrics by the public, for the public. PLoS ONE. 14(5):e0214986. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AE, White KN, Hendry K. 2010. Manchester ship canal and salford quays: industrial legacy and ecological restoration. In: Batty L, editor. Ecological reviews: ecology of industrial pollution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 276–308. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511805561.015.
   Google Scholar
• Wood R, Handley J, Kidd S. 1999. Sustainable development and institutional design: the example of the Mersey Basin Campaign. J Environ Plann Man. 42(3):341–354. doi:10.1080/09640569911127.
   Google Scholar