Computerized detection of breast cancer in digital mammograms

References

• Cheng HD, Shi XJ, Min R, et al. Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognit. 2006(4);39:646–668.10.1016/j.patcog.2005.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HD, Kallergi M, Clarke LP, et al. Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995;14(3):565–576.10.1109/42.414622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Cheng HD, Hu L, et al. Detection and classification of masses in breast ultrasound images. Digit Signal Process. 2010;20(3):824–836.10.1016/j.dsp.2009.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu K, Gao X, Li F. Detection of suspicious lesions by adaptive thresholding based on multi-resolution analysis in mammograms. IEEE Trans. Instrumentation Measurement. 2011;60(2):462–472.10.1109/TIM.2010.2051060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zheng C, Lin P. Fuzzy clustering with spatial constraints for image thresholding. Optica Applicata. 2005;35(4):943–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celia V, Tahoces PG, Mendez AJ, et al. Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms. Comput Biol Medicine. 2007;37:214–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Giger ML, Li H, et al. A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. Med Physics. 2007;34(11):4180–4193.10.1118/1.2790837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí J, Freixenet J, Muñoz X, et al. Active region segmentation of mammographic masses based on texture, Contour, and Shape Features. In Proceeding of First lberian conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Spain; 2003.10.1007/b12122
   Google Scholar
• Zhang XP, Desai MD. Segmentation of bright targets using wavelets and adaptive thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2001;10(7):1020–1030.10.1109/83.931096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallat S. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence. 1989;11(7):674–693.10.1109/34.192463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao Y, Hu Q, Qian G, et al. Thresholding based on variance and intensity contrast. Pattern Recognit. 2007;40(2):596–608.10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berber T, Alpkocak A, Balci P, et al. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013;110(2):150–159.10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffery ZA, Zaheeruddin, Laxman S. Computerized segmentation of suspicious lesions in digital mammograms. Comput Methods Biomechan Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2014. doi:10.1080/21681163.2014.982304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kom G, Tiedeu A, Kom M. Automated detection of masses in mammograms by local adaptive thresholding. Comput Biol Medicine. 2007;37(1):37–48.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurt B, Nabiyev VV, Turhan K. A novel automatic suspicious mass regions identification using Havrda & Charvat entropy and Otsu’s N thresholding. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2014;114(3):349–360.10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharcanski J, Jung CR. Denoising and enhancing digital mammographic images for visual screening. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2006;30(4):243–254.10.1016/j.compmedimag.2006.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitra IK, Nag S, Bandyopadhyay SK. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012;107(2):175–188.10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira DC, Ramos RP, do Nascimento MZ. Segmentation and detection of breast cancer in mammograms combining wavelet analysis and genetic algorithm. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;114(1):88–101.10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram M, Ramar K, Arumugam N, et al. Histogram modified local contrast enhancement for mammogram images. Appl Soft Comput. 2011;11(8):5809–5816.10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheeruddin, Jaffery ZA, Singh L. Detection and shape feature extraction of breasttumor in mammograms. Proceedings of the World congress on Engineering. London, U.K; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Soille P. Morphological image analysis: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Springer; 2004.10.1007/978-3-662-05088-0
   Google Scholar
• Daubechies I. Ten lectures on wavelets. CBMS, SIAM. 1994;61(198–202):254–256.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent L. Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms. IEEE Trans Image Processing. 1993;2(2):176–201.10.1109/83.217222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffery ZA, Zaheeruddin, Singh L. Performance analysis of image segmentation methods for the detection of masses in mammograms. Int J Comput Appl. 2013;82(2):44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt U. Root images of median filters. J Math Imaging Vis. 2013;19:63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn J. A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well separated clusters. J Cybern. 1974;3:32–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ostu N. A threshold selection method from gray level histogram. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9(1):62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suckling J, Astley S, Betal D, et al. Mammographic image analysis society mini mammographic database; 2005. Available from: http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/ipa/pix/mias/.
   Google Scholar
• Timp S, Karssemeijer N. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. Med Phys. 2004;31(5):958–971.10.1118/1.1688039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Liu H, Song E. Marker-controlled watershed for lesion segmentation in mammograms. J. Digit Imaging. 2011;24(5):754–763.10.1007/s10278-011-9365-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basheer NM, Mohammed MH. Segmentation of breast masses in digital mammograms using adaptive median filtering and texture analysis. Int J Recent Technol Eng. 2013;2(1):39–43.
   Google Scholar