Automated extraction and discrimination of open land areas from IRS-1C LISS III imagery

References

• Kuemmerle T, Erb K, Meyfroidt P, et al. Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2013;5(5):484–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Sawaya KE, Loeffelholz BC, et al. Land cover classification and change analysis of the twin cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area by multitemporal landsat remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ. 2005;98(2):317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Yang X. Monitoring land changes in an urban area using satellite imagery, gis and landscape metrics. Appl Geogr. 2015;56:42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Jezek K. Automated extraction of coastline from satellite imagery by integrating canny edge detection and locally adaptive thresholding methods. Int J Remote Sens. 2004;25(5):937–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle T, Radeloff VC, Perzanowski K, et al. Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in eastern europe using a hybrid classification technique. Remote Sens Environ. 2006;103(4):449–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa G, Sochen N, Zeevi YY. Forward-and-backward diffusion processes for adaptive image enhancement and denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2002;11(7):689–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai A, Yezzi A, Willsky AS. Curve evolution implementation of the mumford-shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2001;10(8):1169–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horning N. Random forests: an algorithm for image classification and generation of continuous fields data sets. New York: Ned Horning; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Maragos P. Partial differential equations in image analysis: continuous modeling, discrete processing. Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1998), 9th European; IEEE; 1998. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Liu P, Huang F, Li G, et al. Remote-sensing image denoising using partial differential equations and auxiliary images as priors. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2012;9(3):358–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parveen R, Kulkarni S, Mytri V. Low level vision processing and vegetation extraction using irs-1c liss iii image. International Conference on Signal and Information Processing (IConSIP); IEEE; 2016. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jhonnerie R, Siregar VP, Nababan B, et al. Random forest classification for mangrove land cover mapping using landsat 5 tm and alos palsar imageries. Procedia Environ Sci. 2015;24:215–221.
   Google Scholar
• Ghebrezgabher MG, Yang T, Yang X, et al. Extracting and analyzing forest and woodland cover change in eritrea based on landsat data using supervised classification. Egypt J R Sens Space Sci. 2016;19(1):37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perona P, Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1990;12(7):629–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guichard F, Moisan L, Morel JM. A review of pde models in image processing and image analysis. J de Phys IV (Proceedings). 2002;12:137–154. EDP sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Chao SM, Tsai DM. An improved anisotropic diffusion model for detail-and edge-preserving smoothing. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2010;31(13):2012–2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettahar S, Stambouli AB. An efficient pde framework for satellite image classification. Revue des Energies Renouvelables. 2010;13(3):369–377.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf A, Kerle N. Object-oriented mapping of landslides using random forests. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115(10):2564–2577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JJ, Siu WC, Liu TR. Fast image interpolation via random forests. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015;24(10):3232–3245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 1996;24(2):123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarabalka Y, Chanussot J, Benediktsson JA. Segmentation and classification of hyperspectral images using watershed transformation. Pattern Recognit. 2010;43(7):2367–2379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SU, Chung SY, Park RH. A comparative performance study of several global thresholding techniques for segmentation. Comput Vis Graph Image Process. 1990;52(2):171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Wu B, Yan N, et al. Water body mapping method with hj-1a/b satellite imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2011;13(3):428–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman GG. Vegetation indices from avhrr: an update and future prospects. Remote Sens Environ. 1991;35(2–3):121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from tm imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 2003;24(3):583–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9(1):62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal NR, Pal SK. A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recognit. 1993;26(9):1277–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gislason PO, Benediktsson JA, Sveinsson JR. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2006;27(4):294–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam K, Jashimuddin M, Nath B, et al. Land use classification and change detection by using multi-temporal remotely sensed imagery: the case of Chunati wildlife sanctuary, Bangladesh. Egypt J R Sens Space Sci. 2017;21:37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 1991;37(1):35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody GM. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ. 2002;80(1):185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorn J, Rabe A, Radeloff VC. Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring landsat satellite images. Remote Sens Environ. 2009;113(5):957–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaya KE, Olmanson LG, Heinert NJ, et al. Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales: land and water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 2003;88(1):144–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar