Instantiation of the multi-viewpoints ontology from a resource

References

• Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The semantic web. J Sci Am. 2001;284(5):34–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Jain S. Ontologies as a semantic model in IoT. Int J Comput Appl. 2018;13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2018.1504461.
   Google Scholar
• Abecker A, Van-Elst L. Ontologies for knowledge management. In: Staab S, Studer R, editors. Handbook on ontologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 435–454.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber TR. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int J Human Comp Stud. 1995;43(5/6):907–928. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy NF, McGuinness DL. Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University; 2001. p. 1–25. (Technical Report: SMI-2001-0880).
   Google Scholar
• Guarino N. Formal ontology and information systems. 1st International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS98); 1998 Jun 6–8; Trento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston PH, editor. The psychology of computer vision. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1975. p. 211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Mariño O. Raisonnement classificatoire dans une représentation à objets multi-points de vue [dissertation]. Grenoble (France): University of Joseph Fourier; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bach TL. Construction d’un Web sémantique multi-points de vue [dissertation]. Sophia Antipolis- (France): Mines ParisTech (École des Mines de Paris); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hemam M, Boufaida Z. Mvp-OWL: a multi-viewpoints ontology language for the semantic web. Int J Reason Based Intell Syst. 2011;3(3/4):147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Dieng R, Corby O, Grandon F, et al. Méthodes et outils pour la gestion des connaissances: une approche pluridisciplinaire du knowledge management [Methods and tools for knowledge management: a multidisciplinary approach to knowledge management]. 2nd ed. Paris: Dunod; 2005; Chapter 6, Gestion de multiples points de vue [Management of multi viewpoints]; p. 372.
   Google Scholar
• Falquet G, Mottaz CL. Navigation hypertexte dans une ontologie multi-points de vue. Conference NîmesTIC'2001; 2001 Dec 12–14; Nîmes, France; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bouquet P, Giunchiglia F, van-Harmelen F, et al. Contextualizing ontologies. J Web Semant. 2004;1(4):325–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2004.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Bouquet P, Giunchiglia F, Van Harmelen F, et al. C-OWL: contextualizing ontologies. In: Fensel D, Sycara K, Mylopoulos J, editors. Proceedings of Second International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2003); 2003 Oct 20–23; Sanibel Island, FL, USA. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2003. p. 164–179.
   Google Scholar
• Borgida A, Serafini L. Distributed description logics: assimilating information from peer sources. J Data Semant. 2003;1(7):153–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39733-5_7
   Google Scholar
• Benslimane D, Arara A, Falquet G, et al. Contextual ontologies: motivations, challenges, and solutions. In: Yakhno T, Neuhold E, editors. Advances in Information Systems; 2006 Oct 18–20; Izmir, Turkey. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 168–176.
   Google Scholar
• Benslimane D, Vangenot C, Roussey C, et al. Multirepresentation in ontologies. In: Kalinichenko L, Manthey R, Thalheim B, et al, editors. Proceedings of 7th East-European Conference on Advances in Databases and Informations Systems (ADBIS-2003); 2003 Sep 3–6; Dresden, Germany. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2003. p. 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zhitomirsky-Geffet M, Erez ES, Judit BI. Toward multiviewpoint ontology construction by collaboration of non-experts and crowdsourcing: The case of the effect of diet on health. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2017;68(3):681–694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oprea M. A case study of collaborative ontology development for higher education. Int J Artif Intell. 2016;14(2):70–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hemam M. Développement des ontologies multi-points de vue: une approche basée sur la logique dedescriptions [dissertation]. Constantine (Algeria): University of Mentouri Constantine; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• WordNet FC. An electronic lexical database. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg D, Humphrey B, McCray A. The unified medical language system. In Methods Inf Med. 1993;32(4):281–291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1634945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakker D, Osman T, Lakin P. GATE JAPE Grammar Tutorial. General Architecture for Text Engineering (GATE) [Internet]. Sheffield (UK): The University of Sheffield; 2009 [cited 2009 Jul 17]. Available from: https://gate.ac.uk/sale/thakker-jape-tutorial/.
   Google Scholar
• Thiam M. Annotation sémantique de documents Semi-structurés pour la recherche d’information [dissertation]. Berger (France): University of Paris-Sud, Gaston; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho H, Salhi A. A string metric based on a one-to-one greedy matching algorithm. Res Comp Sci. 2006;19(17):171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Levenstein A. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov Phys Dokl. 1966;10(8):707–710.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen VT, Sallaberry C, Gaio M. Mesure de la similarité entre termes et labels de concepts ontologiques. In: Berrut C, editor. Proceedings of 10th French Information Retrieval Conference; 2013 Apr 3–5; Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Wadern (Germany): dblp (Computer Science bibliography); 2013. p. 415–430.
   Google Scholar
• Yu J, Li D, Hao S, et al. Applying ontology and VSM for similarity measure of test questions. TELKOMNIKA Indones J Electr Eng. 2014;12(9):6932–6939.
   Google Scholar
• Biniz M, ElAyachi R, Fakir M. Ontology matching using BabelNet dictionary and word sense disambiguation algorithms. Indones J Electr Eng Comp Sci. 2017;5(1):196–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v5.i1.pp196-205
   Google Scholar
• Bohring H, Auer S. Mapping XML to OWL ontologies. In: Jantke KP, Faehnrich KP, Wittig WS, editors. Proceedings of Leipziger Informatik-Tage (LIT 2005); 2005 Sep 21–23; Leipzig, Berlin: Springer-Verlag (Lecture Notes in Informatics); 2005. p. 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Djezzar M, Boufaida Z. Ontological classification of individuals: a multi-viewpoints approach. Int J Reas Based Intell Syst. 2015;7(3/4):276–285.
   Google Scholar
• Djakhdjakha L, Hemam M, Boufaida Z. Towards a representation for multi-viewpoints ontology alignments. Int J Metadata Semant Ontol. 2014;9(2):91–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2014.060324
   Google Scholar
• Wu JZ, Yu X, Gao W. Distance computation of ontology vector for ontology similarity measuring and ontologymapping. J Differ Equ Appl. 2017;23(1/2):30–41. Special Issue in honour of Garcia-Laencina. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2016.1148147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan K, Krishnan R, Muthumari A. A semantic-based ontology mapping – information retrieval for mobile learning resources. Int J Comput Appl. 2017;39(3):169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett D, Broekstra J. SPARQL Query Results XML Format (Second Edition). w3.org [Internet]. W3C Recommendation; 2013 [updated 2013 Mar 21; cited 2013 Mar 30]. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20130321.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner R, Flesca S, Gottlob G. Visual web information extraction with lixto. 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2001 Sep 11–14; Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Handschuh S, Staab S, Ciravegna F. S-cream-semi-automatic creation of metadata. In: Gómez-Pérez A, Benjamins VR, editors. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web; 2002 Oct 1–4; Sigüenza, Spain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2002. p. 358–372.
   Google Scholar
• Carme J, Gilleron R, Lemay A, et al. Interactive learning of node selecting tree transducers, machine learning. Mach Learn J. 2007;66(1):33–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-9613-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euzenat J. Eight questions about semantic web annotations. IEEE Intell Syst. 2002;17(2):55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciravegna F, Wilks Y. Designing adaptive information extraction for the semantic web in Amilcare. In: Handschuh S, Staab S, editors. Annotation for the semantic web. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2003. p. 112–127.
   Google Scholar
• Davulcu H, Vadrevu S, Nagarajan S. Ontominer: automated metadata and instance mining from news websites. Int J Web Grid Serv. 2005;1(2):196–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWGS.2005.008320
   Google Scholar
• Petridis K, Anastasopoulos D, Saathoff C, et al. M-ontomat-annotizer: image annotation linking ontologies and multimedia low-level features. In: Gabrys B, Howlett RJ, Jain LC, editors. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems; 2006 Oct 9–11; Bournemouth, United Kingdom. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 633–640.
   Google Scholar
• Rahayu SB. Ranking algorithm for semantic document annotations. Int J Inf Retr Res. 2012;2(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sitthisarn S, Bahoh B. Towards automatic semantic annotation of Thai official correspondence: Leave of absence case study. In: Boonkrong S, Unger H, Meesad P, editors. Recent Advances in Information and Communication Technology; 2014 May 8–9; Angsana Laguna, Phuket, Thailand. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2014. p. 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Uren V, Cimiano P, Iria J, et al. Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art. J Web Semant. 2006;4(1):14–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpouli S. Annotating similes in literary texts. In: Gardent C, Retoré C, editors. The 12th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2017); 2017 Sep 19–22; Montpellier, France. Wadern (Germany): dblp (Computer Science bibliography); 2017. p. 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Li J, Hong M, et al. Semantics enabled intelligent semi-structured document processor. In: Yuan Y, Wu X, Lu Y, editors. Trustworthy Computing and Services; 2014 Nov 28–29; Beijing, China. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2014. p. 328–344.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvain T, Yannick T. Classes d’annotation pour l’annotation sémantique. International Workshop Ontotexte ‘Ontologies et Textes; 2007 Oct 10; Sophia Antipolis, France.
   Google Scholar
• Alani H, Sanghee K, Millard DE, et al. Automatic ontology-based knowledge extraction from web documents. IEEE Intell Syst. 2003;18(1):14–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2003.1179189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hignette G, Buche P, Dibie-Barthélemy D, et al. Semantic annotation of data tables using a domain ontology. In: Corruble V, Takeda M, Suzuki E, editors. Discovery Science, V. Corruble; 2007 Oct 1–4; Sendai, Japan. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 253–258.
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Xu B, Lu J, et al. Bridge ontology: a multi ontologies-based approach for semantic annotation. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci. 2004;9(5):617–622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02831652
   Google Scholar
• Hemam M, Djezzar M, Boufaida Z. Multi-viewpoint ontological representation of composite concepts: a description logics-based approach. Int J Intell Inf Database Syst. 2017;10(1/2):51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hemam M. An extension of the ontology web language with multi-viewpoints and probabilistic reasoning. Int J Adv Intell Paradig. 2018;10(3):247–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAIP.2018.090789
   Google Scholar
• Tylecek R, Fisher RB. Consistent semantic annotation of outdoor datasets via 2D/3D label transfer. Sensors. 2018;18(7):2249–2269. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yordanova K, Krüger F. Creating and exploring semantic annotation for behaviour analysis. Sensors. 2018;18(9):2778–2799. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar