Empowering citizens by a blockchain-Based Robinson list

References

• Cirillo A, Mauro A, Pennino D, et al. Decentralized robinson list. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems; CryBlock '20, Association for Computing Machinery; New York, NY: 2020. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• 35+ phone spam statistics for 2017, 2018, 2019. Available from: https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/phone-spam-statistics/, Last accessed April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commissionstop unwanted robocalls and texts. Available from: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/stop-unwanted-robocalls-and-texts, Last accessed February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• ROK Ministry of Economy and Finance flattening the curve on covid-19. Available from: http://www.undp.org/content/seoul_policy_center/en/home/presscenter/articles/2019/flattening-the-curve-on-covid-19.html, Last accessed April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research. Spam flagging and call blocking and its impact on survey research, February 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Registro pubblico delle opposizioni. Available from: http://www.registrodelleopposizioni.it/en, Last accessed April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt P, Von dem Bussche A. The EU general data protection regulation (GDPR). A Practical Guide, 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kakarlapudi PV, Mahmoud QH. A systematic review of blockchain for consent management. Healthcare. 2021;9(2):137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempest A. Robinson lists for efficient direct marketing. International Direct Marketing. Springer; 2007. p. 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Mamo N, Martin GM, Desira M, et al. Dwarna: a blockchain solution for dynamic consent in biobanking. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2019;28:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran K, Ilfrich P, Liffman D, et al. Double-blind consent-driven data sharing on blockchain. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E); IEEE; 2018. p. 385–391.
   Google Scholar
• Androulaki E, Barger A, Bortnikov V, et al. Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference; 2018. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rantos K, Drosatos G, Demertzis K, et al. Advocate: a consent management platform for personal data processing in the iot using blockchain technology. International Conference on Security for Information Technology and Communications; Springer; 2018. p. 300–313.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma G, Kalra S. Advanced multi-factor user authentication scheme for e-governance applications in smart cities. Int J Computers Appl. 2019;41(4):312–327.
   Google Scholar
• Ametepe W, Wang C, Ocansey SK, et al. Data provenance collection and security in a distributed environment: a survey. Int J Computers Appl. 2021;43(1):11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vaithyasubramanian S, Lalitha D, Kirubhashankar CK. Enhancing website security against bots, spam and web attacks using lcaptcha. Int J Computers Appl. 2019: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sun N, Lin G, Qiu J, et al. Near real-time twitter spam detection with machine learning techniques. Int J Computers Appl. 2020;1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Iso/iec 24760:2019 it security and privacy-a framework for identity management. New York, 1994. Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Mühle A, Grüner A, Gayvoronskaya T, et al. A survey on essential components of a self-sovereign identity. Computer Sci Rev. 2018;30:80–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Zhang N, Lou W, et al. A survey of distributed consensus protocols for blockchain networks. IEEE Commun Surveys & Tutorials. 2020;22(2):1432–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamassia R. Authenticated data structures. European symposium on algorithms; p. 2–5. Springer; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Algorand Official Documentation, exploring features: Assets. Available from: https://developer.algorand.org/docs/features/asa/, Last accessed May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Victor F, Lüders BK. Measuring ethereum-based ERC20 token networks. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security; Springer; 2019. p. 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Pynacl – public key encryption. Available from: https://pynacl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/public/, Last accessed May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein DJ. Cryptography in nacl. Networking and Cryptography Library. 2009;3:385.
   Google Scholar
• Langley A, Hamburg M, Turner S. Elliptic Curves for Security. RFC 7748, January 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Decentralized robinson list. Available from: https://gitlab.com/amauro/fob_robinson_list/-/tree/journal_version, Last accessed May 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Algorand: The first pure proof of stake blockchain platform. Available from: https://www.algorand.com/, Last accessed May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ethereum wiki project. On sharding blockchains. Available from: https://eth.wiki/sharding/Sharding-FAQs [Accessed 5 May 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Monte GD, Pennino D, Pizzonia M. Scaling blockchains without giving up decentralization and security: A solution to the blockchain scalability trilemma. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems, CryBlock '20; New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. p. 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Micali S, Chen J. Algorand: A secure and efficient distributed ledger. Theoretical Computer Science. Vol. 777, 2019, P. 155–183.
   Google Scholar
• Algorand Official Documentation: exploring features: Accounts. Available from: https://developer.algorand.org/docs/features/accounts/create/, Last accessed May 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pennino D, Pizzonia M, Vitaletti A, et al. Binding of endpoints to identifiers by on-chain proofs. 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC); 2020. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar