Two image quality assessment methods based on evidential modeling and uncertainty: application to automatic iris identification systems

References

• Nomir O. Iris biometrics: human identification using force field. Int J Comput Appl. 2011;33(1):41–48. doi:10.2316/Journal.202.2011.1.202-2985.
   Google Scholar
• Jahan S, Chowdhury M, Islam R. Robust user authentication model for securing electronic healthcare system using fingerprint biometrics. Int J Comput Appl. 2019;41(3):233–242. doi:10.1080/1206212X.2018.1437651 .
   Google Scholar
• Hossain A, Al Hasan A. Improving cloud data security through hybrid verification technique based on biometrics and encryption system. Int J Comput Appl. 2022;44(5):455–464. doi:10.1080/1206212X.2020.1809177 .
   Google Scholar
• Dempster AP. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. In: Classic Works of the Dempster–Shafer Theory of Belief Functions; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Taroun A, Yang JB. Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence: potential usage for decision making and risk analysis in construction project management. Built Hum Environ Rev. Volume 4, 155-166, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Oh T.H. JPEG2000 and JPEG: image quality comparison of compressed medical modalities. Int J Comput Appl. 2010;32(4):393–398. doi:10.2316/Journal.202.2010.4.202-1503 .
   Google Scholar
• Proença H. Quality assessment of degraded iris images acquired in the visible wavelength. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2010;6(1):82–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makinana S, Malumedzha T, Nelwamondo FV. Quality parameter assessment on iris images. J Artif Intell Soft Comput Res. 2014;4(1):21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Garea-Llano E, Morales-Gonzalez A. Framework for biometric iris recognition in video, by deep learning and quality assessment of the iris-pupil region. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2021;1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Tan T, Sun Z, et al. Robust and fast assessment of iris image quality. In: International Conference on Biometrics; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 464–471.
   Google Scholar
• Kang BJ, Park KR. A new multi-unit iris authentication based on quality assessment and score level fusion for mobile phones. Mach Vis Appl. 2010;21(4):541–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao K, Tian Y, Lu Y, et al. Quality assessment-based iris and face fusion recognition with dynamic weight. Vis Comput. 2021;1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Pedersen M, Charrier C, et al. Can no-reference image quality metrics assess visible wavelength iris sample quality? In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; Beijing, China; 2017. p. 3530–3534.
   Google Scholar
• Xinwei L, Christophe C, Marius P, et al. Performance evaluation of no-reference image quality metrics for visible wavelength iris biometric images. In: Proceedings of the 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2018); Rome, Italy: 2018. p. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Han M, Wan H. The fast iris image clarity evaluation based on Brenner. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Instrumentation and Measurement, Sensor Network and Automation (IMSNA); Toronto, ON, Canada: 2013. p. 300–302.
   Google Scholar
• Starovoitov V, Golińska AK, Predko-Maliszewska A, et al. No-reference image quality assessment for iris biometrics. In: Image Processing and Communications Challenges 4; Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2013. p. 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmüller T, Christopoulos E, Fehrenbach K, et al. Recompression effects in iris recognition. Image Vis Comput. 2017;58:142–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalka ND, Zuo J, Schmid NA, et al. Estimating and fusing quality factors for iris biometric images. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum. 2010;40(3):509–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenadeleh M, Pedersen M, Saupe D. Blind quality assessment of iris images acquired in visible light for biometric recognition. Sensors. 2020;20(5):1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happold M. Learning to predict match scores for iris image quality assessment. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics; IEEE; 2014. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Daugman J, Downing C. Iris image quality metrics with veto power and nonlinear importance tailoring. In: Iris and Periocular Biometric Recognition; IET Pub; 2016. p. 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kallel IK. Contribution à l'identification d'individus par l'iris [PhD]. in Electrical Engineering from the National Engineering School of Sfax, Tunisia; (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Karperien A, Jelinek HF, Milosevic NT, et al. Reviewing lacunarity analysis and classification of microglia in neuroscience. In: 8th European Conference on Mathematical and Theoretical Biology; 2011. European Society for Mathematical and Theoretical Biology (ESMTB),  DOI: 10.13140/2.1.3576.6082
   Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;6:610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Zhan J, Zhou D. A method to determine generalized basic probability assignment in the open world. Math Probl Eng. 2019;2016(2):1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3878634
   Google Scholar
• Fei L, Xia J, Feng Y, et al. A novel method to determine basic probability assignment in Dempster–Shafer theory and its application in multi-sensor information fusion. Int J Distrib Sens Netw. 2019;15:7Article ID 155014771986587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Deng Y. A method to determine basic probability assignment in the open world and its application in data fusion and classification. Appl Intell. 2017;46(4):934–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Deng Y, Peng J. A new method to determine BPA in evidence theory. J Comput. 2011;6(6):1162–1167.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Cai R. An improved expression for information quality of basic probability assignment and its application in fault diagnosis. TechRxiv, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Cai R. An improved expression for information quality of basic probability assignment and its application in target recognition. Soft Comput. 2021;25(8):6681–6690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y. Uncertainty measure in evidence theory. Sci China Inf Sci. 2020;63(11):1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang X, Song Y. Uncertainty measure in evidence theory with its applications. Appl Intell. 2018;48(7):1672–1688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Zhou D, Xu S, et al. A weighted belief entropy-based uncertainty measure for multi-sensor data fusion. Sensors. 2017;17(4):928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietterich TG. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 1998;10(7):1895–1923. doi:10.1162/089976698300017197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1927;22(158):209–212. doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953.
   Google Scholar