Is democratic nomination good for women's candidacy? Examining the case of Taiwan

References

• Andersen, K., & Thorson, S. J. (1984). Congressional turnover and the election of women. The Western Political Quarterly, 37(1), 143–156. doi: 10.2307/448330
   Google Scholar
• Batto, N. F. (2014). Was Taiwan's electoral reform good for women? SNTV, MMM, gender quotas, and female representation. Issues & Studies, 50(2), 39–76. Retrieved from http://issues.nccu.edu.tw/
   Google Scholar
• Baum, J., & Robinson, J. A. (1999). Party primaries in Taiwan: Trends, conditions, and projections in candidate selection. Occasional Papers Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 155(6), 1–39. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu
   Google Scholar
• Bille, L. (2001). Democratizing a democratic procedure: Myth or reality? Candidate selection in Western European parties, 1960–1990. Party Politics, 7(3), 363–380. doi: 10.1177/1354068801007003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnegård, E., & Kenny, M. (2015). Revealing the ‘Secret Garden’: The informal dimensions of political recruitment. Politics & Gender, 11(4), 748–753. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X15000471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, B. (1994). A woman’s place is in the house: Campaigning for congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417–439. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. I., & Sanbonmats, K. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. J. (1994). Women as candidates in American politics (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caul, M. (1999). Women’s representation in parliament: The role of political parties. Party Politics, 5(1), 79–98. doi: 10.1177/1354068899005001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., Rosenbluth, F. M., & Thies, M. F. (1999). Electoral reform and the fate of factions: The case of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party. British Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 33–56. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, R., Welch, S., & Clark, J. (1994). Women, elections, and representation (2nd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Schmich, L. K. (2006). Implementation of political party gender quotas: Evidence from the German länder 1990–2000. Party Politics, 12(2), 211–232. doi: 10.1177/1354068806061338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, K. (2015). Encouragement is not enough: Addressing social and structural barriers to female recruitment. Politics & Gender, 11(4), 759–765. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X15000495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell, D. (2006). Democratization of candidate selection in Taiwanese political parties. Journal of Electoral Studies, 13(2), 167–198. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436039
   Google Scholar
• Fell, D. (2013). Impact of candidate selection systems on election results: Evidence from Taiwan before and after the change in electoral systems. The China Quarterly, 213(1), 152–171. doi: 10.1017/S0305741012001282
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Oxley, Z. (2003). Gender stereotyping in state executive elections: Candidate selection and success. The Journal of Politics, 65(3), 833–850. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., & Marsh, M. (Eds.). (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat, G. (2006). The influence of candidate selection methods on legislatures and legislators: Theoretical propositions, methodological suggestions and empirical evidence. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(3–4), 366–385. doi: 10.1080/13572330600875647
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within parties: Candidate selection methods and their political consequences. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henig, R., & Henig, S. (2001). Women and political power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, M. (2009). Whatever the party asks of me: Women’s political representation in Chile’s Unión Demócrata Independiente. Politics & Gender, 5(3), 377–408. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X09990183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, M. (2012). Selecting women, electing women: Political representation and candidate selection in Latin America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Htun, M. N., & Jones, M. P. (2002). Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: Electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In N. Craske & M. Molyneux (Eds.), Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America (pp. 32–56). New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. L. (2001). Cong funü baozhang ming'e dao xingbie bili yuanze: liangxing gongzhi de lilun yu shijian. Wenti yu yanjiu [from reserved seats for women to the gender quota system: Theory and practice of gender parity in politics]. Issues and Studies, 40(3), 69–82. Retrieved from from http://issues.nccu.edu.tw/
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. L. (2015). Gender quotas in Taiwan: The impact of global diffusion. Politics & Gender, 11(1), 207–217. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X14000634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. P. (1998). Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women. Comparative Political Studies, 31(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1177/0010414098031001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. P. (2004). Quota legislation and the election of women: Learning from the Costa Rican experience. The Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1203–1223. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3816.2004.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, O. (2009). Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests? Electoral Studies, 28(2), 240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittilson, M. C. (2006). Challenging parties, changing parliaments: Women and elected office in contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, E. S., & Pekkane, R. J. (2010). The rise and fall of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party. The Journal of Asian Studies, 69(1), 5–15. doi: 10.1017/S0021911809992555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L. (2004). Gender quotas as a global phenomenon: Actors and strategies in quota adoptions. European Political Science, 3(3), 59–65. doi: 10.1057/eps.2004.18
   Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. (2015). Female candidates and legislators. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 349–366. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J., & Fox, R. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J., & Pearson, K. (2008). The primary reason for women’s underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 67–82. doi: 10.1017/S002238160708005X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. H. (2006). The politics of reform in Japan and Taiwan. Journal of Democracy, 17(2), 118–131. doi: 10.1353/jod.2006.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J., & Norris, P. (1993). Gender and party politics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lundell, K. (2004). Determinants of candidate selection: The degree of centralization in comparative perspective. Party Politics, 10(1), 25–47. doi: 10.1177/1354068804039119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncrief, G. F., Squire, P., & Jewell, M. E. (2001). Who runs for the legislature? Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Narud, H. M., Pedersen, M. N., & Valen, H. (Eds.). (2002). Party sovereignty and citizen control: Selecting candidates for parliamentary elections in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Niven, D. (1998). Party elites and women candidates: The shape of bias. Women & Politics, 19(2), 57–80. doi: 10.1300/J014v19n02_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niven, D. (2006). Throwing your hat out of the ring: Negative recruitment and the gender imbalance in state legislative candidacy. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 473–489. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X06060120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2001). The political glass ceiling: Gender, strategy, and incumbency in U.S. House elections, 1978–1998. In K. O’Connor (Ed.), Women and congress: Running, winning and ruling (pp. 59–78). New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2005). When women run against women: The hidden influence of female incumbents in elections to the U.S. House of representatives, 1956–2002. Politics & Gender, 1(1), 39–63. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X05050026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, P., & Hazan, R. Y. (2001). Democratizing candidate selection: Causes and consequences. Party Politics, 7(3), 267–275. doi: 10.1177/1354068801007003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat, G. (2007). Candidate selection: The choice before the choice. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 157–170. Retrieved from https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat, G. (2008). Which candidate selection method is more democratic? Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/05n9f4bn
   Google Scholar
• Rahat, G., & Hazan, R. Y. (2001). Candidate selection methods: An analytical framework. Party Politics, 7(3), 297–322. doi: 10.1177/1354068801007003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, S. R., & Thies, M. F. (2003). The consequences of electoral reform in Japan. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, 380–403. doi: 10.1093/019925768x.003.0018
   Google Scholar
• Rule, W. (1981). Why women don’t run: The critical contextual factors in women’s legislative recruitment. The Western Political Quarterly, 34(1), 60–77. doi: 10.1177/106591298103400106
   Google Scholar
• Rule, W. (1987). Electoral systems, contextual factors and women’s opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. The Western Political Quarterly, 40(3), 477–498. doi: 10.1177/106591298704000307
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Political parties and the recruitment of women to state legislatures. The Journal of Politics, 64(3), 791–809. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, K. (2006). Do parties know that “women win”? Party leader beliefs about women’s electoral chances. Politics & Gender, 2, 431–450. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X06060132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. D. (2009). The election of women in list PR systems: Testing the conventional wisdom. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2005). The incumbency disadvantage and women’s election to legislative office. Electoral Studies, 24(2), 227–244. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, R., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Shair-Rosenfield, S., & Hinojosa, M. (2014). Does female incumbency reduce gender bias in elections? Evidence from Chile. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 837–850. doi: 10.1177/1065912914550044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, S. Y. (2014). Revisiting constituency service and legislative work of Taiwan’s legislators: A comparison before and after the reform of electoral system. Soochow Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 65–116. Retrieved from http://www2.scu.edu.tw/politics/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. M., & Tsutsumi, H. (2016). Candidate selection methods and policy cohesion in parties: The impact of open recruitment in Japan. Party Politics, 22(3), 339–353. doi: 10.1177/1354068814549347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies, D. C., & Kaiser, A. (2014). Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics, 20(4), 576–590. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studlar, D. T., & McAllister, I. (1991). Political recruitment to the Australian legislature: Toward an explanation of women’s electoral disadvantages. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(2), 467–485. doi: 10.1177/106591299104400214
   Google Scholar
• Tan, N. (2015). Introduction: Quotas and non-quota strategies in East Asia. Politics & Gender, 11(1), 171–175. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X14000622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, A. (1996). Political parties and party systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, S., & Studlar, D. T. (1996). The opportunity structure for women’s candidacies and electability in Britain and the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 49(4), 861–874. doi: 10.1177/106591299604900410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. L., & Fell, D. (2001). Taiwan’s party primaries in comparative perspective. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 23–45. doi: 10.1017/S1468109901000123
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. H., Shoji, K., & Batto, N. (2016). Innovations in candidate selection methods. In N. F. Batto, C. Huang, A. C. Tan, & G. W. Cox (Eds.), Mixed-member electoral systems in constitutional context: Taiwan, Japan, and beyond (pp. 135–164). Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. H., Yu, C. H. E., & Shoji, K. (2014). Innovations of candidate selection methods: Polling primary and Kobo under the new electoral rules in Taiwan and Japan. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15(4), 635–659. doi: 10.1017/S1468109914000280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar